423,103 Members | 1,428 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 423,103 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

How to hide source code

P: n/a


Apparently there is now a way to hide html source code. How it done?
For example see:

See http://www.eteamz.com/banksblaze/
Jul 20 '05 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
13 Replies


P: n/a
Its there --right click -- just scroll down far enough.

James Pickering
http://www.jp29.org/
Jul 20 '05 #2

P: n/a
Here is a NO RIGHT CLICK code:

<SCRIPT language=JavaScript> <!--
// No rightclick script v.2.5
// (c) 1998 barts1000
// ba*******@aol.com
// Don't delete this header!

var message="Sorry, that function is disabled.\n\nContents Copyright
©Online Options 1998-2000."; // Message for the alert box

// Don't edit below!

function click(e) {
if (document.all) {
if (event.button == 2) {
alert(message);
return false;
}
}
if (document.layers) {
if (e.which == 3) {
alert(message);
return false;
}
}
}
if (document.layers) {
document.captureEvents(Event.MOUSEDOWN);
}
document.onmousedown=click;
// --> </SCRIPT>
Mike wrote:
Apparently there is now a way to hide html source code. How it done?
For example see:

See http://www.eteamz.com/banksblaze/


Jul 20 '05 #3

P: n/a
Warren wrote:
Here is a NO RIGHT CLICK code:

[code snipped]
which might frustrate legitimate uses (e.g., bookmarking the site, not
something one normally wants to discourage), but which has no chance
of preventing me from right clicking and getting the context menu.

--
Brian
follow the directions in my address to email me

Jul 20 '05 #4

P: n/a
Warren wa****@NOSPAM-digorig.com wrote:
Here is a NO RIGHT CLICK code:


But why bother with that? There are are several ways to observe the source code
with the "NO RIGHT CLICK" code included.

One way is to simply run the page through an HTML Validator with the "view
source" feature activated.

James Pickering
http://www.jp29.org/
Jul 20 '05 #5

P: n/a
Mike wrote:
Apparently there is now a way to hide html source code.
No there isn't.
How it done?
< http://www.vortex-webdesign.com/help/hidesource.htm >
For example see < http://www.eteamz.com/banksblaze/ >


<html>
<head>

<title>Banks Blaze 14u</title>

etc.

--
Brian
follow the directions in my address to email me

Jul 20 '05 #6

P: n/a
mi**@nospam.com (Mike) wrote:
Apparently there is now a way to hide html source code. How it done?


To hide your source, generate it with MS Office (Word or PowerPoint).
Nobody will be able to read it.
Jul 20 '05 #7

P: n/a
Brian wrote:
Mike wrote:
Apparently there is now a way to hide html source code.


No there isn't.


yes there is...same as it ever was...don't upload it to a
web server

--
eric
www.ericjarvis.co.uk
"Hey Lord don't ask me questions
There ain't no answer in me"
Jul 20 '05 #8

P: n/a

"Mike" <mi**@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:3f***************@news.webperception.com...


Apparently there is now a way to hide html source code. How it done?
For example see:

See http://www.eteamz.com/banksblaze/


You mean this source?
http://www.murderthestupid.com/banksblaze.txt

"How Do I Keep People From Stealing My Stuff?"
http://karlcore.com/articles/article.php?id=18
--
Karl Core

Charles Sweeney says my sig is fine as it is.

Jul 20 '05 #9

P: n/a

"Warren" <wa****@NOSPAM-digorig.com> wrote in message
news:3F**************@NOSPAM-digorig.com...
Here is a NO RIGHT CLICK code:


<snip tripe>

Great idea. Let's fuck with people's hardware...
--
Karl Core

Charles Sweeney says my sig is fine as it is.

Jul 20 '05 #10

P: n/a
In article <3f***************@news.webperception.com> in
comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html, Mike <mi**@nospam.com> wrote:
Apparently there is now a way to hide html source code. How it done?
For example see: See http://www.eteamz.com/banksblaze/


If this is a serious query, you are being fooled by an inferior
browser. I am able to see the source code just fine in Mozilla by
selecting "View source".

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Cortland County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Jul 20 '05 #11

P: n/a
In article <20***************************@mb-m19.aol.com> in
comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html, JAMESICUS <ja*******@aol.com>
wrote:
Warren wa****@NOSPAM-digorig.com wrote:
Here is a NO RIGHT CLICK code:


But why bother with that? There are are several ways to observe the source code
with the "NO RIGHT CLICK" code included.

One way is to simply run the page through an HTML Validator with the "view
source" feature activated.


Having been the original namer of Flavell's Law, I now venture to
propound Brown's Corollary: Any source that an author _tries_ to
hide isn't worth viewing.

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Cortland County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Jul 20 '05 #12

P: n/a
In article <hF***************@fe01.atl2.webusenet.com> in
comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html, Keith Bowes <do****@spam.me>
wrote:
As others have mentioned, the source code is there after a bunch of
useless blank lines. But I do see why they wouldn't want a knowledgable
person to see that horrendous attempt at HTML.


Embarrassment? :-)

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Cortland County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Jul 20 '05 #13

P: n/a
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 20:22:27 -0400, Stan Brown
<th************@fastmail.fm> wrote:
In article <20***************************@mb-m19.aol.com> in
comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html, JAMESICUS <ja*******@aol.com>
wrote:
Warren wa****@NOSPAM-digorig.com wrote:
Here is a NO RIGHT CLICK code:
But why bother with that? There are are several ways to observe the source code
with the "NO RIGHT CLICK" code included.

One way is to simply run the page through an HTML Validator with the "view
source" feature activated.

Having been the original namer of Flavell's Law, I now venture to
propound Brown's Corollary: Any source that an author _tries_ to
hide isn't worth viewing.

I've been thinking for a while that that phenomenon deserves a name! It
seems to have even fewer counter-examples than Flavell's Law - i.e. I
have yet to see one. As however it is somewhat independent from
Flavell's Law, I think we could call it Brown's Law.

--
Stephen Poley

http://www.xs4all.nl/~sbpoley/webmatters/
Jul 20 '05 #14

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.