How Many Planning To Rewrite Their Webs To Support Firefox?

[clintonG]

Let's face it, Firefox is slow, buggy and does not support DHTML, JavaScript
or accessibility any better than any other browser but does in fact do a
much worse job in many regards notably its ridiculously poor support for
DHTML. I don't want to argue facts I have already established and I am not
going to prove myself to anybody.

All I am doing is asserting facts and asking how many developers or others
intend to rewrite their websites to support Firefox?

If you are one that intends to do so please estimate your cost in hours of
doing so for the sites you manage and state who you think is going to bear
the costs of doing so.

--
<%= Clinton Gallagher
METROmilwaukee "Regional Information Services"
NET csgallagher AT metromilwaukee.com
URL http://clintongallagher.metromilwaukee.com/

[cody]

The question is who is actually so stupid to write his webapp in a manner so
that is only runs on internet explorer? Well written websites runs in every
browser so there is no need to rewrite anything.

"clintonG" <cs*********@REMOVETHISTEXTmetromilwaukee.com> schrieb im
Newsbeitrag news:O8**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...

Let's face it, Firefox is slow, buggy and does not support DHTML,
JavaScript
or accessibility any better than any other browser but does in fact do a
much worse job in many regards notably its ridiculously poor support for
DHTML. I don't want to argue facts I have already established and I am not
going to prove myself to anybody.

All I am doing is asserting facts and asking how many developers or others
intend to rewrite their websites to support Firefox?

If you are one that intends to do so please estimate your cost in hours of
doing so for the sites you manage and state who you think is going to bear
the costs of doing so.

--
<%= Clinton Gallagher
METROmilwaukee "Regional Information Services"
NET csgallagher AT metromilwaukee.com
URL http://clintongallagher.metromilwaukee.com/