>>MSXML 3 also implements a WD (working draft) version published before XSLT
1.0 became a standard
This is not true. MSXML3 was first released on web in Oct 2000 and it did
implement full XSLT which was a recommendation in 1999.
I guess you are referring to the first version of MSXML which implemented a
WD of XSL 1.0 not XSLT.
Daniel, What are those things where you are seeing the differences between
the 2 transform techniques ?
Pranav Kandula
"Martin Honnen" <ma*******@yahoo.de> wrote in message
news:ex**************@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
Daniel wrote:
Are the differences between MSXML and .Net XSL transformation documented
online anywhere? Many of my XSL's work in MSXML but transform
differently in .Net XSL transformation.
Both MSXML 3 and MSXML 4 and .NET implement XSLT 1.0 and XPath 1.0 thus
as long as you are using a stylesheet in the namespace
http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform
and stick to the standard there shouldn't be any differences.
MSXML 3 also implements a WD (working draft) version published before
XSLT 1.0 became a standard, if you have stylesheets conforming with that
working draft then they are useless with .NET unless you rewrite them to
comply with the XSLT 1.0 standard.
--
Martin Honnen
http://JavaScript.FAQTs.com/