473,320 Members | 1,820 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,320 software developers and data experts.

VS2005 NOT Compatiblke with Vista? Are you serious?!

I tried installing my VS2005 Pro on Vista Ultimate 32 bit RTM today and got
errors stating that VS2005 was not compatible with Vista.

Microsoft......please pull your finger out of my ass and tell me this is a
joke.

It must be a joke....because I also have read that VS2002 and VS2003 will
not be supported on Vista. This clearly violates Microsoft's own terms of
support for these products.

Is this even legal?

Jan 28 '07 #1
24 1203
There is a patch for 2005.

"Squishy" <sq*****@shroom.netwrote in message
news:uC**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I tried installing my VS2005 Pro on Vista Ultimate 32 bit RTM today and got
errors stating that VS2005 was not compatible with Vista.

Microsoft......please pull your finger out of my ass and tell me this is a
joke.

It must be a joke....because I also have read that VS2002 and VS2003 will
not be supported on Vista. This clearly violates Microsoft's own terms of
support for these products.

Is this even legal?

Jan 28 '07 #2
Should we apply the patch before installing or just ignore installation
errors and apply the patch after?
"Hayden Kirk" <hayden dot kirk *@* mobilepc dot co do nzwrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
There is a patch for 2005.

"Squishy" <sq*****@shroom.netwrote in message
news:uC**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>I tried installing my VS2005 Pro on Vista Ultimate 32 bit RTM today and
got errors stating that VS2005 was not compatible with Vista.

Microsoft......please pull your finger out of my ass and tell me this is
a joke.

It must be a joke....because I also have read that VS2002 and VS2003 will
not be supported on Vista. This clearly violates Microsoft's own terms
of support for these products.

Is this even legal?

Jan 28 '07 #3
They must have a lot of chemtrails around Redmond, those people have become
FUBAR.

<%= Clinton Gallagher
NET csgallagher AT metromilwaukee.com
URL http://clintongallagher.metromilwaukee.com/
MAP http://wikimapia.org/#y=43038073&x=-...8&z=17&l=0&m=h

"Jim Hubbard" <ji*@privateaddress.netwrote in message
news:BD**********************************@microsof t.com...
Should we apply the patch before installing or just ignore installation
errors and apply the patch after?
"Hayden Kirk" <hayden dot kirk *@* mobilepc dot co do nzwrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>There is a patch for 2005.

"Squishy" <sq*****@shroom.netwrote in message
news:uC**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>I tried installing my VS2005 Pro on Vista Ultimate 32 bit RTM today and
got errors stating that VS2005 was not compatible with Vista.

Microsoft......please pull your finger out of my ass and tell me this is
a joke.

It must be a joke....because I also have read that VS2002 and VS2003
will not be supported on Vista. This clearly violates Microsoft's own
terms of support for these products.

Is this even legal?


Jan 28 '07 #4
And, when we patch, which patch do we use? The BETA Vista Service Pack 1
(at
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en)
or the Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005 Team Suite Service Pack 1 (at
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...DisplayLang=en)
or some other patch that I haven't seen?

Geez people.....REALbasic is looking better all the time.

"Jim Hubbard" <ji*@privateaddress.netwrote in message
news:BD**********************************@microsof t.com...
Should we apply the patch before installing or just ignore installation
errors and apply the patch after?
"Hayden Kirk" <hayden dot kirk *@* mobilepc dot co do nzwrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>There is a patch for 2005.

"Squishy" <sq*****@shroom.netwrote in message
news:uC**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>I tried installing my VS2005 Pro on Vista Ultimate 32 bit RTM today and
got errors stating that VS2005 was not compatible with Vista.

Microsoft......please pull your finger out of my ass and tell me this is
a joke.

It must be a joke....because I also have read that VS2002 and VS2003
will not be supported on Vista. This clearly violates Microsoft's own
terms of support for these products.

Is this even legal?

Jan 28 '07 #5
"Hayden Kirk" <hayden dot kirk *@* mobilepc dot co do nzwrote in news:#
4S*************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:
There is a patch for 2005.
The list of unresolved issues is still huge!
Jan 28 '07 #6
beta? it's been out for a while now as RTM

"Jim Hubbard" <ji*@privateaddress.netwrote in message
news:5E**********************************@microsof t.com...
And, when we patch, which patch do we use? The BETA Vista Service Pack 1
(at
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en)
or the Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005 Team Suite Service Pack 1 (at
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...DisplayLang=en)
or some other patch that I haven't seen?

