SpinChat

[Geoff]

How are some users are able to access the directsex.com chat server and have
full use of chat commands?

Directsex uses spinchat and the 3rd party spinchat software programs out
there allow one to connect to spinchat only, not other servers.

I copied the directsex html, applet section, saved it to my computer, loaded
it, and it connected. The applet code looks like the following:

<applet name="chat" code="de/spin/chat/small/ChatLoader.class"
codebase="http://chat1.directsex.com/classes/" archive="chat.jar"
width="360" height="340" align="top" VIEWASTEXT>
<param name="virtual" value="default">
<PARAM name="color" value="FFDE01">
<param name="properties"
value="http://chat1.directsex.com/membernew/properties2.txt">
<param name="language"
value="http://chat1.directsex.com/membernew/language.txt">
<param name="port" value="8001">
<param name="channel" value="College Girls">
<param name="nick" value="my name">
<param name="password" value="my password">
Please use a Java capable browser to use this chat!
</applet>
I changed the above to load loocal properties.txt and language.txt files. I
suspect the java that directsex uses does not allow loading of local files.
The language file is the file that needs to be changed to restore all the
commands:

<applet name="chat" code="de/spin/chat/small/ChatLoader.class"
codebase="http://chat1.directsex.com/classes/" archive="chat.jar"
width="500" height="300">
<param name="properties" value="properties.txt">
<param name="language" value="language.txt">
<param name="port" value="8001">
<param name="virtual" value="default">
<PARAM name="color" value="FFDE01">
<param name="port" value="8001">
<param name="channel" value="College Girls">
<param name="nick" value="my name">
<param name="password" value="my password">
Please use a Java capable browser to use this chat!
</applet>

The above did not work even tho I copied their language and properties
files. I also tried spinchat clients at the following addresses:

http://pluto.brain-killer.org/index-en.html
http://www.dulky.org/nozchat/

.. . . but these clients only allow one to connect to the spinchat server.
Not other sites that use spinchat. Spinchat demos can be seen at:

http://chat.spin.de/en/demos/index.shtml
Guess I am not smart enough to figure it out, lol, and yet, 2 people figured
it out, oh well.

-g

[Hywel Jenkins]

In article <0n*****************@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
no****@nospam.org says...

How are some users are able to access the directsex.com chat server and have
full use of chat commands?

Directsex uses spinchat and the 3rd party spinchat software programs out
there allow one to connect to spinchat only, not other servers.

I copied the directsex html, applet section, saved it to my computer, loaded
it, and it connected. The applet code looks like the following:

<applet name="chat" code="de/spin/chat/small/ChatLoader.class"
Guess I am not smart enough to figure it out, lol,

Obviously. You're not even smart enough to figure out the difference
between "JavaScript" and "Java".

--

Hywel
http://kibo.org.uk/

[Geoff]

> Obviously. You're not even smart enough to figure out the difference

between "JavaScript" and "Java".

Huh? What are you taking about? The chat applet is Java ding-dong and what
I posted is javascript. Try not to be an idiot next time.

-g

[Lasse Reichstein Nielsen]

"Geoff" <no****@nospam.org> writes:

Obviously. You're not even smart enough to figure out the difference
between "JavaScript" and "Java".
Huh? What are you taking about? The chat applet is Java ding-dong and what
I posted is javascript.

No, what you posted is HTML, more precisely, an applet element that loads
the "Java ding-dong" (aka. class). There was *no* Javascript in that post.
Try not to be an idiot next time.

/L
--
Lasse Reichstein Nielsen - lr*@hotpop.com
DHTML Death Colors: <URL:http://www.infimum.dk/HTML/rasterTriangleDOM.html>
'Faith without judgement merely degrades the spirit divine.'

[Geoff]

Hmmmmmmm, nice thread, forget it then . . .

I did not even use the word javascript in my original post and mr.idiot
said:

Obviously. You're not even smart enough to figure out the difference
between "JavaScript" and "Java".

.. . . and you say is it html. My original post said: I copied the directsex html, applet section, saved it to my computer,

loaded
Thanks for the useless replies.

Bye.

-g

[David Dorward]

Geoff wrote:

Obviously. You're not even smart enough to figure out the difference
between "JavaScript" and "Java".

Huh? What are you taking about? The chat applet is Java ding-dong and
what I posted is javascript.

No, what you posted is (deprecated) HTML for including a Java Applet in a
webpage. That is not JavaScript.

--
David Dorward <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Home is where the ~/.bashrc is

[Geoff]

I know, here is my other reply:

I did not even use the word javascript in my original post and mr.idiot
said:

Obviously. You're not even smart enough to figure out the difference
between "JavaScript" and "Java".

.. . . and you say is it html. My original post said:

I copied the directsex html, applet section, saved it to my computer, loaded
Thanks for the useless replies.

Bye.

-g

"David Dorward" <do*****@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dj*******************@news.demon.co.uk... Geoff wrote:
Obviously. You're not even smart enough to figure out the difference
between "JavaScript" and "Java".

