469,281 Members | 2,450 Online
Bytes | Developer Community
New Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Post your question to a community of 469,281 developers. It's quick & easy.

faq link problem?

Hi

When I clicked on this link " W3 DOM FAQ http://www.w3.org/DOM/faq " in Section
2.9 of the FAQ in NN7 all I got was the style sheet.
--

Phil Newcombe - philn?telus?net

http://www3.telus.net.bikim

Jul 20 '05 #1
6 1733
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 20:13:37 GMT, Phil N <ph***@telus.net> wrote:
Hi

When I clicked on this link " W3 DOM FAQ http://www.w3.org/DOM/faq " in Section
2.9 of the FAQ in NN7 all I got was the style sheet.


You must have some pretty odd accept headers, the does
content-negotiated XHTML/XML/HTML formats, at a guess, you're using an
clueless browser like mozilla which prefers XML it's not got a clue
how to render to HTML.

Get a better browser, or tweak your Accept headers to something more
appropriate.

There's a bugzilla bug about this somewhere.

Jim.
--
comp.lang.javascript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq/

Jul 20 '05 #2
Thanks.

I'm using NN7.02 right now, I've tried 7.1 and Mozilla but they both
seemed to act funny wint W98.

If NN7 likes xml that's OK with me 'cause I was just thinking last night
that you don't learn to fix Model T's if you want to be a mechanic so I
figure xml is where the future's going - HTML is going the other way.

So, anyway, to show you how much I know - can I tweak my accept headers
in NN7? a prefs file?

phil n
*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
Jul 20 '05 #3

"Jim Ley" <ji*@jibbering.com> schreef in bericht
news:3f***************@news.cis.dfn.de...
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 20:13:37 GMT, Phil N <ph***@telus.net> wrote:
Hi

When I clicked on this link " W3 DOM FAQ http://www.w3.org/DOM/faq " in Section2.9 of the FAQ in NN7 all I got was the style sheet.


You must have some pretty odd accept headers, the does
content-negotiated XHTML/XML/HTML formats, at a guess, you're using an
clueless browser like mozilla which prefers XML it's not got a clue
how to render to HTML.

Get a better browser, or tweak your Accept headers to something more
appropriate.


A more convenient solution would be to print the correct link in the faq:
http://www.w3.org/DOM/faq.html
JW

Jul 20 '05 #4
Janwillem Borleffs wrote:

A more convenient solution would be to print the correct link in the faq:
http://www.w3.org/DOM/faq.html
JW

Thanks for that too.
--

Phil Newcombe - philn?telus?net

http://www3.telus.net.bikim
- mozilla-win32-svg-mathml

Jul 20 '05 #5

"Jim Ley" <ji*@jibbering.com> schreef in bericht
news:3f***************@news.cis.dfn.de...
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 22:58:09 +0200, "Janwillem Borleffs"
<jw*@jwbfoto.demon.nl> wrote:
A more convenient solution would be to print the correct link in the faq:
http://www.w3.org/DOM/faq.html


That is not the correct link though, that's the link to the HTML
representation, why should I link to that when users of non-HTML
browsers might want to view the page?


Non-HTML browsers?

JW

Jul 20 '05 #6
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 23:06:18 +0200, "Janwillem Borleffs"
<jw*@jwbfoto.demon.nl> wrote:

"Jim Ley" <ji*@jibbering.com> schreef in bericht
news:3f***************@news.cis.dfn.de...
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 22:58:09 +0200, "Janwillem Borleffs"
<jw*@jwbfoto.demon.nl> wrote:
>A more convenient solution would be to print the correct link in the faq:
>http://www.w3.org/DOM/faq.html


That is not the correct link though, that's the link to the HTML
representation, why should I link to that when users of non-HTML
browsers might want to view the page?


Non-HTML browsers?


There's a number of WML only browsers available and at least one which
is XHTML only. As well as UA's such as Batik which are SVG specific.

(the WML and SVG don't currently have representations of the DOM faq
though)

Jim.
--
comp.lang.javascript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq/

Jul 20 '05 #7

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.

Similar topics

6 posts views Thread by SeaPlusPlus | last post: by
7 posts views Thread by Shawn Windle | last post: by
8 posts views Thread by CHouck | last post: by
3 posts views Thread by joseluismarchetti | last post: by
14 posts views Thread by Steve McLellan | last post: by
3 posts views Thread by nick | last post: by
7 posts views Thread by Kurda Yon | last post: by
9 posts views Thread by newbiegalore | last post: by
1 post views Thread by CARIGAR | last post: by
reply views Thread by suresh191 | last post: by
By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.