Geez people.....REALbasic is looking better all the time.

"Jim Hubbard" <ji*@privateaddress.netwrote in message
news:BD**********************************@microsof t.com...
>Should we apply the patch before installing or just ignore installation
errors and apply the patch after?
"Hayden Kirk" <hayden dot kirk *@* mobilepc dot co do nzwrote in
message news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>There is a patch for 2005.

"Squishy" <sq*****@shroom.netwrote in message
news:uC**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
I tried installing my VS2005 Pro on Vista Ultimate 32 bit RTM today and
got errors stating that VS2005 was not compatible with Vista.

Microsoft......please pull your finger out of my ass and tell me this
is a joke.

It must be a joke....because I also have read that VS2002 and VS2003
will not be supported on Vista. This clearly violates Microsoft's own
terms of support for these products.

Is this even legal?


Jan 28 '07 #7
It runs fine if you dont use UAC, if you are a full permission admin it
works perfectly.. the Vista patch fixes some of the UAC issues

"Squishy" <sq*****@shroom.netwrote in message
news:uC**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>I tried installing my VS2005 Pro on Vista Ultimate 32 bit RTM today and got
errors stating that VS2005 was not compatible with Vista.

Microsoft......please pull your finger out of my ass and tell me this is a
joke.

It must be a joke....because I also have read that VS2002 and VS2003 will
not be supported on Vista. This clearly violates Microsoft's own terms of
support for these products.

Is this even legal?

Jan 28 '07 #8

"Spam Catcher" <sp**********@rogers.comwrote in message
news:Xn**********************************@127.0.0. 1...
"Hayden Kirk" <hayden dot kirk *@* mobilepc dot co do nzwrote in news:#
4S*************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl:
>There is a patch for 2005.

The list of unresolved issues is still huge!
Is there a list of VS2005/Vista issues somewhere?

I assume it is best to avoid using VS2005 on Vista for any production stuff
at this time - correct?
Jan 29 '07 #9
To answer my own question....the postings at
http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=274496 seem to indicate that
you should install VS2005, then SP1 then the Vista patch.

I still haven't found a complete listing of Vista/VS2005 problems though.
"Jim Hubbard" <ji*@privateaddress.netwrote in message
news:BD**********************************@microsof t.com...
Should we apply the patch before installing or just ignore installation
errors and apply the patch after?
"Hayden Kirk" <hayden dot kirk *@* mobilepc dot co do nzwrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>There is a patch for 2005.

"Squishy" <sq*****@shroom.netwrote in message
news:uC**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>>I tried installing my VS2005 Pro on Vista Ultimate 32 bit RTM today and
got errors stating that VS2005 was not compatible with Vista.

Microsoft......please pull your finger out of my ass and tell me this is
a joke.

It must be a joke....because I also have read that VS2002 and VS2003
will not be supported on Vista. This clearly violates Microsoft's own
terms of support for these products.

Is this even legal?

Jan 29 '07 #10
"Jim Hubbard" <ji*@privateaddress.netwrote in
news:99**********************************@microsof t.com:

Is there a list of VS2005/Vista issues somewhere?

I assume it is best to avoid using VS2005 on Vista for any production
stuff at this time - correct?

Here it is:

Visual Studio on Windows Vista

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa948853.aspx

I would avoid using VS.NET on Vista until VS.NET 2005 SP1 Update for
Windows Vista is final.
Jan 29 '07 #11
According to the information at
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa948853.aspx, things do not look
as good for Visual Studio 2003 users.

Although I have used VS 2005 since it was available, I still have a number
of web sites where pages were created using VS 2003. I have only changed
two of the sites over to VS 2005, but it now looks like I am going to be
forced to port all of them to VS 2005 if I ever want to change my main
development computer to VISTA. This is not a trivial amount of work.
"Smokey Grindel" <no****@nospam.comwrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
It runs fine if you dont use UAC, if you are a full permission admin it
works perfectly.. the Vista patch fixes some of the UAC issues

"Squishy" <sq*****@shroom.netwrote in message
news:uC**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>I tried installing my VS2005 Pro on Vista Ultimate 32 bit RTM today and
got errors stating that VS2005 was not compatible with Vista.

Microsoft......please pull your finger out of my ass and tell me this is
a joke.

It must be a joke....because I also have read that VS2002 and VS2003 will
not be supported on Vista. This clearly violates Microsoft's own terms
of support for these products.

Is this even legal?


