"Ben Voigt" <rb*@nospam.nospamwrote in message
news:eQ****************@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
: "Ivan Vecerina" <IN*****************@ivan.vecerina.comwrote in
message
: news:ev****************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
: "Ben Voigt" <rb*@nospam.nospamwrote in message
: news:eM**************@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
: : I've developed patches to doxygen for C++/CLI. I e-mailed them to
the
: : developer before with no response, so yesterday I submitted them
as a
: : bug report.
: :
: :
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364536
: :
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364541
: >
: This is great.
: Not sure this is appropriate, but I added a comment to support
: the importance of this patch. I hope it will be integrated...
:
: Well Dimitri has accepted two of my patches already, although much
smaller
: and not related to C++/CLI. I'm pretty hopeful though, seeing that C#
is
: partially supported there obviously in interest in .NET, and these
patches
: additionally improve treatment of ANSI C++ keywords such as
static_cast.
:
: Will you be able to recompile doxygen yourself to use the patches?
I believe I would be able.
But right now I am in an early (rush) phase of a project, and it is
more a matter for me to decide/choose which documentation approach
to use. The choice of C++/CLI (mainly to be able to replace the
antiquated MFC with the more convenient/modern/supported Forms) is
itself still being debated...
As I have come to rely on doxygen in my other (pure) C++ projects,
I'm very happy to know that support for C++/CLI is happening.
But (regretfully) it is still early for me to build & test these
improvements...
I will keep an eye on this though...
--
http://ivan.vecerina.com/contact/?subject=NG_POST <- email contact form