Hi,
rf wrote:
"Peter Connolly" <no*************@nospamrequired.com> wrote in message
news:bk*******************@news.demon.co.uk...
The status bar is there for the user to see which URL a link points to,
not
for you to manipulate. Leave it all alone and all will be OK :-)
The status bar is there to show status messages. If your application has a
more useful status message than a (not very useful) URL, then why not
program the status bar to show a useful message?
IMHO the status bar is there to show status messages *from the browser*, not
from the web page author. A web page is not the application, the browser is
the application. The web page is the data.
This has been thrashed about endlessly in the newsgroups. The general
consensus is that, when viewers hover over a link they sometimes look at the
status bar to see where the link is going to send them to. If something
other than a URL appears then they get suspicious and just don't go there.
The exception is of course those XXX sites :-)
Cheers
Richard.
While I understand that the general consensus amongst webdesigner is
what you state, I disagree in some cases.
The status bar is there to give information. Actually, the browser is
more than an application, it's a platform. Nowadays, full-blown
applications can be implemented in JavaScript, and the status bar can be
very handy, for example to inform the user about the progress of a long
process. It's easy to use, and you should not let your user sit and wait
without any information.
I agree that for links, the status bar should preferably display the
URL. But the status bar can be used for a lot more than just that.
Laurent
--
Laurent Bugnion, GalaSoft
Webdesign, Java, javascript
:
http://www.galasoft-LB.ch
Private/Malaysia:
http://mypage.bluewin.ch/lbugnion
Support children in Calcutta:
http://www.calcutta-espoir.ch