473,725 Members | 1,982 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
+ Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Calling unmanaged code from managed MFC worker thread

Hi,

I have an existing VC 6 MFC application which communicates asynchronly with
a VC 2005 managed code dll.
I use an unmanaged base class with virtual functions to access methods in
the MFC application.
Furthermore, I use a pointer to an unmanaged function to jump back into the
managed dll.

The managed part is basically a remoting enhancement which asynchronly
initiates a call from the remoting thread to the MFC application. The
information is collected within the main thread of the MFC application. The
managed code dll is invoked via a function pointer. From the managed code
additional calls to the unmanaged MFC application will be done via a pointer
to an object in the MFC. When this code is executed within the main thread
of the MFC application everything works fine.

However, if I switch to a MFC worker thread, calls via the base class
pointer results in System.AccessVi olationExceptio n!

Scenario, which works:
1. Remoting thread imvoked
2. Managed DLL -MFC App asynchron, no result
3. Switch thread to App main thread
4. MFC App -Managed DLL
5. Managed DLL -MFC App (synchron)

Scenario, which does not work:
1. Remoting thread imvoked
2. Managed DLL -MFC App (asynchron, no result)
3. Switch thread to MFC worker thread!!!
4. MFC App -Managed DLL
5. Managed DLL -MFC App (synchron): System.AccessVi olationExceptio n !!

How can I access pointer to unmanaged classes from managed code within a
worker thread?

Best regards,
Klaus
Aug 1 '07 #1
3 4709
On Aug 1, 12:34 pm, "Klaus" <Kl...@nowhere. invalidwrote:
Hi,

I have an existing VC 6 MFC application which communicates asynchronly with
a VC 2005 managed code dll.
I use an unmanaged base class with virtual functions to access methods in
the MFC application.
Furthermore, I use a pointer to an unmanaged function to jump back into the
managed dll.

The managed part is basically a remoting enhancement which asynchronly
initiates a call from the remoting thread to the MFC application. The
information is collected within the main thread of the MFC application. The
managed code dll is invoked via a function pointer. From the managed code
additional calls to the unmanaged MFC application will be done via a pointer
to an object in the MFC. When this code is executed within the main thread
of the MFC application everything works fine.

However, if I switch to a MFC worker thread, calls via the base class
pointer results in System.AccessVi olationExceptio n!

Scenario, which works:
1. Remoting thread imvoked
2. Managed DLL -MFC App asynchron, no result
3. Switch thread to App main thread
4. MFC App -Managed DLL
5. Managed DLL -MFC App (synchron)

Scenario, which does not work:
1. Remoting thread imvoked
2. Managed DLL -MFC App (asynchron, no result)
3. Switch thread to MFC worker thread!!!
4. MFC App -Managed DLL
5. Managed DLL -MFC App (synchron): System.AccessVi olationExceptio n !!

How can I access pointer to unmanaged classes from managed code within a
worker thread?

Best regards,
Klaus

Hi, Klaus,

I assume you are already using delegates, and marshaling of delegate
method pointers to access unmanaged functions from managed code,
correct?

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bfeyhsdy.aspx


Aug 1 '07 #2
Thanks for your help!

Here is the code:
myHeader.h, shared in both projects, MFC 6.0 App and VC 2005 DLL:
class CMyBase
{
public:
CMyBase() {};
virtual ~CMyBase() {};
virtual bool MyExample() = 0;
};

In MFC App this class will be derived:
class CMyBaseDerived : public CMyBase
{
public:
CMyBaseDerived( );
virtual ~CMyBaseDerived ();
virtual bool MyExample();
};

In VC2005, I have a pointer to the instance of CMyBaseDerived:
CMyBase *PMyBase;
This pointer will be initialized by calling a function in the DLL from the
App:
void MyInit(CMyBase *p)
{
PMyBase = p;
}

When I use this pointer in the DLL from the MFC worker thread an
AccessViolation Exception will be thrown:
PMyBase->MyExample();

Using this pointer within the main thread no problem occurs.

Best regards,
Klaus
"Pixel.to.l ife" <pi***********@ gmail.comwrote in message
news:11******** **************@ i38g2000prf.goo glegroups.com.. .
On Aug 1, 12:34 pm, "Klaus" <Kl...@nowhere. invalidwrote:
>Hi,

I have an existing VC 6 MFC application which communicates asynchronly
with
a VC 2005 managed code dll.
I use an unmanaged base class with virtual functions to access methods in
the MFC application.
Furthermore, I use a pointer to an unmanaged function to jump back into
the
managed dll.

The managed part is basically a remoting enhancement which asynchronly
initiates a call from the remoting thread to the MFC application. The
information is collected within the main thread of the MFC application.
The
managed code dll is invoked via a function pointer. From the managed code
additional calls to the unmanaged MFC application will be done via a
pointer
to an object in the MFC. When this code is executed within the main
thread
of the MFC application everything works fine.

However, if I switch to a MFC worker thread, calls via the base class
pointer results in System.AccessVi olationExceptio n!

