By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
437,738 Members | 1,080 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 437,738 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

Why isn't "this type of URI scheme ... supported"?

P: n/a
w3c.org recommends I ask this group, so here you go:

I'm trying to validate a page I have at:
http://members.cruzio.com/~webcab9/svft/contract.html but the w3c valiadator
said "this type of URI scheme (undefined) is not supported by this
service..." Why not? I know I've validated pages in the past at
members.cruzio.com/~webcab/ ...

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Ted :-)
Jul 20 '05 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
2 Replies


P: n/a
* Ted Altenberg wrote in comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html:
I'm trying to validate a page I have at:
http://members.cruzio.com/~webcab9/svft/contract.html but the w3c valiadator
said "this type of URI scheme (undefined) is not supported by this
service..." Why not? I know I've validated pages in the past at
members.cruzio.com/~webcab/ ...


I guess you forgot the mandatory leading "http://", try

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=ht.../contract.html
Jul 20 '05 #2

P: n/a
On Wed, 5 May 2004 05:08:34 -0700, "Ted Altenberg"
<ta********@cruzio.com> wrote:
w3c.org recommends I ask this group, so here you go:

I'm trying to validate a page I have at:
http://members.cruzio.com/~webcab9/svft/contract.html but the w3c valiadator
said "this type of URI scheme (undefined) is not supported by this
service..." Why not? I know I've validated pages in the past at
members.cruzio.com/~webcab/ ...

Went through the validator just fine for me, although it doesn't
validate as HTML 4.10 Transitional. There are several errors you need
to fix.

Are you getting the "this type of URI scheme..." error when trying to
validate a file on your hard drive and using the online validator? Or
vice versa?

Leslie

"I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person."
Jul 20 '05 #3

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.