contentWindow - portable alternative?

[Jon Drukman]

i'm using the following construct to access form fields within an
iframe:

var x = document.getElementById('prefs_iframe').contentWin dow.document.forms["prefs_form"];

works great in IE and Mozilla/Firefox. doesn't work in Safari. my
DHTML reference book says that contentWindow is only supported in
NN7/IE5.5(Win). what's the DOM-friendly approach to accessing form
fields within an iframe?

the book says to use contentDocument.defaultView but i get [null] when
i try that.

-jsd-

[Richard Cornford]

Jon Drukman wrote:

i'm using the following construct to access form fields within an
iframe:

var x =
document.getElementById('prefs_iframe').contentWin dow.document.forms["pr
efs_form"];
works great in IE and Mozilla/Firefox. doesn't work in Safari. my
DHTML reference book says that contentWindow is only supported in
NN7/IE5.5(Win). what's the DOM-friendly approach to accessing form
fields within an iframe?
The best cross-browser method is to access the IFRAME's global/window
object as a member of the - frames - collection of its containing
window/frame and go into the IFRAME document through its - document -
property. That becomes slightly more cross-browser when you give the
IRAME a name attribute in addition to an ID (They can, and probably
should, be identical):-

frames['prefs_iframe'].document.forms["prefs_form"];
the book says to use contentDocument.defaultView but i
get [null] when i try that.

That really doesn't make much sense as - defaultView - is specified as
an implementation of the - AbstractView - interface, and its -
document - property will refer back to the same object as was referred
to by - contentDocument - (making it a pointless side track).

Richard.

[Jon Drukman]

"Richard Cornford" <Ri*****@litotes.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<cb*******************@news.demon.co.uk>...

The best cross-browser method is to access the IFRAME's global/window
object as a member of the - frames - collection of its containing
window/frame and go into the IFRAME document through its - document -
property. That becomes slightly more cross-browser when you give the
IRAME a name attribute in addition to an ID (They can, and probably
should, be identical):-

frames['prefs_iframe'].document.forms["prefs_form"];

here's what i came up with through my own experimentation:

var x = document.getElementById('prefs_iframe');

if (x.contentWindow) {
x = x.contentWindow.document.forms["prefs_form"];
}
else {
x = x.contentDocument.forms["prefs_form"];
}

works on IE, Moz & Safari. your version seems much more compact
although not very DOM-centric.

-jsd-

[Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn]

Jon Drukman wrote:

"Richard Cornford" <Ri*****@litotes.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<cb*******************@news.demon.co.uk>...

Please do not write attribution novels. The name of the person which
text is quoted is sufficient to follow the discussion. Anything else
can be retrieved via the headers of the postings. Duplicating it
renders discussions less legible.

[...]
frames['prefs_iframe'].document.forms["prefs_form"];

here's what i came up with through my own experimentation:

var x = document.getElementById('prefs_iframe');

if (x.contentWindow) {
x = x.contentWindow.document.forms["prefs_form"];
}
else {
x = x.contentDocument.forms["prefs_form"];
}

works on IE, Moz & Safari. your version seems much more compact
although not very DOM-centric.

Yes, it *seems* to be so. The `frames' collection is part of a
widespread, yet not fully standardized DOM, called "DOM Level 0"
which originates from NN/IE3+ and is still supported in current
browsers (and upon which the W3C DOM is built) while the W3C DOM
is not always fully supported. (Yes, there has been a DOM before
the W3C DOM and there are still other DOMs!, namely the Gecko
DOM). I wonder what you think "DOM-centric" would mean here.
PointedEars

[Dr John Stockton]

JRS: In article <40**************@PointedEars.de>, seen in
news:comp.lang.javascript, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
<Po*********@nurfuerspam.de> posted at Thu, 8 Jul 2004 15:52:21 :

Jon Drukman wrote:

"Richard Cornford" <Ri*****@litotes.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<cbt01g

$9*************@news.demon.co.uk>...

Please do not write attribution novels. The name of the person which
text is quoted is sufficient to follow the discussion. Anything else
can be retrieved via the headers of the postings. Duplicating it
renders discussions less legible.

Ignore him. Current Internet draft standards encourage attribution
details.

The pointed one only wishes to allow that which he himself finds useful.

--
© John Stockton, Surrey, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v4.00 MIME ©
Web <URL:http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/tsfaq.html> -> Timo Salmi: Usenet Q&A.
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/news-use.htm> : about usage of News.
No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News.