On Thu, 24 May 2007 14:05:38 +0200, Michael Reichenbach wrote:
http://www.remotesoft.com/linker/intro.html
it costs far about $1000.
Did someone test it?? Is this serious?
Or is there some free or at least more cheap alternative?
Why there is no native compiler direct from microsoft inside .net sdk?
That you need to install .net framework in order to run programs written
in .net is one of the biggest disadvantages of .net. People who want
portable software (for usb drives), running on all windows computers
still need software written in C or C++.
Is it serious? Yes
Are there free alternatives? No
Are there cheaper alternatives? Probably, there are a few .NET linkers out
there but while you might be able to find cheaper ones, none will be cheap.
Why there is no native compiler direct from microsoft? This has been
already discussed dozens of thousands of times on just about every .NET
discusion group across the world in probably every langage still in use
today over the last 5 years. Please use Google Search.