Hi N. Spiker,
From MSDN for OOB data:
Arrival of a TCP segment with the URG (for urgent) flag set indicates the
existence of a single byte of OOB data within the TCP data stream. The "OOB
data block is one byte in size. The urgent pointer is a positive offset from
the current sequence number in the TCP header that indicates the location of
the "OOB data block (ambiguously, as noted in the preceding). It might,
therefore, point to data that has not yet been received.
If SO_OOBINLINE is disabled (the default) when the TCP segment containing
the byte pointed to by the urgent pointer arrives, the OOB data block (one
byte) is removed from the data stream and buffered. If a subsequent TCP
segment arrives with the urgent flag set (and a new urgent pointer), the OOB
byte currently queued can be lost as it is replaced by the new OOB data
block (as occurs in Berkeley Software Distribution). It is never replaced in
the data stream, however.
With SO_OOBINLINE enabled, the urgent data remains in the data stream. As a
result, the OOB data block is never lost when a new TCP segment arrives
containing urgent data. The existing OOB data "mark" is updated to the new
position.
Link to article that contains info about OOB and non-OOB data flaged as
urgent; watch for wrapping:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...and_data_2.asp
HTH
"N. Spiker" <N.
Sp****@discussions.microsoft.comwrote in message
news:DF**********************************@microsof t.com...
>I am attempting to receive a single TCP packet with some text ending with
carriage return and line feed characters. When the text is send and the
packet has the urgent flag set, the text read from the socket is missing
the
last character (line feed). When the same text is sent without the urgent
flag set, all of the characters are read.
I'm reading the data using the blocking read call of the network stream
class. The .NET documentation does not discuss a special method needed to
support reading urgent data from a network stream.
I verified that in both cases the data is arriving correctly using a
packet
sniffer (Ethereal). I also verified that both receiving and sending
parties
are interpreting the urgent pointer according to the BSD implementation.
Is the urgent flag supported?