473,320 Members | 1,982 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,320 software developers and data experts.

Preventing a Website from Being Copied

Hello,

I'm in the process of putting up a website -- my first. There's a
number of tools (like WinHTTrack) that allow an entire site to be
copied to someone's hard drive to be examined at their leisure. Does
anyone know of a method to prevent tools like this from working? I
want people to visit my site, but I also want the stuff that's under
the hood to stay under the hood.

My thanks for all helpful answers.
Jun 27 '08 #1
21 2698
whitesmith wrote:
Hello,

I'm in the process of putting up a website -- my first. There's a
number of tools (like WinHTTrack) that allow an entire site to be
copied to someone's hard drive to be examined at their leisure. Does
anyone know of a method to prevent tools like this from working? I
want people to visit my site, but I also want the stuff that's under
the hood to stay under the hood.

My thanks for all helpful answers.
Can't be done. If people want to save your content, they can and will.
Keep your content fresh, and people will keep coming back.
Jun 27 '08 #2
whitesmith <ap*******@hushmail.comwrites:
Hello,

I'm in the process of putting up a website -- my first. There's a
number of tools (like WinHTTrack) that allow an entire site to be
copied to someone's hard drive to be examined at their leisure. Does
anyone know of a method to prevent tools like this from working?
This is inherently impossible for a public website.
I want people to visit my site, but I also want the stuff that's under
the hood to stay under the hood.
You may be seriously overestimating the amount of interest people will
have in your javascript/html/css. Especially if it's your first.

Don't worry about it.
My thanks for all helpful answers.
Cheers,

Joost.

--
Joost Diepenmaat | blog: http://joost.zeekat.nl/ | work: http://zeekat.nl/
Jun 27 '08 #3
On 6/10/2008 11:34 AM, whitesmith wrote:
Hello,

I'm in the process of putting up a website -- my first. There's a
number of tools (like WinHTTrack) that allow an entire site to be
copied to someone's hard drive to be examined at their leisure. Does
anyone know of a method to prevent tools like this from working? I
want people to visit my site, but I also want the stuff that's under
the hood to stay under the hood.

My thanks for all helpful answers.
If you are in the U.S. or certain other nations, put a copyright notice
on each page. In the U.S., there is an implied copyright; but an
explicit notice is better.

You must then exert the effort to locate violations of your copyright
and enforce it. This is generally done only for commercial use of your
work since there is a right of fair use for limited non-commercial use.

See my <http://www.rossde.com/copyright.html>.

--
David Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>

Have you been using Netscape and now feel abandoned by AOL?
Then use SeaMonkey. Go to <http://www.seamonkey-project.org/>.
Jun 27 '08 #4
Scripsit David E. Ross:
If you are in the U.S. or certain other nations, put a copyright
notice on each page. In the U.S., there is an implied copyright; but
an explicit notice is better.
An explicit notice adds nothing to copyright. In copyrightially
underdeveloped countries, _registration_ of copyright, at the applicable
office, may yield some additional rights in actions against offences.
You must then exert the effort to locate violations of your copyright
and enforce it.
If you like, you can try to do such things.
This is generally done only for commercial use of
your work since there is a right of fair use for limited
non-commercial use.
"Fair use" depends on culture, legislation, and interpretation. Even the
phrase "fair use" is basically an Americanism; in the EU, for example,
limitations to copyright are, in principle at least, based on specific
clauses in legislation.

Typically, when people ask, more or less clueslessly, how to protect
their web site from being copied, they actually mean the _design_ of the
site. In such situations, it is quite probable that the design isn't
protected by copyright (i.e. is not a "work" in the copyright sense),
and quite certain that it's not worth copying, though this does not
always prevent it from being copied.

Of course, this has nothing to do with HTML, but neither has the
original question. The whole thread is clearly off-topic, so we can let
it die, or we could continue this little chat.

Spectators need to be warned that there are probably only two people in
the world who really know and understand copyright in the worldwide
context, neither of them is participating this discussion, and they
disagree on pretty much everything.

--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

Jun 27 '08 #5
On 11 Jun, 09:33, "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorp...@cs.tut.fiwrote:
Spectators need to be warned that there are probably only two people in
the world who really know and understand copyright in the worldwide
context, neither of them is participating this discussion, and they
disagree on pretty much everything.
Who might they be, and have they published anything readable?

