473,385 Members | 1,720 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,385 software developers and data experts.

Is .NET 2.0 Framework going to take advantage of 64-bit computing?

int
Is .NET 2.0 Framework going to take advantage of 64-bit computing?

Intel and especially AMD's Opteron are 64-bit and they are really
inexpensive.

Look at the prices here...
http://www.anandtech.com/guides/priceguide.html

By the time .NET 2.0 comes out, maybe middle to late 2005 at the earliest,
64-bit computing will be mainstream and will be bulk of all processors
shipping.

And what about SQL Server 64-bit? and how will MySql 64-bit affect this
entire landscape?

Jul 21 '05 #1
9 1370
yes .net 2.0 will have x64, and IA64 support covering both intel and AMD
with both extended 64 and native 64 (AMD of which does not make a native
64bit chip, just an extended one, where as the itanium of course is a fully
64bit chip)
"int" <in*******@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OS*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Is .NET 2.0 Framework going to take advantage of 64-bit computing?

Intel and especially AMD's Opteron are 64-bit and they are really
inexpensive.

Look at the prices here...
http://www.anandtech.com/guides/priceguide.html

By the time .NET 2.0 comes out, maybe middle to late 2005 at the earliest,
64-bit computing will be mainstream and will be bulk of all processors
shipping.

And what about SQL Server 64-bit? and how will MySql 64-bit affect this
entire landscape?

Jul 21 '05 #2
SQL Server 64-bit is already out for the Intel processors. I'm not sure if
it will ever be available in SQL 2000 for the Opteron processor; however,
Yukon will definitely support the Opteron processor, eventually. Windows
server 2003 will offer support for the Opteron with the release of service
pack 1 (2nd half of this year.) You can download a public beta from
Microsoft. I'm not sure about the framework. You can get more information
here:

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserv...t/default.mspx

John Oakes
"int" <in*******@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OS*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Is .NET 2.0 Framework going to take advantage of 64-bit computing?

Intel and especially AMD's Opteron are 64-bit and they are really
inexpensive.

Look at the prices here...
http://www.anandtech.com/guides/priceguide.html

By the time .NET 2.0 comes out, maybe middle to late 2005 at the earliest,
64-bit computing will be mainstream and will be bulk of all processors
shipping.

And what about SQL Server 64-bit? and how will MySql 64-bit affect this
entire landscape?

Jul 21 '05 #3
Yes, even your .NET code should be able to support 64 bit platforms without
you even needing to recompile your code.

--
I hope this helps,
Steve C. Orr, MCSD, MVP
http://Steve.Orr.net
"int" <in*******@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OS*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Is .NET 2.0 Framework going to take advantage of 64-bit computing?

Intel and especially AMD's Opteron are 64-bit and they are really
inexpensive.

Look at the prices here...
http://www.anandtech.com/guides/priceguide.html

By the time .NET 2.0 comes out, maybe middle to late 2005 at the earliest,
64-bit computing will be mainstream and will be bulk of all processors
shipping.

And what about SQL Server 64-bit? and how will MySql 64-bit affect this
entire landscape?

Jul 21 '05 #4
int
anyone have an ideas on the percentage (% )performance increase for .NET
apps,
like how many more ASP.NET pages can be served?


"Steve C. Orr [MVP, MCSD]" <St***@Orr.net> wrote in message
news:O6*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Yes, even your .NET code should be able to support 64 bit platforms without you even needing to recompile your code.

--
I hope this helps,
Steve C. Orr, MCSD, MVP
http://Steve.Orr.net
"int" <in*******@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OS*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Is .NET 2.0 Framework going to take advantage of 64-bit computing?

Intel and especially AMD's Opteron are 64-bit and they are really
inexpensive.

Look at the prices here...
http://www.anandtech.com/guides/priceguide.html

By the time .NET 2.0 comes out, maybe middle to late 2005 at the earliest, 64-bit computing will be mainstream and will be bulk of all processors
shipping.

And what about SQL Server 64-bit? and how will MySql 64-bit affect this
entire landscape?


Jul 21 '05 #5
Only if you haven't monkeyed around with interop. You could potentially have
porting issues there.
If you have purely managed code, you should be good to go.

-Rob Teixeira [MVP]

"Steve C. Orr [MVP, MCSD]" <St***@Orr.net> wrote in message
news:O6*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Yes, even your .NET code should be able to support 64 bit platforms without you even needing to recompile your code.

--
I hope this helps,
Steve C. Orr, MCSD, MVP
http://Steve.Orr.net

Jul 21 '05 #6
Nope. Too early to tell as the code isn't even stable yet.
But anyone who has run tests isn't allowed to post statistics due to the NDA
(non-disclosure agreement).
Just sit tight and wait for MS to publish something official :-)

-Rob Teixeira [MVP]

"int" <in*******@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eE**************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
anyone have an ideas on the percentage (% )performance increase for .NET
apps,
like how many more ASP.NET pages can be served?


