By jove! an answer to my dilemma perhaps?

[Richard]

http://www.codeave.com/javascript/image_click.html

With this guy's method of selecting an image, and displaying the results, I
do believe I can accomplish what I want now.

If my thinking is correct, I can just use a simple image swap to place the
output in the desired division?

Going one step farther, including a description with a mouse over before the
visitor clicks on the link.

Comments welcomed.

[Mick White]

Richard wrote:

http://www.codeave.com/javascript/image_click.html

With this guy's method of selecting an image, and displaying the results, I
do believe I can accomplish what I want now.

If my thinking is correct, I can just use a simple image swap to place the
output in the desired division?

Going one step farther, including a description with a mouse over before the
visitor clicks on the link.

The code could be optimized:

<img... onclick="document.images['large'].src=this.src">

That replaces 50 lines of code...
Mick

[Richard]

"Richard" <An*******@127.001> wrote in message
news:cs********@news2.newsguy.com...

http://www.codeave.com/javascript/image_click.html

With this guy's method of selecting an image, and displaying the results, I do believe I can accomplish what I want now.

If my thinking is correct, I can just use a simple image swap to place the
output in the desired division?

Going one step farther, including a description with a mouse over before the visitor clicks on the link.

Comments welcomed.

Working out quite well actually.
It is a basic image swap with a twist.
However, in the coding i want to show the full size image rather than just
another thumbnail.

if(clicks==0){document.images['large'].src=image0.src;}

What's the proper syntax for adding +big to the src code?
that is, this code displays "images/pic1.jpg" but I want to display
"images/pic1big.jpg" instead.

[Richard]

"Mick White" <mw***********@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:JN*********************@twister.nyroc.rr.com. ..

Richard wrote:

http://www.codeave.com/javascript/image_click.html

With this guy's method of selecting an image, and displaying the results, I do believe I can accomplish what I want now.

If my thinking is correct, I can just use a simple image swap to place the output in the desired division?

Going one step farther, including a description with a mouse over before the visitor clicks on the link.

The code could be optimized:

<img... onclick="document.images['large'].src=this.src">

That replaces 50 lines of code...
Mick

When learning, one takes it one step at a time.
I plan on cleaning up the code later after it all comes together the way I
want.
I could also put the click checking lines into a loop which would eliminate
a lot of repetitive coding.

[Mick White]

Richard wrote:

Working out quite well actually.
It is a basic image swap with a twist.
However, in the coding i want to show the full size image rather than just
another thumbnail.

if(clicks==0){document.images['large'].src=image0.src;}

What's the proper syntax for adding +big to the src code?
that is, this code displays "images/pic1.jpg" but I want to display
"images/pic1big.jpg" instead.

function image_click(clicks){
document.images['large'].src="images/pic"+clicks+"big.jpg"
}
No need for : if(clicks==0) etc. Just build the src string using the
"clicks" parameter, as above.

Mick

[Hywel Jenkins]

In article <cs********@news2.newsguy.com>, An*******@127.001 says...

"Mick White" <mw***********@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:JN*********************@twister.nyroc.rr.com. ..

Richard wrote:

http://www.codeave.com/javascript/image_click.html

With this guy's method of selecting an image, and displaying the results, I do believe I can accomplish what I want now.

If my thinking is correct, I can just use a simple image swap to place the output in the desired division?

Going one step farther, including a description with a mouse over before the visitor clicks on the link.

The code could be optimized:

<img... onclick="document.images['large'].src=this.src">

That replaces 50 lines of code...
Mick

When learning, one takes it one step at a time.

You're not learning though, are you, RtS? You're just borrowing code
from others far more talented that you.

--
Hywel http://kibo.org.uk/
I do not eat quiche.

[Richard]

"Mick White" <mw***********@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Zt*******************@twister.nyroc.rr.com...

Richard wrote:

Working out quite well actually.
It is a basic image swap with a twist.
However, in the coding i want to show the full size image rather than just another thumbnail.

if(clicks==0){document.images['large'].src=image0.src;}

What's the proper syntax for adding +big to the src code?
that is, this code displays "images/pic1.jpg" but I want to display
"images/pic1big.jpg" instead.

function image_click(clicks){
document.images['large'].src="images/pic"+clicks+"big.jpg"
}
No need for : if(clicks==0) etc. Just build the src string using the
"clicks" parameter, as above.

Mick

Thanks mike. I'll put that to good use.
I beleive the guy was merely showing the simplicity rather than the extreme.
He could have put it all in loops to make it easier.

[Richard]

"Hywel Jenkins" <hy**********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MP************************@news.individual.ne t...

In article <cs********@news2.newsguy.com>, An*******@127.001 says...

"Mick White" <mw***********@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:JN*********************@twister.nyroc.rr.com. ..

Richard wrote:

> http://www.codeave.com/javascript/image_click.html
>
> With this guy's method of selecting an image, and displaying the

results, I

> do believe I can accomplish what I want now.
>
> If my thinking is correct, I can just use a simple image swap to

place the

> output in the desired division?
>
> Going one step farther, including a description with a mouse over

before the

> visitor clicks on the link.
>

The code could be optimized:

<img... onclick="document.images['large'].src=this.src">

That replaces 50 lines of code...
Mick

When learning, one takes it one step at a time.

You're not learning though, are you, RtS? You're just borrowing code
from others far more talented that you.

Wellll duhhhhh. Don't we all?
"Borrowed" coding appears to be a fairly accepted on the web from what I've
seen so far.
Hell, for every code you write, I'll bet I can find 50 examples of the same
thing elsewhere.
And 40 of them will be copyrighted no less.

[Randy Webb]

Richard wrote:

"Hywel Jenkins" <hy**********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:MP************************@news.individual.ne t...

In article <cs********@news2.newsguy.com>, An*******@127.001 says...

"Mick White" <mw***********@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:JN*********************@twister.nyroc.rr.c om...

Richard wrote:
<--snip-->
When learning, one takes it one step at a time.

You're not learning though, are you, RtS? You're just borrowing code
from others far more talented that you.

Wellll duhhhhh. Don't we all?
"Borrowed" coding appears to be a fairly accepted on the web from what I've
seen so far.
Hell, for every code you write, I'll bet I can find 50 examples of the same
thing elsewhere.
And 40 of them will be copyrighted no less.

Thats easy enough to prove your assumption (which is incorrect).

Search the archives for "dynamically load JS Files" and then find me 50
examples of that code on the web, and 40 of them that are copyrighted.

Either back up your assinine assumptions or STFU
--
Randy
comp.lang.javascript FAQ - http://jibbering.com/faq