help with RegEx

[Martin Nadoll]

hello,

i need a regular expression for my form-validation:

it should be allowed to fill a <input type="text"with

any iteger number up to 500
or
a integer number up to 500 followed by px (e.g. "200px")
or
a integer number up to 85 followed by % (e.g. "45%")

anything else should be returned false with a alert-message.
i'm not good in RegEx and i didn't find a example for that online.
maybe someone here can help me?

thanks a lot,
Martin Nadoll

[Bjoern Hoehrmann]

* Martin Nadoll wrote in comp.lang.javascript:

>i need a regular expression for my form-validation:

it should be allowed to fill a <input type="text"with

any iteger number up to 500
or
a integer number up to 500 followed by px (e.g. "200px")
or
a integer number up to 85 followed by % (e.g. "45%")

anything else should be returned false with a alert-message.
i'm not good in RegEx and i didn't find a example for that online.
maybe someone here can help me?

Unless you absolutely have to use a regular expression, this is best
done by converting the strings to a suitable number and check that
instead. A regex would look like

* 500 optionally followed by px, or
* 4 or 3 or 2 or 1 optionally followed
by 1 or 2 digits optionally followed by px, or
* ...

Which isn't particularily pretty in comparison (think about how to
change or proof-read it in the future).
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bj****@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: [phone] · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

[VK]

On Apr 26, 8:00 pm, "Martin Nadoll" <[e-mail]:

hello,

i need a regular expression for my form-validation:

it should be allowed to fill a <input type="text"with

any iteger number up to 500
or
a integer number up to 500 followed by px (e.g. "200px")
or
a integer number up to 85 followed by % (e.g. "45%")

anything else should be returned false with a alert-message.
i'm not good in RegEx and i didn't find a example for that online.

In such case maybe it is better to use straightforward if-else check
instead. The code you can understand is much easier to maintain and to
update plus much lesser risk of occasional typos.
n = document.forms['MyForm'].MyElement.value;

if ((+n < 0) || (parseInt(n) != +n)) {
return false;
}
if ((n.lastIndexOf('%') != -1) && (+n <= 85)) {
return true;
}
else if ((n.lastIndexOf('%') == -1) && (+n <= 500)) {
return true;
}
else {
return false;
}

[Evertjan.]

Martin Nadoll wrote on 26 apr 2008 in comp.lang.javascript:

hello,

i need a regular expression for my form-validation:

it should be allowed to fill a <input type="text"with

any iteger number up to 500
or
a integer number up to 500 followed by px (e.g. "200px")
or
a integer number up to 85 followed by % (e.g. "45%")

anything else should be returned false with a alert-message.
i'm not good in RegEx and i didn't find a example for that online.
maybe someone here can help me?

<script type='text/javascript'>

var re=/^(((500)|([1-4]\d\d)|([1-9]\d?))(px)?)$|^(((8[0-5])|([1-7]\d)|[1-
9])\%)$/;

function testMe(f){
if (re.test(f.elements['myField'].value))
return true;
alert('Something rotten in myField');
return false;
};

</script>

<form onsubmit='return testMe(this)'>
<input type="text" name='myField'>
</form>

=====================

It seems that the present mood is, that because Regex is unreadable for a
later moronic reviewer of your code, so should not be used.
I do not agree.
Perhaps the exploded view below provides additional explanation:

^
(
(
(500)|
([1-4]\d\d)|
([1-9]\d?)
)
(px)?
)
$
|
^
(
(
(8[0-5])|
([1-7]\d)|
[1-9]
)
\%
)
$

--
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[Dr J R Stockton]

In comp.lang.javascript message <48**********************@newsspool2.arc
or-online.net>, Sat, 26 Apr 2008 18:00:05, Martin Nadoll
<ma****@nadoll.deposted:

>hello,

i need a regular expression for my form-validation:

it should be allowed to fill a <input type="text"with

any iteger number up to 500
or
a integer number up to 500 followed by px (e.g. "200px")
or
a integer number up to 85 followed by % (e.g. "45%")

anything else should be returned false with a alert-message.
i'm not good in RegEx and i didn't find a example for that online.
maybe someone here can help me?

The best way is to RegExp-match the general pattern, of digits followed
optionally by px or %, followed by specific-to-case code. The .match
combines matching pattern, splitting into fields, ensuring non-negative.

Would 0240px be allowed? it fits your description.

Consider and test

var U

Num = Str = Max = U

Pattern = VALUE.match(/^(\d+)(%|px)?$/)
if (Pattern) {
Num = +Pattern[1] ; Str = Pattern[2]
Max = Str=="%" ? 85 : 500 }

A = [ !!Pattern, Max, Num, Str, Num<=Max ]

It's a good idea to read the newsgroup c.l.j and its FAQ. See below.

--
(c) John Stockton, nr London UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk IE7 FF2 Op9 Sf3
news:comp.lang.javascript FAQ <URL:http://www.jibbering.com/faq/index.html>.
<URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-index.htmjscr maths, dates, sources.
<URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/TP/BP/Delphi/jscr/&c, FAQ items, links.