Jan 29 '07 #12
You can always run a VPC with Windows XP and VS2003. Though I'm fairly
sure you'd need two separate licenses for that (or an MSDN subscription
of course).

Jesse

* William LaMartin wrote, On 1/29/2007 5:34 PM:
According to the information at
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/aa948853.aspx, things do not look
as good for Visual Studio 2003 users.

Although I have used VS 2005 since it was available, I still have a number
of web sites where pages were created using VS 2003. I have only changed
two of the sites over to VS 2005, but it now looks like I am going to be
forced to port all of them to VS 2005 if I ever want to change my main
development computer to VISTA. This is not a trivial amount of work.
"Smokey Grindel" <no****@nospam.comwrote in message
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>It runs fine if you dont use UAC, if you are a full permission admin it
works perfectly.. the Vista patch fixes some of the UAC issues

"Squishy" <sq*****@shroom.netwrote in message
news:uC**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
>>I tried installing my VS2005 Pro on Vista Ultimate 32 bit RTM today and
got errors stating that VS2005 was not compatible with Vista.

Microsoft......please pull your finger out of my ass and tell me this is
a joke.

It must be a joke....because I also have read that VS2002 and VS2003 will
not be supported on Vista. This clearly violates Microsoft's own terms
of support for these products.

Is this even legal?

Jan 29 '07 #13
Why do we need to keep going around in circles on this for the last 2 days?
We already established that 2005 installs on Vista and a patch is available,
and that 2003 "can be" installed but may have issues.
Peter

--
Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
Short urls & more: http://ittyurl.net


"unknown" wrote:
>
Jan 29 '07 #14
And it probably will be rehashed again and again for VB.Net 2003 as well as
future crap when Microsoft disregards developers by making prior versions
incompatible...let me see, VB.Net 2003 has been out 3 years and now it's
incompatible with their new operating system. I think I'll skip Vista and
wait for further Linux development!
--
Dennis in Houston
"Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]" wrote:
Why do we need to keep going around in circles on this for the last 2 days?
We already established that 2005 installs on Vista and a patch is available,
and that 2003 "can be" installed but may have issues.
Peter

--
Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
Short urls & more: http://ittyurl.net


"unknown" wrote:
Jan 30 '07 #15
Well you just do that!
"Dennis" <De****@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in message
news:E1**********************************@microsof t.com...
And it probably will be rehashed again and again for VB.Net 2003 as well
as
future crap when Microsoft disregards developers by making prior versions
incompatible...let me see, VB.Net 2003 has been out 3 years and now it's
incompatible with their new operating system. I think I'll skip Vista and
wait for further Linux development!
--
Dennis in Houston
"Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]" wrote:
>Why do we need to keep going around in circles on this for the last 2
days?
We already established that 2005 installs on Vista and a patch is
available,
and that 2003 "can be" installed but may have issues.
Peter

--
Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
Short urls & more: http://ittyurl.net


"unknown" wrote:
>
Jan 30 '07 #16


"Stephany Young" <noone@localhostwrote in message
news:u%****************@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
| Well you just do that!

Agreed.
Jan 30 '07 #17
heh! Knock yourself out!
:-)
--
Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
Short urls & more: http://ittyurl.net


"Dennis" wrote:
And it probably will be rehashed again and again for VB.Net 2003 as well as
future crap when Microsoft disregards developers by making prior versions
incompatible...let me see, VB.Net 2003 has been out 3 years and now it's
incompatible with their new operating system. I think I'll skip Vista and
wait for further Linux development!
--
Dennis in Houston
"Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]" wrote:
Why do we need to keep going around in circles on this for the last 2 days?
We already established that 2005 installs on Vista and a patch is available,
and that 2003 "can be" installed but may have issues.
Peter

--
Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
Short urls & more: http://ittyurl.net


"unknown" wrote:
>
Jan 30 '07 #18
If you do choose that path, I strongly suggest looking into REALbasic.

REALbasic will allow you (in the $600 professional version) to compile apps
that run on Linux, Mac and Windows from the same source code.

