Hi all,
I am using Win2k, VS. NET 7.1 (MS development Environment 2003 7.1.3088)
and I noticed that by building the exact same code twice the generated
binaries are different (not much, but they are). To be sure I tried a
simple console application like void main(){} and 2 times rebuilding the
project gets 2 different binaries.
Has anybody any clue why this happens?
Could I somehow change a setting or something to remove those diff (I
mean from the same code to get identical binaries)?
Thanks in advance,
Viv 4 2090
"Viviana Vc" <vc*******@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2i************@uni-berlin.de... Hi all,
I am using Win2k, VS. NET 7.1 (MS development Environment 2003 7.1.3088) and I noticed that by building the exact same code twice the generated binaries are different (not much, but they are). To be sure I tried a simple console application like void main(){} and 2 times rebuilding the project gets 2 different binaries.
Has anybody any clue why this happens? Could I somehow change a setting or something to remove those diff (I mean from the same code to get identical binaries)?
Thanks in advance, Viv
void main(){} is undefined bahaviour therefore the compiler is free to do
what it wants. Vey unlikely this is the cause however. I am not sure about
the format of an exe, but could it be the timestamps that are causing them
to be different?
Allan
I found the following article: http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;164151
which tells that indeed the timestamp is the diff, but I couldn't find
in VC++ IDE any setting to disable the timepstamp stuff, and I assume
this should be somehow doable.
Thx,
Viv
On Sat, 05 Jun 2004 14:55:45 +0200, Viviana Vc <vc*******@hotmail.com>
wrote : Hi all,
I am using Win2k, VS. NET 7.1 (MS development Environment 2003 7.1.3088) and I noticed that by building the exact same code twice the generated binaries are different (not much, but they are). To be sure I tried a simple console application like void main(){} and 2 times rebuilding the project gets 2 different binaries.
Has anybody any clue why this happens? Could I somehow change a setting or something to remove those diff (I mean from the same code to get identical binaries)?
Thanks in advance, Viv
Hi, Viviana
depending on settings you can get different timestamps and versions in
binaries. Which will cause different hashes and some other fields - don't
remember now exactly wich ones. If you are really interested - check PE
format description for .Net assemblies on MSDN.
HTH
Alex
"Viviana Vc" <vc*******@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2i************@uni-berlin.de... Hi all,
I am using Win2k, VS. NET 7.1 (MS development Environment 2003 7.1.3088) and I noticed that by building the exact same code twice the generated binaries are different (not much, but they are). To be sure I tried a simple console application like void main(){} and 2 times rebuilding the project gets 2 different binaries.
Has anybody any clue why this happens? Could I somehow change a setting or something to remove those diff (I mean from the same code to get identical binaries)?
Thanks in advance, Viv
Viviana Vc wrote: I am using Win2k, VS. NET 7.1 (MS development Environment 2003 7.1.3088) and I noticed that by building the exact same code twice the generated binaries are different (not much, but they are). To be sure I tried a simple console application like void main(){} and 2 times rebuilding the project gets 2 different binaries.
Has anybody any clue why this happens?
At least the time-stamp is different.
Could I somehow change a setting or something to remove those diff (I mean from the same code to get identical binaries)?
In general: No. You can change the timestamp "by hand".
For more info see:
Microsoft Portable Executable and Common Object File Format
Specification http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system...re/PECOFF.mspx
It was already discussed several times in some newsgroups; see for
example: http://groups.google.de/groups?&thre...%40tkmsftngp04
--
Greetings
Jochen
Do you need a memory-leak finder ? http://www.codeproject.com/tools/leakfinder.asp
Do you need daily reports from your server? http://sourceforge.net/projects/srvreport/ This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Viviana Vc |
last post by:
Hi all,
I am using Win2k, VS. NET 7.1 (MS development Environment 2003 7.1.3088)
and I noticed that by building the exact same code twice the generated
binaries are different (not much, but they...
|
by: |
last post by:
I am rewriting a C++ application in C#. This file has a combination of Text
and Binary data.
I used CFile before to read the text. If I hit a certain string that
denotes the following data is...
|
by: Martin Klaffenboeck |
last post by:
Hello!
I have 2 queries:
The {..} are precalculated values. At the beginning no item can be
matched by both where clauses.
1)
update tabelle
set L = L + {MOVE}
|
by: Ching-Lung |
last post by:
Hi all,
I try to create a tool to check the delta (diff) of 2
binaries and create the delta binary. I use binary
formatter (serialization) to create the delta binary. It
works fine but the...
|
by: GT |
last post by:
I have a .NET client that consumes an Axis web service. A change was
made recently to the AXIS web service, and ever since then my .NET
proxy class has been throwing an InvalidCastException. The...
|
by: Stef Mientki |
last post by:
Does anyone know the equivalent of the MatLab "diff" function.
The "diff" functions calculates the difference between 2 succeeding
elements of an array.
I need to detect (fast) the falling edge of...
|
by: Steven Bethard |
last post by:
Jean-Paul Calderone <exarkun@divmod.comwrote:
Interesting. Could you give a few illustrations of this? (I didn't run
into the same problem at all, so I'm curious.)
Steve
|
by: John Nagle |
last post by:
Back in March, I posted this:
That was for M2Crypto 0.17.
It's still broken in M2Crypto 0.18.
And there's no RPM or Windows binary.
Nobody actually uses this stuff, do they?
|
by: WTH |
last post by:
I am now aware (I am primarily a C++ developer) that in C# if you reference
the same interface from the same file in two different projects the types
are actually incompatible.
I found this out...
|
by: Dave |
last post by:
I'm having a hard time tying to build gcc 4.3.1 on Solaris using the GNU
compilers. I then decided to try to use Sun's compiler. The Sun Studio
12 compiler reports the following code, which is in...
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
| |