[Lasse Reichstein Nielsen]

"Evertjan." <ex**************@interxnl.netwrites:

var re=/^(((500)|([1-4]\d\d)|([1-9]\d?))(px)?)$|^(((8[0-5])|([1-7]\d)|[1-
9])\%)$/;

Good example of why not to use RegExp's for numerical comparison :)
It's almost unreadable, and it still doesn't match 0px (although that
could be by design).

function testMe(f) {
var match = f.match(/^(\d+)(px|%)?$/);
if (!match) { return false; }
var num = +match[1];
switch(match[2]) {
case '%': return num <= 85;
case 'px':
default:
return num <= 500;
}
}

It seems that the present mood is, that because Regex is unreadable for a
later moronic reviewer of your code, so should not be used.

Not hard to read, but hard to modify too, although that is related.

I do not agree.

I do. Making code maintainable is important, to later "moronic
reviewers" (aka, your esteemed collegues and yourself in 30 days).

Try changing the limit from 85 to 125, and consider how many places
you need to change. Maintainable code should only need to change in
one place, where "85" is replaced by "125".

For added credit, I should have created them as constants instead
of inlined literals.

/L
--
Lasse Reichstein Nielsen - lr*@hotpop.com
DHTML Death Colors: <URL:http://www.infimum.dk/HTML/rasterTriangleDOM.html>
'Faith without judgement merely degrades the spirit divine.'

[Evertjan.]

Lasse Reichstein Nielsen wrote on 27 apr 2008 in comp.lang.javascript:

"Evertjan." <ex**************@interxnl.netwrites:

>var
re=/^(((500)|([1-4]\d\d)|([1-9]\d?))(px)?)$|^(((8[0-5])|([1-7]\d)|[1-
9])\%)$/;

Good example of why not to use RegExp's for numerical comparison :)
It's almost unreadable, and it still doesn't match 0px (although that
could be by design).

Tast was my design, it would be simpler without restricting the zero.

re=/^(((500)|([1-4]\d\d)|([1-9]?\d))(px)?)$|^(((8[0-5])|([1-7]?\d))\%)$/;

function testMe(f) {
var match = f.match(/^(\d+)(px|%)?$/);
if (!match) { return false; }
var num = +match[1];
switch(match[2]) {
case '%': return num <= 85;
case 'px':
default:
return num <= 500;
}
}

>It seems that the present mood is, that because Regex is unreadable
for a later moronic reviewer of your code, so should not be used.

Not hard to read, but hard to modify too, although that is related.

>I do not agree.

I do. Making code maintainable is important, to later "moronic
reviewers" (aka, your esteemed collegues and yourself in 30 days).

No, it is only important in your environment, but not in mine.

I, and many others I surmize, code for personal joy, compactness and
elegance, and mastering the Regex is a joy in itself.

I could not care less, if my code is unreadable if I am not around.
Throw it away, throw it away, throw it away!

After a few years I love to start from scratch and incorporate all the
new methods I learned or developed to get the same result perhaps in a
more elegant way.

Try changing the limit from 85 to 125, and consider how many places
you need to change. Maintainable code should only need to change in
one place, where "85" is replaced by "125".

Ah, an added challenge, I would like that.

OK, warn for lack of maintainability,
but don't dismiss the pleasure of such coding per se.

In my assembler days, each line had one or more comment lines to make it
readable, but those days are gone. Dreadfull sorry, Clementine? Perhaps.

However I am not even against the Javascript equivalents of the ancient
BASIC left(), mid(), right() and the less old instr(). With a lot of
code, you can get the same results.

3 or 4 years ago I could not "do" regex, and I didn't miss it, but you
never miss what you do not know.

--
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[Dr J R Stockton]

In comp.lang.javascript message <Xn*******************@194.109.133.242>,
Sat, 26 Apr 2008 19:10:11, Evertjan. <ex**************@interxnl.net>
posted:

>
var re=/^(((500)|([1-4]\d\d)|([1-9]\d?))(px)?)$|^(((8[0-5])|([1-7]\d)|[1-
9])\%)$/;

Rejects zero, which the OP's wording did not call for.

--
(c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05 MIME.
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/- FAQqish topics, acronyms & links;
Astro stuff via astron-1.htm, gravity0.htm ; quotings.htm, pascal.htm, etc.
No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News.

[Evertjan.]

Dr J R Stockton wrote on 27 apr 2008 in comp.lang.javascript:

In comp.lang.javascript message <Xn*******************@194.109.133.242>,
Sat, 26 Apr 2008 19:10:11, Evertjan. <ex**************@interxnl.net>
posted:

>>
var re=/^(((500)|([1-4]\d\d)|([1-9]\d?))(px)?)$|^(((8[0-5])|([1-7]\d)|[1-
9])\%)$/;

Rejects zero, which the OP's wording did not call for.

Methinks that is implicit, but the alternative was already posted:

re=/^(((500)|([1-4]\d\d)|([1-9]?\d))(px)?)$|^(((8[0-5])|([1-7]?\d))\%)$/;
--
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)