GetTickCount problem P4 hyperthread

[Dark74]

Vladimir Nesterovsky wrote:

If you realy need to measure short time use rathe
QueryPerformanceCounter
and QueryPerformanceFrequency instead of GetTickCount.
--
Vladimir Nesterovsky
e-mail: vl******@nesterovsky-bros.com
home: http://www.nesterovsky-bros.com [/b]

Thank You, That is a good solution yes, and I have to test if th
behaviour is ok (when I get to my computer at work). GetTickCoun
resolution is not good, but i just has to measure if a hardware devic
respond or not, and I do not need high resolution, a brute fix for m
problem was to insert Sleep(10) between two tickCount query. What i
realy bother me is god old GetTickCount can trigger such problems (on
of my programs returned with serious bugreport, I search and tested i
any circumstances, the bug does not apear, after that I get a ne
computer to be in the same condition like the client, and the bug wa
there... (somethime negative elapsed time) ... :(...
-
Dark7
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via http://www.codecomments.co
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[ERROR]

try Enviroment::TickCount also...:)

"Dark74" wrote:

Vladimir Nesterovsky wrote:

If you realy need to measure short time use rather
QueryPerformanceCounter
and QueryPerformanceFrequency instead of GetTickCount.
--
Vladimir Nesterovsky
e-mail: vl******@nesterovsky-bros.com
home: http://www.nesterovsky-bros.com [/b]

Thank You, That is a good solution yes, and I have to test if the
behaviour is ok (when I get to my computer at work). GetTickCount
resolution is not good, but i just has to measure if a hardware device
respond or not, and I do not need high resolution, a brute fix for my
problem was to insert Sleep(10) between two tickCount query. What is
realy bother me is god old GetTickCount can trigger such problems (one
of my programs returned with serious bugreport, I search and tested in
any circumstances, the bug does not apear, after that I get a new
computer to be in the same condition like the client, and the bug was
there... (somethime negative elapsed time) ... :(....

--
Dark74
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via http://www.codecomments.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------