The Linux version (compiles apps for Linux only) is free.

www.realbasic.com
"Dennis" <De****@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in message
news:E1**********************************@microsof t.com...
And it probably will be rehashed again and again for VB.Net 2003 as well
as
future crap when Microsoft disregards developers by making prior versions
incompatible...let me see, VB.Net 2003 has been out 3 years and now it's
incompatible with their new operating system. I think I'll skip Vista and
wait for further Linux development!
--
Dennis in Houston
"Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]" wrote:
>Why do we need to keep going around in circles on this for the last 2
days?
We already established that 2005 installs on Vista and a patch is
available,
and that 2003 "can be" installed but may have issues.
Peter

--
Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
Short urls & more: http://ittyurl.net


"unknown" wrote:
>
Jan 30 '07 #19
Hi,

"Jesse Houwing" <je***********@nospam-sogeti.nlwrote in message
news:eE****************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
| You can always run a VPC with Windows XP and VS2003. Though I'm fairly
| sure you'd need two separate licenses for that (or an MSDN subscription
| of course).

Read the thread with subject "No Vista support?" Apparentely it does run ok
in Vista.

The poster says nothing about web apps though. So I think it would be a good
idea to install a VPC and try it.
--
Ignacio Machin
machin AT laceupsolutions com
Jan 31 '07 #20
listen, buster

I don't care if it _RUNS_FINE_IN_VISTA_

IS IT SUPPORTED?

CAN WE CALL UP FOR FREE AND GET SUPPORT WHEN THE BRAND SPANKING NEW
SOFTWARE WILL NOT PLAY NICE?

Is it _OUR_ fault that MIcrosoft doesn't have the forethought to test
these products BEFORE SHIPPING?

I'm pissed off that SQL 2005 won't work with Access 2003; and this is
just yet another example of Microsoft demonstrating that they JUST
DONT GIVE A CRAP

IS IT SUPPORTED, IS IT OUT OF THE BOX SUPPORTED?

I DONT NEED EXTRA SOFTWARE, MORE SOFTWARE

WE SHOULD HAVE HAD THIS INFORMATION THREE MONTHS AGO AND THERE SHOULD
HAVE BEEN A VS PATCH THREE MONTHS AGO

-Aaron

Jan 31 '07 #21
Thanks for tip. Do you have any idea of how steep the learning curve is for
someone who is already high up on VB.Net? I just can't afford a new OS's and
then also have to spend another 500dlrs to upgrade to VB.Net 2005.
--
Dennis in Houston
"Jim Hubbard" wrote:
If you do choose that path, I strongly suggest looking into REALbasic.

REALbasic will allow you (in the $600 professional version) to compile apps
that run on Linux, Mac and Windows from the same source code.

The Linux version (compiles apps for Linux only) is free.

www.realbasic.com
"Dennis" <De****@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in message
news:E1**********************************@microsof t.com...
And it probably will be rehashed again and again for VB.Net 2003 as well
as
future crap when Microsoft disregards developers by making prior versions
incompatible...let me see, VB.Net 2003 has been out 3 years and now it's
incompatible with their new operating system. I think I'll skip Vista and
wait for further Linux development!
--
Dennis in Houston
"Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]" wrote:
Why do we need to keep going around in circles on this for the last 2
days?
We already established that 2005 installs on Vista and a patch is
available,
and that 2003 "can be" installed but may have issues.
Peter

--
Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
Short urls & more: http://ittyurl.net


"unknown" wrote:
Feb 22 '07 #22
Glad you can afford a grand or two every three years or so to upgrade your
software...I can't.

--
Dennis in Houston
"Stephany Young" wrote:
Well you just do that!
"Dennis" <De****@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in message
news:E1**********************************@microsof t.com...
And it probably will be rehashed again and again for VB.Net 2003 as well
as
future crap when Microsoft disregards developers by making prior versions
incompatible...let me see, VB.Net 2003 has been out 3 years and now it's
incompatible with their new operating system. I think I'll skip Vista and
wait for further Linux development!
--
Dennis in Houston
"Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]" wrote:
Why do we need to keep going around in circles on this for the last 2
days?
We already established that 2005 installs on Vista and a patch is
available,
and that 2003 "can be" installed but may have issues.
Peter

--
Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
Short urls & more: http://ittyurl.net


"unknown" wrote:

Feb 22 '07 #23
yeah unless MS comes out with a $49 developers edition of Vista then
they can pretty much kiss my ass
god they really should just give away Vista Express edition instead of
only making it available in China
WHAT ABOUT US?

DO WE NEED TO _PAY_ FOR A LANGUAGE WITH LESS FUNCTIONALITY?

CAN I RUN VB.NET in SQL SERVER ACTIVEX SCRIPTS?

