Namespace Question

[John Jenkins]

I sent this question in before, so apologies.

I have a number of schemas which I add into a schema collection. A number of
the schemas define types, the others contain business context message
details (e.g. updating an employee etc). The schemas which define general
types have their own namespace defined. All the other schemas have the

same<< namespace.

After loading 101 schemas into my collection I get the error

"Server was unable to process request. The global element
urn:xxxx/yyy/zzz:abc has already been declared"

There are still approximately 140 schemas in total.

"abc" is imported into a number of other schemas. Why would the collection
wait till over 100 schemas have been added to report this error? When the
error is reported I can identify at least 50 schemas that have already
imported this schema, and used the types defined in it.

Can someone explain this behaviour? Should all my schemas have different
namespaces?

Thanks for any help.

[Priya Lakshminarayanan [MSFT]]

There is a KB article regarding multiple imports/includes of the same schema
at:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/317490/EN-US/

HTH,
Priya

"John Jenkins" <jo**********@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:R8***************@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net...

I sent this question in before, so apologies.

I have a number of schemas which I add into a schema collection. A number of the schemas define types, the others contain business context message
details (e.g. updating an employee etc). The schemas which define general
types have their own namespace defined. All the other schemas have the

same<< namespace.

After loading 101 schemas into my collection I get the error

"Server was unable to process request. The global element
urn:xxxx/yyy/zzz:abc has already been declared"

There are still approximately 140 schemas in total.

"abc" is imported into a number of other schemas. Why would the collection
wait till over 100 schemas have been added to report this error? When the
error is reported I can identify at least 50 schemas that have already
imported this schema, and used the types defined in it.

Can someone explain this behaviour? Should all my schemas have different
namespaces?

Thanks for any help.

[John Jenkins]

Thanks Priya,
is there a fix / workaround? I cannot modify my schemas.
"Priya Lakshminarayanan [MSFT]" <pr****@online.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:42********@news.microsoft.com...

There is a KB article regarding multiple imports/includes of the same schema at:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/317490/EN-US/

HTH,
Priya

"John Jenkins" <jo**********@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:R8***************@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net...

I sent this question in before, so apologies.

I have a number of schemas which I add into a schema collection. A number

of

the schemas define types, the others contain business context message
details (e.g. updating an employee etc). The schemas which define

general types have their own namespace defined. All the other schemas have the

>same<< namespace.

After loading 101 schemas into my collection I get the error

"Server was unable to process request. The global element
urn:xxxx/yyy/zzz:abc has already been declared"

There are still approximately 140 schemas in total.

"abc" is imported into a number of other schemas. Why would the collection wait till over 100 schemas have been added to report this error? When the error is reported I can identify at least 50 schemas that have already
imported this schema, and used the types defined in it.

Can someone explain this behaviour? Should all my schemas have different
namespaces?

Thanks for any help.