Hi Bennie,
If you want full Type fidelity, and the "stability" ...
The "stabiliyty" probably is not a good word, so let's use the word "compatibility".
This is exactly the place, where I was prepared to give up Type fidelity of SOAP serialization
in favor of "compatibility" of XML Serialization. My thought was, that because of less "intimacy" in
only public members serialization with XML, I would gain in "compatibility". And the question is: is it really so?
What is the level of compatibility of SOAP serialization? In fact, SOAP serialization is a binary serialization
with SOAP formatting, so I would think that it provades NO "compatibility" at all or very weak "compatibility".
But I'm not sure...
Boris