need help with displaying 2 web pages on single window

[jt]

I would like to combine two web pages to make it look like one. One
page is above the other. When I use frames, the bottom part requires
user to scroll, but there's very little room left to scroll (the top
page takes most of the window space). I would consider using frames
if it allows the vertical scroll for the whole window.

thanks,
jptu

[Gerd Schmitzer]

jt schrieb:

I would like to combine two web pages to make it look like one. One
page is above the other. When I use frames, the bottom part requires
user to scroll, but there's very little room left to scroll (the top
page takes most of the window space). I would consider using frames
if it allows the vertical scroll for the whole window.

Try the <IFRAME>-Tag!

GS

[Gerd Schmitzer]

jt schrieb:

I would like to combine two web pages to make it look like one. One
page is above the other. When I use frames, the bottom part requires
user to scroll, but there's very little room left to scroll (the top
page takes most of the window space). I would consider using frames
if it allows the vertical scroll for the whole window.

Try the <IFRAME>-Tag!

GS

[Darin McGrew]

jt <ju**********@yahoo.com> wrote:

I would like to combine two web pages to make it look like one. One
page is above the other. When I use frames, the bottom part requires
user to scroll, but there's very little room left to scroll (the top
page takes most of the window space). I would consider using frames
if it allows the vertical scroll for the whole window.

See http://www.htmlhelp.com/faq/html/des...l#include-file
--
Darin McGrew, mc****@stanfordalumni.org, http://www.rahul.net/mcgrew/
Web Design Group, da***@htmlhelp.com, http://www.HTMLHelp.com/

"If you aren't part of the solution, then you are part of the precipitate."

[Darin McGrew]

jt <ju**********@yahoo.com> wrote:

I would like to combine two web pages to make it look like one. One
page is above the other. When I use frames, the bottom part requires
user to scroll, but there's very little room left to scroll (the top
page takes most of the window space). I would consider using frames
if it allows the vertical scroll for the whole window.

See http://www.htmlhelp.com/faq/html/des...l#include-file
--
Darin McGrew, mc****@stanfordalumni.org, http://www.rahul.net/mcgrew/
Web Design Group, da***@htmlhelp.com, http://www.HTMLHelp.com/

"If you aren't part of the solution, then you are part of the precipitate."

[Harlan Messinger]

"Gerd Schmitzer" <ge*************@gmx.com> wrote in message
news:c5************@ID-40217.news.uni-berlin.de...

jt schrieb:

I would like to combine two web pages to make it look like one. One
page is above the other. When I use frames, the bottom part requires
user to scroll, but there's very little room left to scroll (the top
page takes most of the window space). I would consider using frames
if it allows the vertical scroll for the whole window.

Try the <IFRAME>-Tag!

Unless one plans to remain 4.01 Transitional forever, is it really a good
idea to start using a feature that one hasn't used before and that isn't in
HTML Strict and therefore (I assume) won't be in future HTML versions?

[Harlan Messinger]

"Gerd Schmitzer" <ge*************@gmx.com> wrote in message
news:c5************@ID-40217.news.uni-berlin.de...

jt schrieb:

I would like to combine two web pages to make it look like one. One
page is above the other. When I use frames, the bottom part requires
user to scroll, but there's very little room left to scroll (the top
page takes most of the window space). I would consider using frames
if it allows the vertical scroll for the whole window.

Try the <IFRAME>-Tag!

Unless one plans to remain 4.01 Transitional forever, is it really a good
idea to start using a feature that one hasn't used before and that isn't in
HTML Strict and therefore (I assume) won't be in future HTML versions?

[Barry Pearson]

Harlan Messinger wrote:

"Gerd Schmitzer" <ge*************@gmx.com> wrote in message
news:c5************@ID-40217.news.uni-berlin.de...

[snip]

Try the <IFRAME>-Tag!

Unless one plans to remain 4.01 Transitional forever, is it really a
good idea to start using a feature that one hasn't used before and
that isn't in HTML Strict and therefore (I assume) won't be in future
HTML versions?

I'm not advocating IFRAME, (although I experimented with it and it had its
uses), but it has a very curious status.

It is in the "loose" DTD, but it isn't (apparently) deprecated. It is the only
such element in this list.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/index/elements.html

I'm not sure what they means. (I don't mean just on the surface - what is the
basis for that status?)

--
Barry Pearson
http://www.Barry.Pearson.name/photography/
http://www.BirdsAndAnimals.info/
http://www.ChildSupportAnalysis.co.uk/

[Barry Pearson]

Harlan Messinger wrote:

"Gerd Schmitzer" <ge*************@gmx.com> wrote in message
news:c5************@ID-40217.news.uni-berlin.de...

[snip]

Try the <IFRAME>-Tag!

Unless one plans to remain 4.01 Transitional forever, is it really a
good idea to start using a feature that one hasn't used before and
that isn't in HTML Strict and therefore (I assume) won't be in future
HTML versions?

I'm not advocating IFRAME, (although I experimented with it and it had its
uses), but it has a very curious status.

It is in the "loose" DTD, but it isn't (apparently) deprecated. It is the only
such element in this list.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/index/elements.html

I'm not sure what they means. (I don't mean just on the surface - what is the
basis for that status?)

--
Barry Pearson
http://www.Barry.Pearson.name/photography/
http://www.BirdsAndAnimals.info/
http://www.ChildSupportAnalysis.co.uk/