(Lessig?)
Jun 27 '08 #6
In article
<41**********************************@c58g2000hsc. googlegroups.com>,
Andy Dingley <di*****@codesmiths.comwrote:
On 11 Jun, 09:33, "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorp...@cs.tut.fiwrote:
Spectators need to be warned that there are probably only two people in
the world who really know and understand copyright in the worldwide
context, neither of them is participating this discussion, and they
disagree on pretty much everything.

Who might they be, and have they published anything readable?
I think he's riffing on the famous line about thermodynamics, in
which one Prof claims there are only two people in the world who
really understand it, and the other one... Well, you know.

Ironic humour aside, one of the most helpful articles about
copyright I've ever run across is the US Library of Congress/
Copyright Office copyright FAQ. Link temporarily misplaced,
but I'm sure you can find it!
Jun 27 '08 #7
David Stone wrote:
In article
<41**********************************@c58g2000hsc. googlegroups.com>,
Andy Dingley <di*****@codesmiths.comwrote:
>On 11 Jun, 09:33, "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorp...@cs.tut.fiwrote:
>>Spectators need to be warned that there are probably only two people in
the world who really know and understand copyright in the worldwide
context, neither of them is participating this discussion, and they
disagree on pretty much everything.
Who might they be, and have they published anything readable?

I think he's riffing on the famous line about thermodynamics, in
which one Prof claims there are only two people in the world who
really understand it, and the other one... Well, you know.

Ironic humour aside, one of the most helpful articles about
copyright I've ever run across is the US Library of Congress/
Copyright Office copyright FAQ. Link temporarily misplaced,
but I'm sure you can find it!
Here's one:

http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ1.html

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net
Why do you always turn down your radio when looking for an address?
Jun 27 '08 #8
I'm in the process of putting up a website -- my first. There's a
number of tools (like WinHTTrack) that allow an entire site to be
copied to someone's hard drive to be examined at their leisure. Does
anyone know of a method to prevent tools like this from working? I
want people to visit my site, but I also want the stuff that's under
the hood to stay under the hood.
a web site is something public, and the web has been designed to share
info (not to protect) so there is not a valid way to protect it. But if
there is some content you really want to protect, you can pack it as
ebook, with a tool that provides encryption and secure protection, e.g.
with ebookswriter.

--

ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸
http://www.HyperPublish.com Catalogs, CD and sites with 1 tool
http://www.EasyWebEditor.com Create a nice Web site with ease
http://www.1site.info A professional Website quickly
http://www.EBooksWriter.com Discover the artist inside you!
http://www.PaperKiller.com Manuals, HTMLHelp, CHM quickly
http://www.CdFrontEnd.com Create autorun CD presentations

Visual Vision - http://visualvision.com http://visualvision.it
leader in hypertext authoring [ASP members, ESC members]
Jun 27 '08 #9
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:55:00 -0700 from David E. Ross
<no****@nowhere.not>:
You must then exert the effort to locate violations of your copyright
and enforce it. This is generally done only for commercial use of your
work since there is a right of fair use for limited non-commercial use.
Sorry, but that's just wrong. Whether the use is commercial or non-
commercial has *nothing* to do with whether it is an infringement,
though it may have something to do with the amount of damages if it
is an infringement.

You need to read Brad Templeton's Copyright Myths.

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2.1 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Why We Won't Help You:
http://diveintomark.org/archives/200..._wont_help_you
Jun 27 '08 #10
Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:15:15 -0400 from David Stone
<no******@domain.invalid>:
I think he's riffing on the famous line about thermodynamics, in
which one Prof claims there are only two people in the world who
really understand it, and the other one... Well, you know.
Not thermodynamics, but general relativity, if I recall correctly.

And *that* was an adaptation of ?Gladstone's famous statement about
the Schleswig-Holstein question of the 1840s through 1860s: that only
three people understood it: one was dead, one had gone mad, and the
third was himself.

