Is the website ok?

[Ganesh J. Acharya]

Shree Ganesha

Dear Readers

I am a new commer to this forum

Please tell me wether this website http://ashapurafoods.com is done in
a proper format..

Best Regards

Webmaster
Ganesh J. Acharya
--
seashellwebs.com
ashapurafoods.com

[Andreas Prilop]

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Alan J. Flavell wrote:

The ultimate in HTML compatibility: "works" only on broken browsers.

<http://www.netzero.net/support/info/net60-users.html>
©2004 NetZero, Inc.

--
Top-posting.
What's the most irritating thing on Usenet?

[Neal]

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 15:06:50 +0200, Andreas Prilop
<nh******@rrzn-user.uni-hannover.de> wrote:

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Alan J. Flavell wrote:

The ultimate in HTML compatibility: "works" only on broken browsers.

<http://www.netzero.net/support/info/net60-users.html>
©2004 NetZero, Inc.

Oh, that is entirely bullshit. I've always hated NetZero, now I have a new
reason... the name is rather apt, isn't it? ;}

[Uncle Pirate]

Neal wrote:

Oh, that is entirely bullshit. I've always hated NetZero, now I have a
new reason... the name is rather apt, isn't it? ;}

If you're referring to the blank page (zero content) that I saw at the
link, yep, very apt.

--
Stan McCann "Uncle Pirate"
Webmaster/Computer Center Manager, NMSU at Alamogordo
Cooordinator, Tularosa Basin Chapter, ABATE of NM AMA#758681
'94 1500 Vulcan (now wrecked) :( http://surecann.com/Dcp_2068c.jpg
A zest for living must include a willingness to die. - R.A. Heinlein

[kchayka]

Uncle Pirate wrote:

Neal wrote:

Oh, that is entirely bullshit. I've always hated NetZero, now I have a
new reason... the name is rather apt, isn't it? ;}

If you're referring to the blank page (zero content) that I saw at the
link, yep, very apt.

Try it with JS disabled. ;)

--
Reply email address is a bottomless spam bucket.
Please reply to the group so everyone can share.

[Uncle Pirate]

kchayka wrote:

Try it with JS disabled. ;)

I thought that's why it was blank.

No javascript, java, plugins, cookies, or popups. I don't browse that
way; I don't code that way. I keep the most insecure browser available
for when I must visit sites that require that crap. Only two on my
list: Ameritrade and Ebay. I run Ad-Aware and Spybot after those visits.

--
Stan McCann "Uncle Pirate"
Webmaster/Computer Center Manager, NMSU at Alamogordo
Cooordinator, Tularosa Basin Chapter, ABATE of NM AMA#758681
'94 1500 Vulcan (now wrecked) :( http://surecann.com/Dcp_2068c.jpg
A zest for living must include a willingness to die. - R.A. Heinlein

[Alan J. Flavell]

On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Uncle Pirate wrote:

kchayka wrote:
it's about http://www.netzero.net/support/info/net60-users.html

Try it with JS disabled. ;)

I thought that's why it was blank.

Oh no, it was much more fun with JS enabled! While displaying a blank
window, it was furiously fetching -something- from their web site,
over and over and over again. I wondered whether to leave the office
browser doing that all night - after all, it's not my fault - they
evidently designed this behaviour into their web site, whether through
intent or incompetence is not my problem: anyhow, I switched to
another window for doing useful work, and when I went back later it
was still beavering away with trying to fetch stuff from their web
site, without managing to display anything; I lost patience and put it
out of its misery.

But I've just tried it again from the dial-up (using Mozilla, natch)
and it's noodling away again. This web page is "Unsafe at any speed"
(if you know what I mean).
No javascript, java, plugins, cookies, or popups. I don't browse that
way; I don't code that way.

Good for you!

[Uncle Pirate]

Alan J. Flavell wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Uncle Pirate wrote:

kchayka wrote:

it's about http://www.netzero.net/support/info/net60-users.html

Try it with JS disabled. ;)

I thought that's why it was blank.

Oh no, it was much more fun with JS enabled! While displaying a blank
window, it was furiously fetching -something- from their web site,

I noted that too with js disabled. I just didn't stick around long.

No javascript, java, plugins, cookies, or popups. I don't browse that
way; I don't code that way.

Good for you!

Thanks. I just figure I don't like all that stuff, why inflict it on
others?

--
Stan McCann "Uncle Pirate"
Webmaster/Computer Center Manager, NMSU at Alamogordo
Cooordinator, Tularosa Basin Chapter, ABATE of NM AMA#758681
'94 1500 Vulcan (now wrecked) :( http://surecann.com/Dcp_2068c.jpg
A zest for living must include a willingness to die. - R.A. Heinlein

[Brian]

Uncle Pirate wrote:

No javascript, java, plugins, cookies, or popups. I don't
browse that way; I don't code that way.

I just figure I don't like all that stuff, why inflict it on
others?

It seems so obvious, doesn't it? And yet, a short time out on the
www suggests that very few authors seem to have grasped it.

--
Brian (remove ".invalid" to email me)
http://www.tsmchughs.com/

[Brian]

Alan J. Flavell wrote:

On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Uncle Pirate wrote:

kchayka wrote:

http://www.netzero.net/support/info/net60-users.html

Try it with JS disabled. ;)

I thought that's why it was blank.

Oh no, it was much more fun with JS enabled! While displaying a
blank window, it was furiously fetching -something- from their web
site, over and over and over again.

Perhaps someone from Net0 reads ciwa*? I just checked with Firefox,
with js enabled and disabled, and got a page in both cases.

--
Brian (remove ".invalid" to email me)
http://www.tsmchughs.com/

[Alan J. Flavell]

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004, Brian wrote:

Perhaps someone from Net0 reads ciwa*? I just checked with Firefox,
with js enabled and disabled, and got a page in both cases.

Well, I just revisited from Moz 1.6, and also got the page displayed -
but then I remembered having disabled JS. Reloading with JS enabled -
and it's noodling away indefinitely with a blank display, happily
trying to reload something, just like the behaviour I had seen
previously. Of course, cookies are disabled - that might be a factor
which they hadn't bargained for? But I'm only guessing - because I
really don't think it's my job to debug their page for them.

cheers

[Andreas Prilop]

On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Alan J. Flavell wrote:

Oh yes, I think I just found the very page.

For example with Google:
<http://www.google.com/search?ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22%D62+times%22>

...and the escape velocity is
<font face="Symbol">&Ouml;</font><i>2</i>
times the orbital velocity.

Dr Stockton still hasn't told us which of his favourite browsers
*cannot* display the correct square root sign, as in
<http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/temp/squareroot.html>

--
Top-posting.
What's the most irritating thing on Usenet?