I used a validation checker to check on my url's to see if it is o.k.
and it isxhmtl compliant and it found some errors, which I do not know
how to fix.
I used a validation checker to check on my url's to see if it is o.k. and it isxhmtl compliant and it found some errors, which I do not know how to fix.
I would like some help please.
The last person to use the group's Crystal Ball has done a runner with
it, so you'll have to provide us with an url.
The last person to use the group's Crystal Ball has done a runner with it
Yeah, I've meaning to speak to Neal about that. Thing is, I was hoping
to find out who'll win the U.S. presidential elections in November, and
a gaze into the Ball might be just the ticket. If you'll pardon the pun.
I used a validation checker to check on my url's to see if it is o.k. and it isxhmtl compliant and it found some errors, which I do not know how to fix.
I would like some help please.
Morgon the Magnificent, who sees all and tells all, divines from the
tea leaves that you have TDs that aren't nested inside TRs.
--
Harlan Messinger
Remove the first dot from my e-mail address.
Veuillez ôter le premier point de mon adresse de courriel.
th*******@vzavenue.net (amy) wrote in
news:79**************************@posting.google.c om:
Hi,
I used a validation checker to check on my url's to see if it is o.k. and it isxhmtl compliant and it found some errors, which I do not know how to fix.
I would like some help please.
Well, a good first step would be to tell people what
website you are talking about.
Gazing into the crystal ball(I just borrowed it briefly)
perhaps you mean http://www.poemstogo.tv/ ?
I used a validation checker to check on my url's to see if it is o.k. and it isxhmtl compliant and it found some errors, which I do not know how to fix.
Forget XHTML and use HTML 4.01 until you understand what XHTML is about
_and_ browsers (_at least_ the most commonly used browser) start actually
supporting XHTML.
Use nice references like http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/ to get
your HTML right. (That reference presents HTML 4.0, but you will hardly
notice the difference. In case of doubt, consult the authorative though
partly obscure and sloppy specification, http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/ )
