Doogie said the following on 6/18/2007 4:12 PM:
>Quote what you respond to so everyone can follow along without having to reference threads
that may not be available.
Why would a reference thread not be available (just curious).
Personally, I find the additional quotes annoying to parse through.
Because, in my case, I have already read the message you are replying to
(in fact, I wrote it). And since I have already read it, and not marked
it unread, Thunderbird doesn't show it to me anymore unless I go through
certain steps to view it again. Quoting what you are replying to
prevents that from ever happening.
>Also, just like Mr. Webb said, you need to worry about (valid) HTML.
Without it, JavaScript cannot behave consistently.
What is invalid about my html?
Good question :) Since you posted the server side code (which I said was
irrelevant) nobody would know what the browser got without having an
ASP.NET server to serve it to the browser to see. When posting code
here, post the resulting HTML and not the server code that generates it.
I created it directly from within .NET
I am not a big fan of the HTML that .NET produces.
by dumping the control onto my form and setting the visible property
to false (which is what I need). I need this control to be invisible
when the app starts, and then my javascript method will make it
visible or invisible depending on condtions. If I start with the
control visible and run through setting it's visibility in javascript
it works, but if I start with it invisible it does not work.
Then start with it visible and immediately hide it.
--
Randy
Chance Favors The Prepared Mind
comp.lang.javascript FAQ -
http://jibbering.com/faq/index.html
Javascript Best Practices -
http://www.JavascriptToolbox.com/bestpractices/