This query is running REAL slow ... like 1.2 secs ... any ideas on how
I could optimize it? Perhaps my indexes are incorrect?
$this->query = "SELECT m.username as username,
e.title as title,
e.exhibition_id as
exhibition_id,
LEFT(e.text,50) as
text,
e.random_key,
e.server_id,
e.datetime_created as
datetime,
e.views as views,
a.title as
album_title,
a.album_id as
album_id,
o.subdomain as
subdomain,
ss.symbol as symbol,
COUNT(DISTINCT
erg.exhibitions_rating_general_id) AS num_ratings,
AVG(erg.value) AS
rating,
COUNT(DISTINCT
ef.exhibitions_favorite_id) AS num_favorites,
COUNT(DISTINCT
c.comment_id) AS num_comments
FROM ".$CONFIG['tbl_exhibitions']." e,"
.$CONFIG['tbl_albums']." a,"
.$CONFIG['tbl_members']." m,"
.$CONFIG['tbl_organizations']." o,"
.$CONFIG['tbl_s_symbols']." ss
LEFT JOIN
".$CONFIG['tbl_exhibitions_rating_general']." erg
ON erg.exhibition_id = e.exhibition_id
LEFT JOIN
".$CONFIG['tbl_exhibitions_favorites']." ef
ON ef.exhibition_id = e.exhibition_id
LEFT JOIN ".$CONFIG['tbl_comments']." c
ON ( c.reference_id = e.exhibition_id
AND
c.type_id = 4 )
WHERE m.organization_id = $organization_id
AND e.album_id = a.album_id
AND e.datetime_created > now() -
interval 50 day
AND m.organization_id =
o.organization_id
AND m.symbol_id = ss.symbol_id
AND e.member_id = m.member_id
AND (e.scope_id = 5 OR e.scope_id = 3)
AND e.active = $active
AND m.active = $active
GROUP BY erg.exhibition_id
ORDER BY $order $sort";
+-------+--------+-----------------------------------+---------------+---------+-----------------+-------+---------------------------------+
| table | type | possible_keys | key |
key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+-------+--------+-----------------------------------+---------------+---------+-----------------+-------+---------------------------------+
| o | const | PRIMARY | PRIMARY |
2 | const | 1 | Using temporary; Using filesort |
| e | ALL | member_id | NULL |
NULL | NULL | 12034 | Using where |
| a | eq_ref | PRIMARY | PRIMARY |
2 | e.album_id | 1 | |
| m | eq_ref | PRIMARY,symbol_id,organization_id | PRIMARY |
3 | e.member_id | 1 | Using where |
| ss | eq_ref | PRIMARY,symbol_id | PRIMARY |
2 | m.symbol_id | 1 | |
| erg | ref | exhibition_id | exhibition_id |
4 | e.exhibition_id | 1 | |
| ef | ref | exhibition_id | exhibition_id |
4 | e.exhibition_id | 1 | |
| c | ref | type_id,reference_id | reference_id |
4 | e.exhibition_id | 10 | |
+-------+--------+-----------------------------------+---------------+---------+-----------------+-------+---------------------------------+
CREATE TABLE journals (
journal_id smallint(10) NOT NULL auto_increment,
member_id smallint(7) NOT NULL default '0',
title varchar(100) NOT NULL default '',
text text NOT NULL,
reference_link varchar(100) NOT NULL default '',
location varchar(100) NOT NULL default '',
scope_id tinyint(4) NOT NULL default '5',
group_id1 int(7) NOT NULL default '0',
group_id2 mediumint(7) NOT NULL default '0',
group_id3 int(7) NOT NULL default '0',
datetime_created datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
datetime_modified datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
PRIMARY KEY (journal_id),
KEY group_id1 (group_id1,group_id2,group_id3),
KEY member_id (member_id),
FULLTEXT KEY text (text)
) TYPE=MyISAM;
CREATE TABLE `comments` (
`comment_id` int(10) NOT NULL auto_increment,
`member_id` int(10) NOT NULL default '0',
`reference_id` int(10) NOT NULL default '0',
`title` varchar(25) NOT NULL default '',
`text` text NOT NULL,
`datetime_created` datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
`datetime_modified` datetime NOT NULL default '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
`root_id` int(10) default NULL,
`type_id` char(1) NOT NULL default '',
`path` text NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`comment_id`),
KEY `member_id` (`member_id`),
KEY `root_id` (`root_id`),
KEY `type_id` (`type_id`,`datetime_created`),
KEY `reference_id` (`reference_id`,`type_id`)
) TYPE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=162949 ; 2 1387
ensnare wrote: This query is running REAL slow ... like 1.2 secs ... any ideas on how I could optimize it? Perhaps my indexes are incorrect?
