Looking for your highly subjective opinions (from those of you who have been
working extensively with VS 2005).
I have a client that needs/wants a complete rewrite of an existing
application. I will be proposing a .NET Windows application with a
supporting SQL Server database. It will likely take 4-5 months before we
roll out the first production version.
Because of the apparent issues with VS 2005 (poor performance, unpredictable
and generally buggy behaviour), I am thinking it might make sense to develop
this app in VS.NET 2003/.NET 1.1. Then, around the time we're ready to roll
out the first production version, migrate it to .NET 2.x just before going
live.
I say 2.x because Microsoft has plans to release a service pack for it
mid-way through 2006, so we might have a minor version number change at that
time. Also, it appears that the service pack from Microsoft, if released
mid-year, will stabilize things so we can [hopefully] have a smooth
transition to 2.x just before going live.
Does this strategy make sense? Thoughts? Opinions?
Thanks!