Strings as arrays

[Tim Streater]

Safari and FF seem to allow this:

var wiggy = "ABCD";

ch = wiggy[2]; // ch will contain the character 'C'

however my JS book seems to insist that I do this:

ch = wiggy.charAt(2);

and indeed doesn't appear to mention the first method at all.

Since for my particular purpose I want to treat the string as an array
of single characters, I prefer the first method rather than the second.
Is there any reason not to pursue this approach?

Thanks,

-- tim

[Tom Cole]

On Mar 6, 9:25 am, Tim Streater <[e-mail]:

Safari and FF seem to allow this:

var wiggy = "ABCD";

ch = wiggy[2]; // ch will contain the character 'C'

however my JS book seems to insist that I do this:

ch = wiggy.charAt(2);

and indeed doesn't appear to mention the first method at all.

Since for my particular purpose I want to treat the string as an array
of single characters, I prefer the first method rather than the second.
Is there any reason not to pursue this approach?

Thanks,

-- tim

Only if you wish to make your application inaccessible to IE users. It
returns [undefined] to them.

[Elegie]

Tim Streater wrote:

Hi,

Since for my particular purpose I want to treat the string as an array
of single characters, I prefer the first method rather than the second.
Is there any reason not to pursue this approach?

An excellent one: it is not part of ECMAScript 262, and as such, is not
something browser vendors have to implement.

If you don't want to use the 'chatAt' method, one alternative could be
to transform your string into an array, using the 'split' method.
Kind regards,
Elegie.

[Tim Streater]

In article <45*********************@news.free.fr>,
Elegie <el****@invalid.comwrote:

Tim Streater wrote:

Hi,

Since for my particular purpose I want to treat the string as an array
of single characters, I prefer the first method rather than the second.
Is there any reason not to pursue this approach?

An excellent one: it is not part of ECMAScript 262, and as such, is not
something browser vendors have to implement.

Hmm, yes, I rather thought that might be the case, but thanks for
confirming it.

If you don't want to use the 'charAt' method, one alternative could be
to transform your string into an array, using the 'split' method.

I'll probably just stick with charAt. I haven't started implementing
this part of my pages yet, but I want to have something I can treat as
an array while manipulating it, but pass as a single entity between
pages using something like:

document.forms['xxx'].timeslots.value = wiggy;
where I also have:

<form name='xxx'>
<input type=hidden name=timeslots>
</form>
(timeslots will go into a mysql table as char(64)).

-- tim

[Tim Streater]

In article <11*********************@j27g2000cwj.googlegroups. com>,
"Tom Cole" <tc****@gmail.comwrote:

On Mar 6, 9:25 am, Tim Streater <[e-mail]:

Safari and FF seem to allow this:

var wiggy = "ABCD";

ch = wiggy[2]; // ch will contain the character 'C'

however my JS book seems to insist that I do this:

ch = wiggy.charAt(2);

and indeed doesn't appear to mention the first method at all.

Since for my particular purpose I want to treat the string as an array
of single characters, I prefer the first method rather than the second.
Is there any reason not to pursue this approach?

Thanks,

-- tim

Only if you wish to make your application inaccessible to IE users. It
returns [undefined] to them.

Round here, I'd probably get applause for that :-)

-- tim

[Michael White]

Tim Streater wrote:

In article <45*********************@news.free.fr>,
Elegie <el****@invalid.comwrote:

>>Tim Streater wrote:

Hi,

>>>Since for my particular purpose I want to treat the string as an array
of single characters, I prefer the first method rather than the second.
Is there any reason not to pursue this approach?

An excellent one: it is not part of ECMAScript 262, and as such, is not
something browser vendors have to implement.

Hmm, yes, I rather thought that might be the case, but thanks for
confirming it.

>>If you don't want to use the 'charAt' method, one alternative could be
to transform your string into an array, using the 'split' method.

I'll probably just stick with charAt. I haven't started implementing
this part of my pages yet, but I want to have something I can treat as
an array while manipulating it, but pass as a single entity between
pages using something like:

document.forms['xxx'].timeslots.value = wiggy;

document.forms['xxx'].timeslots.value = "abc".split("");

Mick

where I also have:

<form name='xxx'>
<input type=hidden name=timeslots>
</form>
(timeslots will go into a mysql table as char(64)).

-- tim

[Tim Streater]

In article <45***********************@roadrunner.com>,
Michael White <mi**@mickweb.comwrote:

Tim Streater wrote:

In article <45*********************@news.free.fr>,
Elegie <el****@invalid.comwrote:

>Tim Streater wrote:

Hi,
Since for my particular purpose I want to treat the string as an array
of single characters, I prefer the first method rather than the second.
Is there any reason not to pursue this approach?

An excellent one: it is not part of ECMAScript 262, and as such, is not
something browser vendors have to implement.

Hmm, yes, I rather thought that might be the case, but thanks for
confirming it.

>If you don't want to use the 'charAt' method, one alternative could be
to transform your string into an array, using the 'split' method.

I'll probably just stick with charAt. I haven't started implementing
this part of my pages yet, but I want to have something I can treat as
an array while manipulating it, but pass as a single entity between
pages using something like:

document.forms['xxx'].timeslots.value = wiggy;

document.forms['xxx'].timeslots.value = "abc".split("");

Mick

Mick,

Could you expand on this a little? Is there something actually wrong (in
the sense e.g. that it is non-standard, or some other issue) with it?
What I need is for the hidden variable timeslots in the form below to
get the value of the string wiggy.

Thanks -- tim

where I also have:

<form name='xxx'>
<input type=hidden name=timeslots>
</form>
(timeslots will go into a mysql table as char(64)).

-- tim

-- tim