Validation

[Jean Pierre Daviau]

Ho to everyone,
======== http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=' ===========

I would like to rewrite this script to validate files from my desktop.

Thanks for your attention.

------
<SCRIPT type="text/javascript"document.write(' <a
href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=' + document.URL + '">valid XHTML
1.1</a>');</SCRIPT>
-------
--
Jean Pierre Daviau

--
windows XP professionnel 2002 SP2
asus p4 s533/333/133

http://jeanpierredaviau.com

Aimons les étrangers; l'on vit avec eux les trois quart de notre vie.

[Stevo]

Jean Pierre Daviau wrote:

Ho to everyone,

Ho to you too :)

======== http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=' ===========
I would like to rewrite this script to validate files from my desktop.

That's nice for you. Hope it's a fun and useful project.

Thanks for your attention.

You're welcome.

[Jukka K. Korpela]

Scripsit Jean Pierre Daviau:

I would like to rewrite this script to validate files from my desktop.

That has nothing to do with stylesheets.

<SCRIPT type="text/javascript"document.write(' <a
href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=' + document.URL + '">valid
XHTML 1.1</a>');</SCRIPT>
-------

Huh? Using JavaScript to generate a simple link is odd, and it is even
odder to do so using non-XHTML syntax for the <scriptelement and
document.write().

Besides, the W3C Markup Validator already has a "validate by file
upload" feature.

But this has nothing to do with stylesheets.

--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

[Safalra (Stephen Morley)]

On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 07:48:15 -0400, Jean Pierre Daviau wrote:

======== http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=' ===========

I would like to rewrite this script to validate files from my desktop.

Thanks for your attention.

------
<SCRIPT type="text/javascript"document.write(' <a
href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=' + document.URL + '">valid XHTML
1.1</a>');</SCRIPT>

If you want to have a link to validate a file even when it's offline you'd
have to use some clever JavaScript to make a POST request in the same way
the validator's 'direct input' form does. What's wrong with just uploading
the file? Or using a browser extension that tells you whether the page
you're currently viewing is valid?
--
Safalra (Stephen Morley)

The 'white-space' Property In CSS:
http://www.safalra.com/web-design/ht...pace-property/

[Jean Pierre Daviau]

That has nothing to do with stylesheets.

><SCRIPT type="text/javascript"document.write(' <a
href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=' + document.URL + '">valid
XHTML 1.1</a>');</SCRIPT>
-------

<p><SCRIPT type="text/javascript"document.write('<A
HREF="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=' + document.URL +
'">CSS validation</a>');</SCRIPT></p>

This is to automatically input a address for validation in my web pages I
create with ... notepad....
Test it here:
http://privee.jeanpierredaviau.com/xhtm.html
I would like to rewrite this script to validate files uploaded from my
desktop. Something like:

HREF="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator#validate_by_upload?file=C:\

I will try on a javascript group.

Thanks for your attention.

[Bergamot]

Jean Pierre Daviau wrote:

>
<p><SCRIPT type="text/javascript"document.write('<A
HREF="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=' + document.URL +
'">CSS validation</a>');</SCRIPT></p>

This is to automatically input a address for validation in my web pages

You don't need JavaScript at all. Look up the 'referer' option, i.e.
http://validator.w3.org/check/referer

--
Berg

[Rik Wasmus]

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:35:03 +0200, Bergamot <be******@visi.comwrote:

>
Jean Pierre Daviau wrote:

>>
<p><SCRIPT type="text/javascript"document.write('<A
HREF="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=' + document.URL
+
'">CSS validation</a>');</SCRIPT></p>

This is to automatically input a address for validation in my web pages

You don't need JavaScript at all. Look up the 'referer' option, i.e.
http://validator.w3.org/check/referer

Hmmm, 'referer' headers are often not send in my experience (either by UA
setting or possible paranoid firewalls / proxies)
--
Rik Wasmus
....spamrun finished

[Bergamot]

Rik Wasmus wrote:

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:35:03 +0200, Bergamot <be******@visi.comwrote:

>>
http://validator.w3.org/check/referer

Hmmm, 'referer' headers are often not send in my experience (either by UA
setting or possible paranoid firewalls / proxies)

Well, considering links to the validator are pretty useless anyway, does
it really matter?

There are other ways to validate single pages without it, such as with
the Web Developer Toolbar extension. That's something any interested
party, not just the author, can use.

--
Berg

[Rik Wasmus]

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:42:50 +0200, Bergamot <be******@visi.comwrote:

Rik Wasmus wrote:

>On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:35:03 +0200, Bergamot <be******@visi.comwrote:

>>>
http://validator.w3.org/check/referer

Hmmm, 'referer' headers are often not send in my experience (either by
UA
setting or possible paranoid firewalls / proxies)

Well, considering links to the validator are pretty useless anyway, does
it really matter?

There are other ways to validate single pages without it, such as with
the Web Developer Toolbar extension. That's something any interested
party, not just the author, can use.

I'd say so. The general public doesn't care one lick, and the people who
do know how to check it. Don't supply a possibly failing link then. None
would be best :).
--
Rik Wasmus
....spamrun finished