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2.1 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Why We Won't Help You:
http://diveintomark.org/archives/200..._wont_help_you
Jun 27 '08 #11
On 12 Jun, 03:10, Stan Brown <the_stan_br...@fastmail.fmwrote:
And *that* was an adaptation of ?Gladstone's famous statement about
the Schleswig-Holstein question of the 1840s through 1860s: that only
three people understood it: one was dead, one had gone mad, and the
third was himself.
In addition, AFAIR that quotation wasn't especially famous until it
was repeated in a Sherlock Holmes story (I think Mycroft was claimed
to be the only one who understood it).
Jun 27 '08 #12
On 6/11/2008 7:09 PM, Stan Brown wrote:
Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:55:00 -0700 from David E. Ross
<no****@nowhere.not>:
>You must then exert the effort to locate violations of your copyright
and enforce it. This is generally done only for commercial use of your
work since there is a right of fair use for limited non-commercial use.

Sorry, but that's just wrong. Whether the use is commercial or non-
commercial has *nothing* to do with whether it is an infringement,
though it may have something to do with the amount of damages if it
is an infringement.

You need to read Brad Templeton's Copyright Myths.
Yes, infringement is infringement whether it's commercial or
non-commercial. However, the effort to enforce a copyright is generally
expended only where monetary damages can be determined, which most often
involves commercial infringement.

Note that file-sharing of music, by reducing the sales of CDs, is indeed
a form of commercial infringement. In this case, someone obtains a copy
for free when it would have otherwise be purchased.

--
David Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>

Have you been using Netscape and now feel abandoned by AOL?
Then use SeaMonkey. Go to <http://www.seamonkey-project.org/>.
Jun 27 '08 #13
Andy Dingley wrote:
On 11 Jun, 09:33, "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorp...@cs.tut.fiwrote:
>Spectators need to be warned that there are probably only two people in
the world who really know and understand copyright in the worldwide
context, neither of them is participating this discussion, and they
disagree on pretty much everything.

Who might they be, and have they published anything readable?

(Lessig?)
If Larry's one of the two Jukka had in mind (though I, like David,
assumed he was speaking in metaphor, and not of two actual
individuals), then we can safely decrement the number - unless we mean
something rather unusual by "know and understand" in this context.

I have a friend who is a lawyer and rhetorician, who has studied
various questions of "online" intellectual property at length (and
presented and published on them), and I believe she would agree that
the situation is, indeed, unclear.

In short: it is not technically possible to "protect" content that is
made public; it is not legally possible to "protect" many aspects of
it (and largely impractical to enforce what legal protections do
exist); and most people don't care, and neither should the OP.

--
Michael Wojcik
Micro Focus
Rhetoric & Writing, Michigan State University
Jun 27 '08 #14
VisualVision wrote:
>
But if
there is some content you really want to protect, you can pack it as
ebook, with a tool that provides encryption and secure protection, e.g.
with ebookswriter.
And if someone cares enough to steal it, they'll just scrape the text
off the screen, OCR'ing it if necessary. Or record it as they read it
with screen-capture software. Or read it aloud into dictation software.

There is no such thing as "secure protection" of information that you
hand to remote users. You cannot give someone data and then take it back.

You can make things less convenient for users who will do things you
don't want them to do, but usually at the cost of making them less
convenient for the users who will use it as you intend, and for
yourself as well. And, frankly, it's unlikely that J Random Author
will produce content of such transcendent greatness that anyone will
really care, so all you're probably doing is losing part of your audience.

If you don't want people to learn your tricks, take up stage magic.

--
Michael Wojcik
Micro Focus
Rhetoric & Writing, Michigan State University
Jun 27 '08 #15
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:20:46 -0400, Michael Wojcik <mw*****@newsguy.com>
wrote:
>Andy Dingley wrote:
>On 11 Jun, 09:33, "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorp...@cs.tut.fiwrote:
>>Spectators need to be warned that there are probably only two people in
the world who really know and understand copyright in the worldwide
context, neither of them is participating this discussion, and they
disagree on pretty much everything.

Who might they be, and have they published anything readable?

(Lessig?)

If Larry's one of the two Jukka had in mind (though I, like David,
assumed he was speaking in metaphor, and not of two actual
individuals), then we can safely decrement the number - unless we mean
something rather unusual by "know and understand" in this context.
So was that a yes?

