http://pointedears.de/scripts/js-version-info

[Luke Matuszewski]

You could update your info from cards freely available at
<URL:http://www.dannyg.com/dl/JSB5RefBooklet.pdf> or
<URL:http://www.dannyg.com/dl/JSB5RefPoster.pdf>. It seems that it is
pretty good reference of Browser Object's.

[Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn]

Luke Matuszewski wrote:

You could update your info from cards freely available at
<URL:http://www.dannyg.com/dl/JSB5RefBooklet.pdf> or
<URL:http://www.dannyg.com/dl/JSB5RefPoster.pdf>. It seems that it is
pretty good reference of Browser Object's.

But I will not. For two reasons:

1. Goodman cannot be trusted regarding client-side scripting at all.
Proof can be found in this newsgroup.

2. By definition and purpose the JavaScript/JScript/ECMAScript Support
Matrix includes only core language objects and their properties.

Maybe I will set up another support matrix for host objects later.
PointedEars

[Patient Guy]

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <Po*********@web.de> wrote in
news:17****************@PointedEars.de:

Maybe I will set up another support matrix for host objects later.
PointedEars

You might want to clean up that web page referenced in the subject line.

The document does not validate with HTML (although it claims to do that
very thing!) and, sure enough, you have some overlapping CODE and SPAN
start and end tags in there.

For shame.

;-)

[Patient Guy]

Patient Guy <Pa*********@nowhere.to.be.found.com> wrote in
news:Xn******************@207.115.17.102:

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <Po*********@web.de> wrote in
news:17****************@PointedEars.de:

Maybe I will set up another support matrix for host objects later.
PointedEars

You might want to clean up that web page referenced in the subject line.

The document does not validate with HTML (although it claims to do that
very thing!) and, sure enough, you have some overlapping CODE and SPAN
start and end tags in there.

For shame.

;-)

Not to be all negative, I will say that the content of the document is
probably (certainly?) informative to those who worry about what code will
work in what version and whether to write wrapper code or test for the http
client in use (or both).

It's interesting to find people who have THAT much time on their hands and
actually spend it generally productively, which includes contemplating the
eternal verities that are and which surround JavaScript in all of its
various forms. And then being willing to share/impart this information to
others in a more or less esoteric way is commendable or considerably
commendable.