layers

[Maggie]

can someone explain to me how to fix this behavior.

I have a layer on top of the layer, depending on the browser or the
screen resolution, sometimes the layer underneath is longer then the
one on top and sometimes it's the other way around.

Is there a way to lock them so they wouldn't change the size and look
the same in each situation?

can I fix this using CSS?

Thanks
Maggie

[Lauri Raittila]

In article <18**************************@posting.google.com >, Maggie
wrote:

can someone explain to me how to fix this behavior.

I have a layer on top of the layer,
What do you mean by layer? It is not well defined term.
depending on the browser or the
screen resolution, sometimes the layer underneath is longer then the
one on top and sometimes it's the other way around. Is there a way to lock them so they wouldn't change the size and look
the same in each situation? can I fix this using CSS?

I see no reason to use two "layers" there. Nor can I see use for all
those tables, nor fixed width.

Your code is pretty much unreadable, I think that is because wysinwyg
program. I suggest you start by making it sencible. (problems are endless
empty paragraphs, too many layout tables etc.)
After that, it is quick to make the CSS from scratch, and get rid of pt
and pt units as you go.
--
Lauri Raittila <http://www.iki.fi/lr> <http://www.iki.fi/zwak/fonts>
Saapi lähettää meiliä, jos aihe ei liity ryhmään, tai on yksityinen
tjsp., mutta älä lähetä samaa viestiä meilitse ja ryhmään.

[Tina Holmboe]

Lauri Raittila <la***@raittila.cjb.net> exclaimed in <MP************************@news.cis.dfn.de>:

[quoting Maggie]

I have a layer on top of the layer,

What do you mean by layer? It is not well defined term.

This is yet another of those odd comments I see from time to time. It would
seem to me, in the context of the group ciwas, that "layering" atleast
is very well defined; and that "layer" follows quite clearly.

Can you explain why you mean it is not well defined ?

--
- Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies
ti**@greytower.net http://www.greytower.net/
[+46] 0708 557 905

[Philipp Lenssen]

Tina Holmboe wrote:

Lauri Raittila <la***@raittila.cjb.net> exclaimed in
<MP************************@news.cis.dfn.de>:

[quoting Maggie]

I have a layer on top of the layer,

What do you mean by layer? It is not well defined term.

This is yet another of those odd comments I see from time to time.
It would seem to me, in the context of the group ciwas, that
"layering" atleast is very well defined; and that "layer" follows
quite clearly.

Can you explain why you mean it is not well defined ?

Jumping in the conversation; <layer> was an NetscapeHTML element. So
there might be some confusion there. Container/ div/ absolutely
positioned block-level element etc. can be used also.

--
Google Blogoscoped
http://blog.outer-court.com

[Maggie]

Lauri Raittila <la***@raittila.cjb.net> wrote in message news:<MP************************@news.cis.dfn.de>. ..

In article <18**************************@posting.google.com >, Maggie
wrote:

can someone explain to me how to fix this behavior.

I have a layer on top of the layer,

What do you mean by layer? It is not well defined term.

depending on the browser or the
screen resolution, sometimes the layer underneath is longer then the
one on top and sometimes it's the other way around.

Is there a way to lock them so they wouldn't change the size and look
the same in each situation?

can I fix this using CSS?

I see no reason to use two "layers" there. Nor can I see use for all
those tables, nor fixed width.

Your code is pretty much unreadable, I think that is because wysinwyg
program. I suggest you start by making it sencible. (problems are endless
empty paragraphs, too many layout tables etc.)
After that, it is quick to make the CSS from scratch, and get rid of pt
and pt units as you go.

How can you see my code? I didn't post the URL to my page

[Brian]

Tina Holmboe wrote:

"Philipp Lenssen" <in**@outer-court.com> exclaimed
in <bk***********@id-203055.news.uni-berlin.de>:

Tina Holmboe wrote:

Can you explain why you mean it is not well defined ?

Jumping in the conversation; <layer> was an NetscapeHTML element. So
there might be some confusion there. Container/ div/ absolutely
positioned block-level element etc. can be used also.

Seeing that this is ciwas and that LAYER never existed outside the
dreamworld that was Netscape, I believe we can dispense with that particular
folly.

You and I might dispense with it. (I've never used it; I suspect you
have not either.) But we do get questions here.

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...ng.stylesheets

NB: That link may wrap in your reader.

--
Brian
follow the directions in my address to email me

[Lauri Raittila]

In article <18**************************@posting.google.com >, Maggie
wrote:

Lauri Raittila <la***@raittila.cjb.net> wrote :

In article <18**************************@posting.google.com >, Maggie
wrote:

can someone explain to me how to fix this behavior.

I have a layer on top of the layer,
What do you mean by layer? It is not well defined term.
I propably wrote this bit before I thought I had seen the site. So that's
why I asked what she meaned by layer.

depending on the browser or the
screen resolution, sometimes the layer underneath is longer then the
one on top and sometimes it's the other way around.

Is there a way to lock them so they wouldn't change the size and look
the same in each situation?

can I fix this using CSS?

Propably, but hard to tell whitout actually knowing the problem.
Your code is pretty much unreadable, I think that is because wysinwyg
program. I suggest you start by making it sencible. (problems are endless
empty paragraphs, too many layout tables etc.)
After that, it is quick to make the CSS from scratch, and get rid of pt
and pt units as you go.

To know if my suggestion was incorrect, I would need to see the URL. I
would guess that my advice is pretty good anyway, exept your code is
propably better than the one I thought was yours.
How can you see my code? I didn't post the URL to my page

Hm. That is strange. I still remember how "your" site looked. It had two
layers, of which one was wider than other. Maybe it was some coincidence,
and I replied to wrong post? I sometimes have 10 follow-ups open at time,
so I might have mistaken, especially since both had essentially same
problem.
--
Lauri Raittila <http://www.iki.fi/lr> <http://www.iki.fi/zwak/fonts>
Saapi lähettää meiliä, jos aihe ei liity ryhmään, tai on yksityinen
tjsp., mutta älä lähetä samaa viestiä meilitse ja ryhmään.