In comp.lang.javascript message <L8********************@telcove.net>,
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:48:13, Randy Webb <Hi************@aol.composted:
>
What does the W3C Validator say about the same code? If the W3C
Validator doesn't complain but Tidy does then Tidy is the culprit, not
your HTML.
That may be so for Genuine Errors.
But :
(1) Tidy gives by default warnings which are not by default given by
<http://validator.w3.org/>.
(2) <http://validator.w3.org/gives up on at least one page - an ISP's
Home Page, forsooth - for which TIDY will happily report usefully on a
local copy. W3 hates characters not in the character set.
IMHO, it's worth using both. I have a batch file which runs TIDY and
various other tests (including checking for 8061) on any HTML page here
that's changed since the last time, stopping on error but otherwise
running to completion.
--
(c) John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05 MIME.
<URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/TP/BP/Delphi/&c., FAQqy topics & links;
<URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/clpb-faq.txt RAH Prins : c.l.p.b mFAQ;
<URL:ftp://garbo.uwasa.fi/pc/link/tsfaqp.zipTimo Salmi's Turbo Pascal FAQ.