By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
444,246 Members | 1,515 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 444,246 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

Getting Third Party Component Suppliers to support NUnit and NUnitASP to support test driven development in web pages

P: n/a

I've been using NUnitASP and found that it reaches it's limits very quickly.
It has problems with parsing certain pages and raises errors for these when
perhaps it shouldn't. Another downside is that it only supports the out of
the box Microsoft controls.

The people who are producing NUnitASP haven't been able to create another
release for almost a year now. I was thinking how an impetus good be given
to them to improve it and keep working on it.

One such way would be to encourage makers of ASP.NET Web Controls to supply
tester objects to be used with NUnitASP. For example I have been using
ComponentOne's Suite and found it to be quite good. However I'd like to
unit test the web pages with NUnitASP. I have asked ComponentOne to supply
tester objects to be used with NUnitASP. IF third party suppliers supply
support for unit testing then I think this will help generate the support
needed to improve NUnitASP. Perhaps if it where funded to be maintained
then we can get a better product and more reliability in testing of web

Interested to also hear about any other thoughts on this. Does anyone else
to something different with testing web pages. We can ceratinly unit test
our classes but I'd like to get the web page unit tested.



O Nick Zdunic BSc (Hons)
O Systems Analyst
O Strategic Systems (WA) Pty Ltd
O mobile: +61 [0]4 126 480 88
O work: +61 [0]8 9457 3664
O fax: +61 [0]8 9457 3665
O email: ni**
O EP methodology - Innovative techniques that work...
O Time Master - Essential time management made easy...

Jul 21 '05 #1
Share this question for a faster answer!
Share on Google+

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.