By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
424,850 Members | 1,985 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 424,850 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

FAQ Topic - What does the future hold for EcmaScript? (2008-10-07)

P: n/a
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FAQ Topic - What does the future hold for EcmaScript?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

The EcmaScript Technical Committee is now working on the fourth
edition, the first implementation of which is JScript.NET. It
includes a compiler, allowing you to create standalone JScript
executables.

The fourth edition of EcmaScript will provide new features like
typed variables, and classes. More information can be found at:

http://www.ecmascript.org/

or from microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.jscript
--
Postings such as this are automatically sent once a day. Their
goal is to answer repeated questions, and to offer the content to
the community for continuous evaluation/improvement. The complete
comp.lang.javascript FAQ is at http://jibbering.com/faq/index.html.
The FAQ workers are a group of volunteers. The sendings of these
daily posts are proficiently hosted by http://www.pair.com.

Oct 6 '08 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
1 Reply


P: n/a
FAQ server wrote:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FAQ Topic - What does the future hold for EcmaScript?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

The EcmaScript Technical Committee is now working on the fourth
edition, the first implementation of which is JScript.NET. It
includes a compiler, allowing you to create standalone JScript
executables.

The fourth edition of EcmaScript will provide new features like
typed variables, and classes. More information can be found at:

http://www.ecmascript.org/

or from microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.jscript

This information is not accurate. Are there any proposals?

Garrett
Oct 8 '08 #2

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.