Huh? What are you taking about? The chat applet is Java ding-dong and
what I posted is javascript.

No, what you posted is (deprecated) HTML for including a Java Applet in a
webpage. That is not JavaScript.

--
David Dorward <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Home is where the ~/.bashrc is

[Geoff]

> No, what you posted is (deprecated) HTML for including a Java Applet in a

webpage. That is not JavaScript.

My original post said, 'I copied the html . . .'

Thanks for the info tho.

Talk about a useless thread and useless replies.

HEY EVERYONE . . . HYWEL JENKINS MENTIONED JAVASCRIPT . . . POST SOME MORE
USELESS REPLIES . . .

TIA

-g

[David Dorward]

Geoff wrote:

HEY EVERYONE . . . HYWEL JENKINS MENTIONED JAVASCRIPT

.... because you posted in comp.lang.javascript, a newsgroup entirely about
JavaScript and not at all about Java.

(Follow-ups set to take it away from clj (its not about JavaScript) and dcc
(its not in German).)

--
David Dorward <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/> <http://dorward.me.uk/>
Home is where the ~/.bashrc is

[Gilbert]

> ... because you posted in comp.lang.javascript, a newsgroup entirely about

JavaScript and not at all about Java.

K, javascript has nothing to do with html, in fact, I have seen
modifications of the applet code using javascript but since the 2 are
separate, and are never used together, I guess it is pointless to post it
here.

Got to get up pretty early in the morning to fool old Hywel . . .

Good catch . . .

-g

[Lee]

Geoff said:

No, what you posted is (deprecated) HTML for including a Java Applet in a
webpage. That is not JavaScript.

My original post said, 'I copied the html . . .'

Thanks for the info tho.

Talk about a useless thread and useless replies.

HEY EVERYONE . . . HYWEL JENKINS MENTIONED JAVASCRIPT . . . POST SOME MORE
USELESS REPLIES . . .

You asked about a Java applet in a Javascript group and posted HTML.
When called for not knowing the difference between Java and Javascript,
you claimed that "what I posted is javascript." Please stop griping
and go find a Java newsgroup to annoy.

[Gilbert]

> You asked about a Java applet in a Javascript group and posted HTML.

When called for not knowing the difference between Java and Javascript,
you claimed that "what I posted is javascript." Please stop griping
and go find a Java newsgroup to annoy.

Yeah, you caught me, good catch . . .

-g

[Geoff]

> You asked about a Java applet in a Javascript group and posted HTML.

When called for not knowing the difference between Java and Javascript,
you claimed that "what I posted is javascript." Please stop griping
and go find a Java newsgroup to annoy.

Why go somewhere else? You seem to love to catch someone trying to pull a
fast one rather than post answers. I guess some groups are pretty useless.
However, just in case you might be interested in the subject or topic, below
is the code that came before the applet code, but I guess you are too short
sighted to see any relation to it (that is why I posted here also since it
may have some relevance, go back to your hole now):
<script language=JavaScript>
<!--

var message="Function Disabled!";

///////////////////////////////////
function clickIE4(){
if (event.button==2){
//alert(message);
return false;
}
}

function clickNS4(e){
if (document.layers||document.getElementById&&!docume nt.all){
if (e.which==2||e.which==3){
//alert(message);
return false;
}
}
}

if (document.layers){
document.captureEvents(Event.MOUSEDOWN);
document.onmousedown=clickNS4;
}
else if (document.all&&!document.getElementById){
document.onmousedown=clickIE4;
}

document.oncontextmenu=new Function("return false")

// -->
</script>

<SCRIPT language="javascript">
function cleanUp()
{
var allinfo=navigator.userAgent.toLowerCase();

if (allinfo.indexOf("msie") != -1)
{
parent.video.frmvid.stopped.value=0;
parent.video.videooperate(2);
//alert('Please click START VIDEO after chat is loaded');
}
}
</SCRIPT>

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1">
<title>DirectSex Chat</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="dsstyle.css">
</head>

<body onload="cleanUp();">
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="center"
width="384">
<tr>
<td width="363" valign="top" align="center" VALIGN="top">

<script language="JavaScript">
<!--
var chatwindowloaded = 1;
function sendMessage(){
document.chat.handleInput( document.inputForm.input.value);
document.inputForm.input.value = "";
return false;
}
-->
</script>
<FORM onSubmit="return sendMessage();" name="inputForm">

[Jambalaya]

Geoff wrote:

Why go somewhere else? You seem to love to catch someone trying to pull a
fast one rather than post answers. I guess some groups are pretty useless.
However, just in case you might be interested in the subject or topic, below
is the code that came before the applet code, but I guess you are too short
sighted to see any relation to it (that is why I posted here also since it
may have some relevance, go back to your hole now):

Whoa, this reminds me, the other day my lawnmower broke so I took it
down to the Volkswagen dealership for them to fix it. The nerve of
those people! Even after reminding them that my lawnmower has four
wheels and an engine just like their precious VW's they still insisted
I take it to the "proper repair shop." I mean c'mon, where do they get
off...

