Xml Schema OR, XOR

[Verticon::]

I have two situations here.

1. XOR: I found I can use the 'choice' type to handle that.
2. OR: I don't know how to do

All three of these are valid:
<root>
<A />
<B />
</root>

<root>
<A />
</root>

<root>
<B />
</root>

This would NOT be valid:
<root>
</root>

How would I lay out the schema for the OR situation here?

[Joseph Kesselman]

Verticon:: wrote:

How would I lay out the schema for the OR situation here?

"One or more instances of the choice" would permit any mixture of A's
and B's but reject the empty case.

If you want to allow ONLY A, B, or AB (not AAB, ABA, etc.)... I think
you need to spell out those three options as separate choices. XML
Schema doesn't have the ability to say "exclude/require X if Y was present".
--
Joe Kesselman / Beware the fury of a patient man. -- John Dryden

[Verticon::]

I just tried to do that. I added a new choice group with A, B, and a
group of A and B. Came back with ambiguous content errors in the
schema; redefining existing nodes.

[Joe Kesselman]

Verticon:: wrote:

I just tried to do that. I added a new choice group with A, B, and a
group of A and B. Came back with ambiguous content errors in the
schema; redefining existing nodes.

That doesn't wholly surprise me, I'm afraid.

I suspect the best you can do is to set zero-to-two on the choice, and
check that they aren't the same in your application code. I'd love to
find out I'm wrong.

See recent discussion of the goals and limitations of XML Schema.
--
() ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Joe Kesselman
/\ Stamp out HTML e-mail! | System architexture and kinetic poetry

[Martin Honnen]

Verticon:: wrote:

I have two situations here.

1. XOR: I found I can use the 'choice' type to handle that.
2. OR: I don't know how to do

All three of these are valid:
<root>
<A />
<B />
</root>

<root>
<A />
</root>

<root>
<B />
</root>

This would NOT be valid:
<root>
</root>

How would I lay out the schema for the OR situation here?

This should do:

<xs:element name="root">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:choice>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="A"/>
<xs:element name="B" minOccurs="0"/>
</xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="B"/>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>

--

Martin Honnen
http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/

[Joe Kesselman]

Martin Honnen wrote:

<xs:element name="root">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:choice>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="A"/>
<xs:element name="B" minOccurs="0"/>
</xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="B"/>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>

Looks reasonable to me. Kicking myself slightly for not having
immediately seen that solution; like I said, I haven't been using schema
enough recently.

--
() ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Joe Kesselman
/\ Stamp out HTML e-mail! | System architexture and kinetic poetry