Which version?

[Linn Kubler]

Hi,

I was just wondering, do I need to have both versions of .NET installed on
my computer? I see there is Version 1.1 and Version 2.0, does 2.0 include
all the functionallity of 1.1?

Please advise,
Linn

[BlackWasp]

Pretty much.

*Most* .NET 1.1 applications wil run happily (sometimes better) under .NET
2.0. However, there are some changes in .NET 2.0 that cause issues. The
best bet is to install both for general work but test your programs in a
situation with both together and both individually.

That is, unless you are developing for .NET 2.0 in which case testing with
just .NET 1.1 would be silly. ;-)

--

BlackWasp
http://www.blackwasp.co.uk/
"Linn Kubler" <lk*****@chartwellwisc2.comwrote in message
news:eT**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

Hi,

I was just wondering, do I need to have both versions of .NET installed on
my computer? I see there is Version 1.1 and Version 2.0, does 2.0 include
all the functionallity of 1.1?

Please advise,
Linn

[Linn Kubler]

Yeah, we're not doing development this is just for general users. I don't
even know that we are using any .NET applications but think it prudent to
have it installed. Sounds like I could get away with just running 2.0
unless I run into a problem. Is that correct?

Thanks,
Linn

"BlackWasp" <[e-mail] in message
news:VL******************************@eclipse.net. uk...

Pretty much.

*Most* .NET 1.1 applications wil run happily (sometimes better) under .NET
2.0. However, there are some changes in .NET 2.0 that cause issues. The
best bet is to install both for general work but test your programs in a
situation with both together and both individually.

That is, unless you are developing for .NET 2.0 in which case testing with
just .NET 1.1 would be silly. ;-)

--

BlackWasp
http://www.blackwasp.co.uk/
"Linn Kubler" <lk*****@chartwellwisc2.comwrote in message
news:eT**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>Hi,

I was just wondering, do I need to have both versions of .NET installed
on my computer? I see there is Version 1.1 and Version 2.0, does 2.0
include all the functionallity of 1.1?

Please advise,
Linn

[Markus]

Sounds like I could get away with just running 2.0 unless I run into

a problem. Is that correct?

No matter what system in the world you are running, as long there are
not problems, it's fine ;-).

Concerning .NET: Yes, I normally only install the 2.0 Version and
never ran into 1.1 or 1.0 backward compatibility issues.

Markus

[Cor Ligthert [MVP]]

Linn,

In addition to the others who wrote "there are some issues". As long that
there is not a Service Pack for Net 2.0, than it is in my idea better to use
both versions.

Just my thought,

Cor

"Linn Kubler" <lk*****@chartwellwisc2.comschreef in bericht
news:%2****************@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

Yeah, we're not doing development this is just for general users. I don't
even know that we are using any .NET applications but think it prudent to
have it installed. Sounds like I could get away with just running 2.0
unless I run into a problem. Is that correct?

Thanks,
Linn

"BlackWasp" <[e-mail] in message
news:VL******************************@eclipse.net. uk...

>Pretty much.

*Most* .NET 1.1 applications wil run happily (sometimes better) under
.NET 2.0. However, there are some changes in .NET 2.0 that cause issues.
The best bet is to install both for general work but test your programs
in a situation with both together and both individually.

That is, unless you are developing for .NET 2.0 in which case testing
with just .NET 1.1 would be silly. ;-)

--

BlackWasp
http://www.blackwasp.co.uk/
"Linn Kubler" <lk*****@chartwellwisc2.comwrote in message
news:eT**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>Hi,

I was just wondering, do I need to have both versions of .NET installed
on my computer? I see there is Version 1.1 and Version 2.0, does 2.0
include all the functionallity of 1.1?

Please advise,
Linn

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Markus <di***************@THISyahoo.dewrote:

Sounds like I could get away with just running 2.0 unless I run into
a problem. Is that correct?

No matter what system in the world you are running, as long there are
not problems, it's fine ;-).

Concerning .NET: Yes, I normally only install the 2.0 Version and
never ran into 1.1 or 1.0 backward compatibility issues.

I've run into a few. There are some pretty interesting ones lurking
around. Three that I've run into:

1) Different handling of boxed out/ref parameters with reflection
2) Different regex handling in some situations
3) Something about cryptography, but I can't remember the details

(None of these are listed on the MS compatibility page, btw...)

You can pretty much bet that for any incompatibility I run into,
there'll be several (a hundred?) others...

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Cor Ligthert [MVP] <no************@planet.nlwrote:

In addition to the others who wrote "there are some issues". As long that
there is not a Service Pack for Net 2.0, than it is in my idea better to use
both versions.

I'd say that even if there's a service pack, there will be some
incompatibilities. In some cases there's logically incorrect behaviour
which has been fixed in 2.0, but which will break some 1.1 apps... I
wouldn't expect a service pack to reverse that kind of decision.

--
Jon Skeet - <sk***@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
If replying to the group, please do not mail me too