Scenario, which works:
1. Remoting thread imvoked
2. Managed DLL -MFC App asynchron, no result
3. Switch thread to App main thread
4. MFC App -Managed DLL
5. Managed DLL -MFC App (synchron)

Scenario, which does not work:
1. Remoting thread imvoked
2. Managed DLL -MFC App (asynchron, no result)
3. Switch thread to MFC worker thread!!!
4. MFC App -Managed DLL
5. Managed DLL -MFC App (synchron): System.AccessVi olationExceptio n !!

How can I access pointer to unmanaged classes from managed code within a
worker thread?

Best regards,
Klaus


Hi, Klaus,

I assume you are already using delegates, and marshaling of delegate
method pointers to access unmanaged functions from managed code,
correct?

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bfeyhsdy.aspx


Aug 2 '07 #3
On Aug 2, 2:14 am, "Klaus" <Kl...@nowhere. invalidwrote:
Thanks for your help!

Here is the code:
myHeader.h, shared in both projects, MFC 6.0 App and VC 2005 DLL:
class CMyBase
{
public:
CMyBase() {};
virtual ~CMyBase() {};
virtual bool MyExample() = 0;

};

In MFC App this class will be derived:
class CMyBaseDerived : public CMyBase
{
public:
CMyBaseDerived( );
virtual ~CMyBaseDerived ();
virtual bool MyExample();

};

In VC2005, I have a pointer to the instance of CMyBaseDerived:
CMyBase *PMyBase;
This pointer will be initialized by calling a function in the DLL from the
App:
void MyInit(CMyBase *p)
{
PMyBase = p;

}

When I use this pointer in the DLL from the MFC worker thread an
AccessViolation Exception will be thrown:
PMyBase->MyExample();

Using this pointer within the main thread no problem occurs.

Best regards,
Klaus

"Pixel.to.l ife" <pixel.to.l...@ gmail.comwrote in message

news:11******** **************@ i38g2000prf.goo glegroups.com.. .
On Aug 1, 12:34 pm, "Klaus" <Kl...@nowhere. invalidwrote:
Hi,
I have an existing VC 6 MFC application which communicates asynchronly
with
a VC 2005 managed code dll.
I use an unmanaged base class with virtual functions to access methods in
the MFC application.
Furthermore, I use a pointer to an unmanaged function to jump back into
the
managed dll.
The managed part is basically a remoting enhancement which asynchronly
initiates a call from the remoting thread to the MFC application. The
information is collected within the main thread of the MFC application.
The
managed code dll is invoked via a function pointer. From the managed code
additional calls to the unmanaged MFC application will be done via a
pointer
to an object in the MFC. When this code is executed within the main
thread
of the MFC application everything works fine.
However, if I switch to a MFC worker thread, calls via the base class
pointer results in System.AccessVi olationExceptio n!
Scenario, which works:
1. Remoting thread imvoked
2. Managed DLL -MFC App asynchron, no result
3. Switch thread to App main thread
4. MFC App -Managed DLL
5. Managed DLL -MFC App (synchron)
Scenario, which does not work:
1. Remoting thread imvoked
2. Managed DLL -MFC App (asynchron, no result)
3. Switch thread to MFC worker thread!!!
4. MFC App -Managed DLL
5. Managed DLL -MFC App (synchron): System.AccessVi olationExceptio n !!
How can I access pointer to unmanaged classes from managed code within a
worker thread?
Best regards,
Klaus
Hi, Klaus,
I assume you are already using delegates, and marshaling of delegate
method pointers to access unmanaged functions from managed code,
correct?
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bfeyhsdy.aspx- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Klaus,

First of all, it doesnt not seem like your MFC app is a managed
aplpication. Do you compile it with /clr command line option?
If you are using only MFC, why do you need to build a managed
application?

Secondly, do you have the method MyExample() overridden in
CMyBaseDerived?

Thirdly, assuming you have MyExample() overridden in CMyBaseDerived,
dont you have to cast PMyBase to a pointer to the derived object?
Virtual method references are resolved at run time, so unless the
machine knows the object is of derived type, it would look for the
method's definition ion the base class (
http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lit....html#faq-20.3
).. and if you dont have an implementation of MyExample() in the base
class, you will get an access violation.. no matter in managed/
unmanaged code.

Pardon me if I missed something.