Jun 27 '08 #16
Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:16:57 -0700 from David E. Ross
<no****@nowhere.not>:
Yes, infringement is infringement whether it's commercial or
non-commercial. However, the effort to enforce a copyright is generally
expended only where monetary damages can be determined, which most often
involves commercial infringement.
Wrong again. You *really* need to check your facts before posting.

If the copyright is registered, then there are *statutory* damages,
and the copyright owner doesn't have to prove even one cent in actual
damages.

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2.1 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Why We Won't Help You:
http://diveintomark.org/archives/200..._wont_help_you
Jun 27 '08 #17
In article <k0********************************@4ax.com>,
Andy Dingley <di*****@codesmiths.comwrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:20:46 -0400, Michael Wojcik <mw*****@newsguy.com>
wrote:
Andy Dingley wrote:
On 11 Jun, 09:33, "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorp...@cs.tut.fiwrote:

Spectators need to be warned that there are probably only two people in
the world who really know and understand copyright in the worldwide
context, neither of them is participating this discussion, and they
disagree on pretty much everything.

Who might they be, and have they published anything readable?

(Lessig?)
If Larry's one of the two Jukka had in mind (though I, like David,
assumed he was speaking in metaphor, and not of two actual
individuals), then we can safely decrement the number - unless we mean
something rather unusual by "know and understand" in this context.

So was that a yes?
A definite "maybe"!
Jun 27 '08 #18
In comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html message <MPG.22ba4fbf697a05a098b6
97@news.individual.net>, Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:10:55, Stan Brown
<th************@fastmail.fmposted:
>And *that* was an adaptation of ?Gladstone's famous statement about
the Schleswig-Holstein question of the 1840s through 1860s: that only
three people understood it: one was dead, one had gone mad, and the
third was himself.

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schleswig-Holstein_Question:

"Only three people understood the Schleswig-Holstein Question. The first
was Albert, the Prince consort and he is dead; the second is a German
professor, and he is in an asylum: and the third was myself - and I have
forgotten it." - Lord Palmerston.

--
(c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05.
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/- w. FAQish topics, links, acronyms
PAS EXE etc : <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/programs/- see 00index.htm
Dates - miscdate.htm moredate.htm js-dates.htm pas-time.htm critdate.htm etc.
Jun 27 '08 #19
Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:35:10 +0100 from Dr J R Stockton
<jr*@merlyn.demon.co.uk>:
In comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html message <MPG.22ba4fbf697a05a098b6
97@news.individual.net>, Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:10:55, Stan Brown
<th************@fastmail.fmposted:
And *that* was an adaptation of ?Gladstone's famous statement about
the Schleswig-Holstein question of the 1840s through 1860s: that only
three people understood it: one was dead, one had gone mad, and the
third was himself.


<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schleswig-Holstein_Question:

"Only three people understood the Schleswig-Holstein Question. The first
was Albert, the Prince consort and he is dead; the second is a German
professor, and he is in an asylum: and the third was myself - and I have
forgotten it." - Lord Palmerston.
Palmerston, not Gladstone -- I'm always getting those two mixed up.
:-)

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2.1 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Why We Won't Help You:
http://diveintomark.org/archives/200..._wont_help_you
Jun 27 '08 #20
In comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html message <MPG.22bbba904e0dbca698b6
99@news.individual.net>, Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:58:58, Stan Brown
<th************@fastmail.fmposted:
>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:16:57 -0700 from David E. Ross
<no****@nowhere.not>:
>Yes, infringement is infringement whether it's commercial or
non-commercial. However, the effort to enforce a copyright is generally
expended only where monetary damages can be determined, which most often
involves commercial infringement.

Wrong again. You *really* need to check your facts before posting.

If the copyright is registered, then there are *statutory* damages,
and the copyright owner doesn't have to prove even one cent in actual
damages.
Your statement of what is legally possible does not refute DER's
statement which includes "generally" and "most often".

Unless you have reason to believe that your statement is applicable in
all jurisdictions world-wide, it lacks an essential qualification.

In respect of <www.spu.ac.th/y2k/Critdate.htm>, I tend to agree with
DER, independently of considerations of registration.

