I have replication set up across four mySQL databases (4.0.12) on different
servers. Master Server A replicates to B. Then B replicates to C and D.
Servers B, C and D serve the web pages through a load balancer. The
replication fails about once a week on B, C or D... Here is the most recent
failure on D....
THE MASTER 'A' SUBMITTED THE FOLLOWING SQL +++++++++++
INSERT INTO tmp_ftr_coll VALUES
('/features/2003/07/04_galballye_riverbarges', '2003-07-02', 'Water Wars:
Barge business', 'The Missouri and the Mississippi Rivers meet in St. Louis.
It\'s a popular port crammed with barges. Most take their loads down the
Mississippi. While each year a smaller number of barges navigate along the
Missouri. At one time planners thought both rivers would become commercial
arteries for the nation. But as the decades drag on the Mississippi has
become busier. Now it carries 30 times as much freight as the Missouri. ',
'', '', 44, '', '99999999999999', 'N', 4395, 6, 1);
THE SLAVE 'B' RECEIVED THE SAME SQL IN relay-bin. THE SQL WAS ALSO POSTED OK
FROM 'B' TO SLAVE 'C'. THEREFORE SERVERS 'B' AND 'C' WERE OK....
HOWEVER SLAVE 'D' GOT THE FOLLOWING SQL from 'B'++++++++++++++++++++...
ERROR: Error in Log_event::read_log_event(): 'Event too big',
data_len=1163087433,event_type=95
ERROR: Could not read entry at offset 272232869 : Error in log format or
read error
INSERT INTO tmp_ftr_coll VALUES
('/features/2003/07/04_galballye_riverbarges', '2003-07-02', 'Water Wars:
Barge business', 'The Missouri and the Mississippi Rivers meet in St. Louis.
It\'s ö+?
ûÇh
content_mgtINSERT
INTO tmp_ftr_coll VALUES ('/features/2003/03/19_losurem_prairieisland',
'2003-03-17', 'Federal regulators deny Xcel\'s application to build a
private nuclear waste storage facility ', 'Federal regulators have denied
Xcel\'s application to build a private nuclear waste storage facility ', '',
'', 94, '', '99999999999999', 'N', 3697, 6, 1)ö+?
²Çh ak]$
con;
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Another peculiar thing that I noticed is that for one insert on server 'A',
I see 29 entries in the relay-bin on server 'B', 232 entries in relay-bin of
server 'C' and 171 on 'D'. I cannot explain this phenomena...
Any thoughts on what could be wrong? Thanks.