Aug 3 '07 #4

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

0
1603
by: Ted Miller | last post by:
Hi folks, I originally posted this on microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.interop. Reposting to broaden the audience. I'm having an interop problem where my managed component is reentered from COM on the wrong thread, at which point things seem to go downhill very rapidly. I'm successfully making very heavy use of COM interop elsewhere in my C# code, but I'm having trouble finding a way around this particular problem. This is VS .Net 2003.
15
11787
by: Bryan | last post by:
I have a multi-threaded C# console application that uses WMI (System.Management namespace) to make RPC calls to several servers (600+ ) and returns ScheduledJobs. The section of my code that performs the query is contained in a delegate function that I execute via a second thread. On 1 or 2 of the 600+ servers the query hangs. I've tried to use Thread.Join() coupled with a Thread.Abort() but this does not kill the thread. Based on...
1
2908
by: Jesse McGrew | last post by:
Hi all, I'm trying to make a plugin DLL for a third-party application, using VC++ .NET 2003. This DLL acts as a bridge between the C++ plugin API of the application, and my actual plugin code written in C#. When the app calls my unmanaged functions, they work fine. But as soon as my unmanaged functions call managed functions (in the same source file!), the app reports an "unknown exception" error.
4
5722
by: William F. Kinsley | last post by:
My understanding is that when I re-compile a existing MFC application with the /clr switch, that the code generated is managed(with some exceptions) but that the data isn't, i.e. not garbage collected. I also noticed that when replaced some of the existing MFC dialogs with managed winforms that everything is still running in the same app domain.( No context change) So my question is this, what are the performance differences in using...
1
2603
by: H.B. | last post by:
Hi, I need to make a function that can display data on my Managed C++ app and be called by an unmanaged C++ DLL. Something like : void Form1::Form1_Load(System::Object * sender, System::EventArgs * e) { MyDLLInit(MyAppDisplayFunction); }
2
1875
by: Marcus Kwok | last post by:
I have processing code (I'll call it the "model") written in native unmanaged pure C++, and I have put a GUI on top of it written using Windows Forms (.NET 1.1). The GUI is used to set the parameters for the model, and once all parameters are set and checked to be valid, I run the model. The model takes a long time to run, so I decided to run it in a background thread, and have it notify the GUI when it is complete. The GUI will then...
4
2020
by: Benny | last post by:
I am creating a thread via "new Thread(new ThreadStart(p.ThreadProc))", is it safe for ThreadProc to use GetMessage/TranslateMessage/DispatchMessage instead of DoEvents? What I would like to do is to have messages posted to ThreadProc and have ThreadProc process those messages (similar to using PostThreadMessage in unmanaged code). Thanks.
2
2980
by: interX | last post by:
Hi, I have a little problem with managed/unmanaged in Visual Studio 2005 (Compiler setting /clr). I need to overhand several function pointers from managed to unmanaged. These function pointers are stored in an unmanaged struct and this struct is then overhanded by reference to the unmanaged code (See code pieces below). I thought the way to go is to create a delegate, pin it via GCHandel::Alloc and use the function
7
2686
by: =?Utf-8?B?UVNJRGV2ZWxvcGVy?= | last post by:
I have a C# logging assembly with a static constructor and methods that is called from another C# Assembly that is used as a COM interface for a VB6 Application. Ideally I need to build a file name based on the name of the VB6 application. A second choice would be a file name based on the # COM interface assembly. I have tried calling Assembly.GetCallingAssembly() but this fails when I use the VB6 client. Is there a way to get this...
0
8887
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However, people are often confused as to whether an ONU can Work As a Router. In this blog post, we’ll explore What is ONU, What Is Router, ONU & Router’s main usage, and What is the difference between ONU and Router. Let’s take a closer look ! Part I. Meaning of...
0
9401
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers, it seems that the internal comparison operator "<=>" tries to promote arguments from unsigned to signed. This is as boiled down as I can make it. Here is my compilation command: g++-12 -std=c++20 -Wnarrowing bit_field.cpp Here is the code in...
1
9172
by: Hystou | last post by:
Overview: Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows Update option using the Control Panel or Settings app; it automatically checks for updates and installs any it finds, whether you like it or not. For most users, this new feature is actually very convenient. If you want to control the update process,...
0
9110
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each protocol has its own unique characteristics and advantages, but as a user who is planning to build a smart home system, I am a bit confused by the choice of these technologies. I'm particularly interested in Zigbee because I've heard it does some...
0
8095
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing, and deployment—without human intervention. Imagine an AI that can take a project description, break it down, write the code, debug it, and then launch it, all on its own.... Now, this would greatly impact the work of software developers. The idea...
0
6011
by: conductexam | last post by:
I have .net C# application in which I am extracting data from word file and save it in database particularly. To store word all data as it is I am converting the whole word file firstly in HTML and then checking html paragraph one by one. At the time of converting from word file to html my equations which are in the word document file was convert into image. Globals.ThisAddIn.Application.ActiveDocument.Select();...
0
4781
by: adsilva | last post by:
A Windows Forms form does not have the event Unload, like VB6. What one acts like?
2
2633
muto222
by: muto222 | last post by:
How can i add a mobile payment intergratation into php mysql website.
3
2156
bsmnconsultancy
by: bsmnconsultancy | last post by:
In today's digital era, a well-designed website is crucial for businesses looking to succeed. Whether you're a small business owner or a large corporation in Toronto, having a strong online presence can significantly impact your brand's success. BSMN Consultancy, a leader in Website Development in Toronto offers valuable insights into creating effective websites that not only look great but also perform exceptionally well. In this comprehensive...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.