By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
440,213 Members | 2,108 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 440,213 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

how many versions of RSS / Atom should one support?

P: n/a
I recently saw a phpBB modification that presented feeds in RSS 0.91,
RSS 1.0, RS 2.0, and Atom 1.0. In contrast, sites like wikipedia
(when viewing article history) only seem to offer one version of RSS
and one version of Atom. Digg only offers one version of RSS (2.0).

My question is... just how many versions of RSS / Atom should one try
to support? Is this phpBB modification overkill? Is Digg not
providing enough options?

Feb 12 '07 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
1 Reply


P: n/a
On 12 Feb, 05:59, "yawnmoth" <terra1...@yahoo.comwrote:
My question is... just how many versions of RSS / Atom should one try
to support?
2 or soemtimes 3: Atom 1.0 (because it works), RSS 1.0 (because it's
still the best for sophisticated intranet apps, owing the RDF model),
RSS 2.0 (because you still sadly need it to drive podcasts). RSS 1.0
isn't particularly useful unless you're really _using_ it, and in RDF.

RSS 0.92 is now obsolete. The "compatibility" argument for supporting
it a few years ago has now been supplanted by RSS 2.0.

All the other variants are dead meat, most obviously 0.91, 0.93 etc.
as they're merely minor variants of the main development streams.
Internally I always process feeds as RSS 1.0 (with Jena). Down-
conversion is easy.

Feb 12 '07 #2

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.