"Steve C. Orr [MVP, MCSD]" <St***@Orr.net> wrote in message
news:O6*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Yes, even your .NET code should be able to support 64 bit platforms

without
you even needing to recompile your code.

--
I hope this helps,
Steve C. Orr, MCSD, MVP
http://Steve.Orr.net
"int" <in*******@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OS*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Is .NET 2.0 Framework going to take advantage of 64-bit computing?

Intel and especially AMD's Opteron are 64-bit and they are really
inexpensive.

Look at the prices here...
http://www.anandtech.com/guides/priceguide.html

By the time .NET 2.0 comes out, maybe middle to late 2005 at the earliest, 64-bit computing will be mainstream and will be bulk of all processors
shipping.

And what about SQL Server 64-bit? and how will MySql 64-bit affect this entire landscape?



Jul 21 '05 #7
Hi Steve,
Yes, even your .NET code should be able to support 64 bit platforms without you even needing to recompile your code.


Even when there are API's in it?

Cor
Jul 21 '05 #8
Hi Rob,

Did not see your message before, I answered from the language group, they
can skip my other message.

Cor
Jul 21 '05 #9
Yes. The Framework install of the CLR will be the telling point. You will
not have to alter any code to take advantage. At least that is the "rumor"
running around. Of course, anything can change between now and then.

--
Gregory A. Beamer
MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

************************************************
Think Outside the Box!
************************************************
"int" <in*******@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OS*************@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Is .NET 2.0 Framework going to take advantage of 64-bit computing?

Intel and especially AMD's Opteron are 64-bit and they are really
inexpensive.

Look at the prices here...
http://www.anandtech.com/guides/priceguide.html

By the time .NET 2.0 comes out, maybe middle to late 2005 at the earliest,
64-bit computing will be mainstream and will be bulk of all processors
shipping.

And what about SQL Server 64-bit? and how will MySql 64-bit affect this
entire landscape?

Jul 21 '05 #10

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

81
by: julio | last post by:
Sorry but there is no another way, c# .net and mono are going to rip python, not because python is a bad lenguage, but because is to darn old and it refuses to innovate things, to fix wrong things,...
132
by: Kevin Spencer | last post by:
About 2 years ago, and as recently as perhaps 1 year ago, I can recall seeing many posts about what language to use with ASP.Net. The consensus was that employers paid more for C# programmers, and...
23
by: Nak | last post by:
Hi there, Has anyone any ideas if the next Framework will be an update to version 1.1 or another completely new install so that people have 3 Frameworks on their system? And can VS.NET 2003 be...
19
by: Tom Jastrzebski | last post by:
Hello, I was just testing VB.Net on Framework.Net 2.0 performance when I run into the this problem. This trivial code attached below executed hundreds, if not thousand times faster in VB 6.0...
28
by: Peter Olcott | last post by:
I want to double check my understanding about how the .NET framework works. From what I understand every call to the .NET framework is ultimately translated into one of more API calls, is this...
3
by: Ted Ngo | last post by:
Hi All, My company want to buy the new Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 for their employees to develop our web application. After we develop the web application using the new Microsoft Visual...
2
by: Hemang Shah | last post by:
Hello I have an application I developed on the 1.1 framework. Now I want to take advantage of the 2.0 framework in my application.. Can I just recompile my existing code on 2.0? How does...
34
by: emrahayanoglu | last post by:
Hello Everyone, Now, I'm working on a new web framework. I tried many test on the other programming languages. Then i decided to use python on my web framework project. Now i want to listen...
17
by: Peter Anthony | last post by:
Can the 3.5 version of .NET Framework (currently Beta 2) be installed on pre-Vista machines? Or is it Vista-only? And, why doesn't .NET Framework come pre-installed with the operating system? I...
9
by: Cirene | last post by:
I'm about to begin a brand new, big, ASP.NET project (using 3.5 .net fw), VS 2008. I'm using MySQL as the backend (customer request.) I have absolutely no experience with LINQ and/or the Entity...
0
by: Charles Arthur | last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
0
by: aa123db | last post by:
Variable and constants Use var or let for variables and const fror constants. Var foo ='bar'; Let foo ='bar';const baz ='bar'; Functions function $name$ ($parameters$) { } ...
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
If we have dozens or hundreds of excel to import into the database, if we use the excel import function provided by database editors such as navicat, it will be extremely tedious and time-consuming...
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
0
by: emmanuelkatto | last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud. Please let me know. Thanks! Emmanuel
0
BarryA
by: BarryA | last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
0
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
0
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.