By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
455,240 Members | 1,404 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 455,240 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

need help with displaying 2 web pages on single window

P: n/a
jt
I would like to combine two web pages to make it look like one. One
page is above the other. When I use frames, the bottom part requires
user to scroll, but there's very little room left to scroll (the top
page takes most of the window space). I would consider using frames
if it allows the vertical scroll for the whole window.

thanks,
jptu
Jul 20 '05 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
8 Replies


P: n/a
jt schrieb:
I would like to combine two web pages to make it look like one. One
page is above the other. When I use frames, the bottom part requires
user to scroll, but there's very little room left to scroll (the top
page takes most of the window space). I would consider using frames
if it allows the vertical scroll for the whole window.


Try the <IFRAME>-Tag!

GS

Jul 20 '05 #2

P: n/a
jt schrieb:
I would like to combine two web pages to make it look like one. One
page is above the other. When I use frames, the bottom part requires
user to scroll, but there's very little room left to scroll (the top
page takes most of the window space). I would consider using frames
if it allows the vertical scroll for the whole window.


Try the <IFRAME>-Tag!

GS

Jul 20 '05 #3

P: n/a
jt <ju**********@yahoo.com> wrote:
I would like to combine two web pages to make it look like one. One
page is above the other. When I use frames, the bottom part requires
user to scroll, but there's very little room left to scroll (the top
page takes most of the window space). I would consider using frames
if it allows the vertical scroll for the whole window.


See http://www.htmlhelp.com/faq/html/des...l#include-file
--
Darin McGrew, mc****@stanfordalumni.org, http://www.rahul.net/mcgrew/
Web Design Group, da***@htmlhelp.com, http://www.HTMLHelp.com/

"If you aren't part of the solution, then you are part of the precipitate."
Jul 20 '05 #4

P: n/a
jt <ju**********@yahoo.com> wrote:
I would like to combine two web pages to make it look like one. One
page is above the other. When I use frames, the bottom part requires
user to scroll, but there's very little room left to scroll (the top
page takes most of the window space). I would consider using frames
if it allows the vertical scroll for the whole window.


See http://www.htmlhelp.com/faq/html/des...l#include-file
--
Darin McGrew, mc****@stanfordalumni.org, http://www.rahul.net/mcgrew/
Web Design Group, da***@htmlhelp.com, http://www.HTMLHelp.com/

"If you aren't part of the solution, then you are part of the precipitate."
Jul 20 '05 #5

P: n/a

"Gerd Schmitzer" <ge*************@gmx.com> wrote in message
news:c5************@ID-40217.news.uni-berlin.de...
jt schrieb:
I would like to combine two web pages to make it look like one. One
page is above the other. When I use frames, the bottom part requires
user to scroll, but there's very little room left to scroll (the top
page takes most of the window space). I would consider using frames
if it allows the vertical scroll for the whole window.


Try the <IFRAME>-Tag!


Unless one plans to remain 4.01 Transitional forever, is it really a good
idea to start using a feature that one hasn't used before and that isn't in
HTML Strict and therefore (I assume) won't be in future HTML versions?

Jul 20 '05 #6

P: n/a

"Gerd Schmitzer" <ge*************@gmx.com> wrote in message
news:c5************@ID-40217.news.uni-berlin.de...
jt schrieb:
I would like to combine two web pages to make it look like one. One
page is above the other. When I use frames, the bottom part requires
user to scroll, but there's very little room left to scroll (the top
page takes most of the window space). I would consider using frames
if it allows the vertical scroll for the whole window.


Try the <IFRAME>-Tag!


Unless one plans to remain 4.01 Transitional forever, is it really a good
idea to start using a feature that one hasn't used before and that isn't in
HTML Strict and therefore (I assume) won't be in future HTML versions?

Jul 20 '05 #7

P: n/a
Harlan Messinger wrote:
"Gerd Schmitzer" <ge*************@gmx.com> wrote in message
news:c5************@ID-40217.news.uni-berlin.de...

[snip]
Try the <IFRAME>-Tag!


Unless one plans to remain 4.01 Transitional forever, is it really a
good idea to start using a feature that one hasn't used before and
that isn't in HTML Strict and therefore (I assume) won't be in future
HTML versions?


I'm not advocating IFRAME, (although I experimented with it and it had its
uses), but it has a very curious status.

It is in the "loose" DTD, but it isn't (apparently) deprecated. It is the only
such element in this list.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/index/elements.html

I'm not sure what they means. (I don't mean just on the surface - what is the
basis for that status?)

--
Barry Pearson
http://www.Barry.Pearson.name/photography/
http://www.BirdsAndAnimals.info/
http://www.ChildSupportAnalysis.co.uk/
Jul 20 '05 #8

P: n/a
Harlan Messinger wrote:
"Gerd Schmitzer" <ge*************@gmx.com> wrote in message
news:c5************@ID-40217.news.uni-berlin.de...

[snip]
Try the <IFRAME>-Tag!


Unless one plans to remain 4.01 Transitional forever, is it really a
good idea to start using a feature that one hasn't used before and
that isn't in HTML Strict and therefore (I assume) won't be in future
HTML versions?


I'm not advocating IFRAME, (although I experimented with it and it had its
uses), but it has a very curious status.

It is in the "loose" DTD, but it isn't (apparently) deprecated. It is the only
such element in this list.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/index/elements.html

I'm not sure what they means. (I don't mean just on the surface - what is the
basis for that status?)

--
Barry Pearson
http://www.Barry.Pearson.name/photography/
http://www.BirdsAndAnimals.info/
http://www.ChildSupportAnalysis.co.uk/
Jul 20 '05 #9

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.