ROFLMAO
On Feb 21, 4:22 pm, Dennis <Den...@discussions.microsoft.comwrote:
Thanks for tip. Do you have any idea of how steep the learning curve is for
someone who is already high up on VB.Net? I just can't afford a new OS's and
then also have to spend another 500dlrs to upgrade to VB.Net 2005.
--
Dennis in Houston

"Jim Hubbard" wrote:
If you do choose that path, I strongly suggest looking into REALbasic.
REALbasic will allow you (in the $600 professional version) to compile apps
that run on Linux, Mac and Windows from the same source code.
The Linux version (compiles apps for Linux only) is free.
www.realbasic.com
"Dennis" <Den...@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in message
news:E1**********************************@microsof t.com...
And it probably will be rehashed again and again for VB.Net 2003 as well
as
future crap when Microsoft disregards developers by making prior versions
incompatible...let me see, VB.Net 2003 has been out 3 years and now it's
incompatible with their new operating system. I think I'll skip Vista and
wait for further Linux development!
--
Dennis in Houston
"Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]" wrote:
>Why do we need to keep going around in circles on this for the last 2
>days?
>We already established that 2005 installs on Vista and a patch is
>available,
>and that 2003 "can be" installed but may have issues.
>Peter
>--
>Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
>UnBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
>Short urls & more: http://ittyurl.net
>"unknown" wrote:

Feb 22 '07 #24
Have you considered trying out VB2005Express? It's free.

Robin S.
-------------------------
"Dennis" <De****@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in message
news:DA**********************************@microsof t.com...
Thanks for tip. Do you have any idea of how steep the learning curve is
for
someone who is already high up on VB.Net? I just can't afford a new OS's
and
then also have to spend another 500dlrs to upgrade to VB.Net 2005.
--
Dennis in Houston
"Jim Hubbard" wrote:
>If you do choose that path, I strongly suggest looking into REALbasic.

REALbasic will allow you (in the $600 professional version) to compile
apps
that run on Linux, Mac and Windows from the same source code.

The Linux version (compiles apps for Linux only) is free.

www.realbasic.com
"Dennis" <De****@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in message
news:E1**********************************@microso ft.com...
And it probably will be rehashed again and again for VB.Net 2003 as
well
as
future crap when Microsoft disregards developers by making prior
versions
incompatible...let me see, VB.Net 2003 has been out 3 years and now
it's
incompatible with their new operating system. I think I'll skip Vista
and
wait for further Linux development!
--
Dennis in Houston
"Peter Bromberg [C# MVP]" wrote:

Why do we need to keep going around in circles on this for the last 2
days?
We already established that 2005 installs on Vista and a patch is
available,
and that 2003 "can be" installed but may have issues.
Peter

--
Site: http://www.eggheadcafe.com
UnBlog: http://petesbloggerama.blogspot.com
Short urls & more: http://ittyurl.net


"unknown" wrote:


Feb 22 '07 #25

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

56
by: Squishy | last post by:
I tried installing my VS2005 Pro on Vista Ultimate 32 bit RTM today and got errors stating that VS2005 was not compatible with Vista. Microsoft......please pull your finger out of my ass and tell...
0
by: DolphinDB | last post by:
The formulas of 101 quantitative trading alphas used by WorldQuant were presented in the paper 101 Formulaic Alphas. However, some formulas are complex, leading to challenges in calculation. Take...
0
by: DolphinDB | last post by:
Tired of spending countless mintues downsampling your data? Look no further! In this article, you’ll learn how to efficiently downsample 6.48 billion high-frequency records to 61 million...
1
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
0
by: Vimpel783 | last post by:
Hello! Guys, I found this code on the Internet, but I need to modify it a little. It works well, the problem is this: Data is sent from only one cell, in this case B5, but it is necessary that data...
0
by: jfyes | last post by:
As a hardware engineer, after seeing that CEIWEI recently released a new tool for Modbus RTU Over TCP/UDP filtering and monitoring, I actively went to its official website to take a look. It turned...
0
by: CloudSolutions | last post by:
Introduction: For many beginners and individual users, requiring a credit card and email registration may pose a barrier when starting to use cloud servers. However, some cloud server providers now...
0
by: Defcon1945 | last post by:
I'm trying to learn Python using Pycharm but import shutil doesn't work
1
by: Shællîpôpï 09 | last post by:
If u are using a keypad phone, how do u turn on JavaScript, to access features like WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram....
0
by: Faith0G | last post by:
I am starting a new it consulting business and it's been a while since I setup a new website. Is wordpress still the best web based software for hosting a 5 page website? The webpages will be...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.