[Geoff]

"Jambalaya" <ch*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11*********************@f14g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...

Whoa, this reminds me, the other day my lawnmower broke so I took it
down to the Volkswagen dealership for them to fix it. The nerve of
those people! Even after reminding them that my lawnmower has four
wheels and an engine just like their precious VW's they still insisted
I take it to the "proper repair shop." I mean c'mon, where do they get
off...

Wheeeeeeeew, good catch, protecting the group, you remind me the guy who
top-posted and had a really good question but the only answers he got was
about the fact he top posted.

Keep up the good work, keep looking for those posters trying to sneak a bad
post in.

-g

[Lee]

Geoff said:

You asked about a Java applet in a Javascript group and posted HTML.
When called for not knowing the difference between Java and Javascript,
you claimed that "what I posted is javascript." Please stop griping
and go find a Java newsgroup to annoy.
Why go somewhere else?

You can stay here and whine like an idiot, or you can ask your
Java question in a Java group. It's up to you.
However, just in case you might be interested in the subject or topic, below
is the code that came before the applet code, but I guess you are too short
sighted to see any relation to it

So you think that just because your page contains some Javascript
BEFORE the code that you posted and were asking about, that it
makes sense to ask about it in a Javascript newsgroup?

[Jambalaya]

>> Whoa, this reminds me, the other day my lawnmower broke so I took it

down to the Volkswagen dealership for them to fix it. The nerve of
those people! Even after reminding them that my lawnmower has four
wheels and an engine just like their precious VW's they still insisted
I take it to the "proper repair shop." I mean c'mon, where do they get
off...

Wheeeeeeeew, good catch, protecting the group, you remind me the guy who
top-posted and had a really good question but the only answers he got was
about the fact he top posted.

Keep up the good work, keep looking for those posters trying to sneak a bad
post in.

Oh, I forgot to tell the best part. So, instead of going to a lawnmower
repair shop, I just stayed at the dealership and made fun of the
salespeople. I didn't care that I was wasting my time. I didn't have
anything better to do...

[Geoff]

> You can stay here and whine like an idiot

.. . . and what a good job I am doing, after all, I can learn from people
like you. You seem to be an expert at it.

So you think that just because your page contains some Javascript
BEFORE the code that you posted and were asking about, that it
makes sense to ask about it in a Javascript newsgroup?

Nope, the only thing I expect is more idiotic posts.

-g

[Geoff]

> Oh, I forgot to tell the best part.

Good, your post adds another page to my book, 'Idiots I have Known'.

-g

[Random]

Geoff wrote:

Nope, the only thing I expect is more idiotic posts.

-g

And, to be honest, that's all you can expect-- we're not Java folks. We
can't help you with Java.

Hanging out here and escalating the aggravation isn't going to get you
the help that you want/need-- it just isn't here to be had-- even if it
is entertaining for you.

We're not Java folk. We can't help you.

--
-r

[Geoff]

> We're not Java folk. We can't help you.

Yep, and if you bothered to look at anything, you would see that it is not a
Java question. It was an html and/or javascript question. Javascript
because the spinchat manual does have functions that can be called and have
a few javascript examples.

However, it seems pretty useless, so, I also top-posted . . . quick, reply
to it . . . the bastard top-posted. It is my fault for not realizing how
useless the group is.

-g
"Random" <ra*******@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@g47g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...

Geoff wrote:

Nope, the only thing I expect is more idiotic posts.

-g

And, to be honest, that's all you can expect-- we're not Java folks. We
can't help you with Java.

Hanging out here and escalating the aggravation isn't going to get you
the help that you want/need-- it just isn't here to be had-- even if it
is entertaining for you.

We're not Java folk. We can't help you.

--
-r

[Dag Sunde]

"Geoff" <sp**@spam.org> wrote in message
news:bC******************@newsread3.news.atl.earth link.net...

We're not Java folk. We can't help you.

Yep, and if you bothered to look at anything, you would see that it is not
a
Java question. It was an html and/or javascript question. Javascript
because the spinchat manual does have functions that can be called and
have
a few javascript examples.

However, it seems pretty useless, so, I also top-posted . . . quick, reply
to it . . . the bastard top-posted. It is my fault for not realizing how
useless the group is.

*PLONK*

--
Dag.

[Jambalaya]

> > Oh, I forgot to tell the best part.

Good, your post adds another page to my book, 'Idiots I have Known'.

-g

Sounds like an autobiography.

[Geoff]

Look, I top posted, go for it . . .

-g
"Jambalaya" <ch*********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11*********************@g14g2000cwa.googlegro ups.com...

Oh, I forgot to tell the best part.

Good, your post adds another page to my book, 'Idiots I have Known'.

-g

Sounds like an autobiography.