> Thanks a lot, Graham, I'm checking that out now. Didn't realize that
it didn't work with IE, I though that 6.0 was supposed to support
it.
I only knew because I was caught out with min-width not so long ago.
I'd definitely recommend getting another browser to give you a second
opinion on your pages as otherwise you may be writing pages that only
work because of IE bugs or only fail because of IE bugs. Not that IE
has a monopoly on bugs.
My thought there was that it would be at 100% unless the visitors
resolution was set higher than 1024x768, at which point it would be
set at 1024. Was this not right?
Yes, but said with a bit of hand waving and a slight gritting of
teeth.
That is to say you do of course have to allow for the actual size of
the browser windows and any borders and scroll bars they may have, and
then consider the web page itself and if you have any margin or
padding on the body element (there may be some by default) and of
course any width, padding or margin on any other element that the
table would be inside. There may also be issues with the size of the
table cells if they are not consistent with the table size which means
something has to give. However yes there should be a point at which
the table width will be set at 1024 and not get any wider.