In article <45***********************@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>,
Martin Honnen <Ma***********@gmx.dewrote:
>What are the differences between "XML 1.0 Well-Formed" and "XML 1.1
Well-Formed"?
>Look into the XML 1.1 specification for details, there are differences
on what Unicode characters are allowed in names I think, then XML 1.1
allows certain control characters which are not allowed at all in XML
1.0 to be included as character references (e.g. )
Also:
- The IBM newline NEL (#x85) is treated as a line-end character;
- The C1 controls (0x7f-0x9f, except NEL) cannot appear literally
but must be represented using character references;
- XML 1.1 document should be fully Unicode normalised.
-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.