Hi Cor,
I would gladly engage with a conversation with you on this or any other
issue. It is true that beta software has risks, and that using it comes
with some concern. I suggested that the OP take a look at the beta software
to see if it would fit. I didn't suggest that it was the only possible
answer, or even that it applied to their problem... simply to take a look.
Mr. Bailo has made some good contributions with some technical merit. For
that, I credit him. In this thread, he's been OK. On other threads,
including some recent ones, he has intentionally posted 'troll threads'
where he will make an intentionally opinionated non-technical statement that
he cross-posts to the linux advocacy group. As a result, I have no desire
to engage Mr. Bailo in any kind of direct conversation, regardless of the
merit of his statements. A person that I do not know gets a basic level of
respect, that is theirs to lose. He has lost that respect.
--
--- Nick Malik [Microsoft]
MCSD, CFPS, Certified Scrummaster
http://blogs.msdn.com/nickmalik
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this forum are my own, and not
representative of my employer.
I do not answer questions on behalf of my employer. I'm just a
programmer helping programmers.
--
"Cor Ligthert [MVP]" <no************@planet.nl> wrote in message
news:uO**************@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
Nick,
I don't see what is wrong that John, gives his opinion. He tells it
directly how he thinks it is. You can read it as; it is just rude arguing
without sense. You can read it as a warning to others and Microsoft that
*he* wants more consistency.
I keep it that he means the last.
(While I don't agree with him, VS 2005 is a product still in its
developing phase. That means for me every time evaluations of what you did
and because you do that be open to renew it until the last moment of
release)
Just my thought,
Cor