It looks like you're trying to be too clever, using outer joins to find
a way to compute several aggregates at the same time as getting
non-aggregate data results. Don't do that!
Execute a separate query for each of your aggregate computations. That
is, pull the COUNT() and AVG() aggregates out of that monster query, and
do them each as a separate query.
Your SQL will become much easier to understand, much easier to maintain,
and I'm betting it will run much faster as separate queries than as one
hopelessly overcomplicated query.
Regards,
Bill K.
"Bill Karwin" wrote: ensnare wrote:
This query is running REAL slow ... like 1.2 secs ... any ideas
on how I could optimize it? Perhaps my indexes are incorrect? It looks like you’re trying to be too clever, using outer joins to find a way to compute several aggregates at the same time as getting non-aggregate data results. Don’t do that!
Execute a separate query for each of your aggregate computations. That is, pull the COUNT() and AVG() aggregates out of that monster
query, and do them each as a separate query.
Your SQL will become much easier to understand, much easier to maintain, and I’m betting it will run much faster as separate queries than as one hopelessly overcomplicated query.
Regards, Bill K.
I second Bill. This is the most complex query I have seen in my life.
Break it apart and time the components. You would have a much easier
time optimizing each component (building indecis, etc.). That is
easily done if you are running the query from a script (e.g. php), and
you will negligible performance penalty from the breakup.
-- http://www.dbForumz.com/ This article was posted by author's request
Articles individually checked for conformance to usenet standards
Topic URL: http://www.dbForumz.com/mySQL-Query-...ict139345.html
Visit Topic URL to contact author (reg. req'd). Report abuse: http://www.dbForumz.com/eform.php?p=466919 This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: ensnare |
last post by:
This query is running REAL slow ... like 1.2 secs ... any ideas on how
I could optimize it? Perhaps my indexes are incorrect?
$this->query = "SELECT m.username as username,
e.title as title,...
|
by: AC Slater |
last post by:
Whats the simplest way to change a single stored procedures query
optimization level?
In UDB8 that is.
/F
|
by: Sean C. |
last post by:
Helpful folks,
I have recently migrated our test server, which runs Win NT 4, from
V7.2 FP11 to V8.1.3. Just about everything works wondefully, except I
am having major problems getting the...
|
by: Eugene |
last post by:
I am trying to set query optimization class in a simple SQL UDF like
this:
CREATE FUNCTION udftest ( in_item_id INT )
SPECIFIC udftest
MODIFIES SQL DATA
RETURNS TABLE( location_id INT,...
|
by: WantedToBeDBA |
last post by:
Hi all,
db2 => create table emp(empno int not null primary key, \
db2 (cont.) => sex char(1) not null constraint s_check check \
db2 (cont.) => (sex in ('m','f')) \
db2 (cont.) => not enforced...
|
by: 73blazer |
last post by:
We are migrating a customer from Version 7.1 FP3, to Version 8.2 (8.1 FP8).
For the most part, things are faster, but there is one query that is
much much slower, and it is a query that is used all...
|
by: UnixSlaxer |
last post by:
Hello,
Running a query for the first time on DB2 takes a fixed amount of time.
But when query is executed for the second time, the amount of time is
usually less since the query is (most...
|
by: Bernard Dhooghe |
last post by:
To retrieve data from a query where multiple rows can be returned, a
cursor can be used.
Different programming interface exist for cursors: embedded SQL, CLI,
SQL PL, SQLJ, JDBC.
I we look at...
|
by: ADezii |
last post by:
One frequently asked question at TheScripts is "Should I use a Stored Query or an SQL Statement in those situations that require a Query (RecordSets, RecordSources, Append, Delete, Update Operations,...
|
by: Don Li |
last post by:
Hi,
Env: MS SQL Server 2000
DB Info (sorry no DDL nor sample data):
tblA has 147249 rows -- clustered index on pk (one key of
datatype(int)) and
has two clumns, both are being used in joins;...
|
by: Charles Arthur |
last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
| |