--
(c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk Turnpike v6.05.
Web <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/- w. FAQish topics, links, acronyms
PAS EXE etc : <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/programs/- see 00index.htm
Dates - miscdate.htm moredate.htm js-dates.htm pas-time.htm critdate.htm etc.
Jun 27 '08 #21
Dr J R Stockton wrote:
In comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html message <MPG.22bbba904e0dbca698b6
99@news.individual.net>, Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:58:58, Stan Brown
<th************@fastmail.fmposted:
>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:16:57 -0700 from David E. Ross
<no****@nowhere.not>:
>>Yes, infringement is infringement whether it's commercial or
non-commercial. However, the effort to enforce a copyright is generally
expended only where monetary damages can be determined, which most often
involves commercial infringement.
Wrong again. You *really* need to check your facts before posting.

If the copyright is registered, then there are *statutory* damages,
and the copyright owner doesn't have to prove even one cent in actual
damages.

Your statement of what is legally possible does not refute DER's
statement which includes "generally" and "most often".

Unless you have reason to believe that your statement is applicable in
all jurisdictions world-wide, it lacks an essential qualification.

In respect of <www.spu.ac.th/y2k/Critdate.htm>, I tend to agree with
DER, independently of considerations of registration.
For those wanting to play lawyer:

http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html

Search for "statutory" to start.

This is U.S. Copyright Law. It may have impact in other jurisdictions,
I make no claim of such. It does support Stan's statement.

David's statement is also true in that "... the effort to enforce a
copyright is generally expended only where monetary damages can be
determined ..." In fact, that's generally true: Lawsuits are seldom
pursued if there is no hope of sinning substantial monetary damages.

--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net
I tried sniffing Coke once, but the ice cubes froze the end of my nose.
Jun 27 '08 #22

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

2
by: Greg | last post by:
Is there an easy way to design a service that "listens" for attempts to add files to a specified directory, and on detecting an attempt starting another exe? I've no idea how feasible it is without...
3
by: peter.meth | last post by:
Hi All, I am making a file manager type of application and am trying to duplicate Windows Explorer's behaviour when copying files; ie, display a second form with the copy files animation. As it...
0
by: anupamak | last post by:
Hello I am working on USB Project, I am searching for any of the API's method in windows , so that my application can sense that a file in the PC is being copied or moved onto the USB mass storage...
4
by: Tony M | last post by:
I'm trying copy asp .net pages from one website (where it works fine) to another. CusAdd.aspx.vb and CusAdd.aspx I tried to just copy it and also tried to "Add Existing Item" When I try to...
3
by: Hooyoo | last post by:
Hi, everyone here. I need to protect my data in GridView from being copied, do you guys have any good methods? Thanks in advance.
0
by: whitesmith | last post by:
Hello, I'm in the process of putting up a website -- my first. There's a number of tools (like WinHTTrack) that allow an entire site to be copied to someone's hard drive to be examined at their...
0
by: Coder | last post by:
Hello I want to prevent my Clickonce deployed application being copied and run to another machine, Possible?
12
by: gravesk | last post by:
am using Access 2003, and am not very familiar with Access or its terminology. I am not at all familiar with VB. I created a form from a query, and everything is generally working fine. One of...
1
by: ukfusion | last post by:
Hi Sorry if i'm not posting in the right category. I have a function on my website which I need to run twice a week....on 2 specific days. i need this to run without any interaction...no button...
0
by: DolphinDB | last post by:
The formulas of 101 quantitative trading alphas used by WorldQuant were presented in the paper 101 Formulaic Alphas. However, some formulas are complex, leading to challenges in calculation. Take...
0
by: DolphinDB | last post by:
Tired of spending countless mintues downsampling your data? Look no further! In this article, you’ll learn how to efficiently downsample 6.48 billion high-frequency records to 61 million...
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
ExcelToDatabase: batch import excel into database automatically...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
0
by: Vimpel783 | last post by:
Hello! Guys, I found this code on the Internet, but I need to modify it a little. It works well, the problem is this: Data is sent from only one cell, in this case B5, but it is necessary that data...
0
by: jfyes | last post by:
As a hardware engineer, after seeing that CEIWEI recently released a new tool for Modbus RTU Over TCP/UDP filtering and monitoring, I actively went to its official website to take a look. It turned...
1
by: PapaRatzi | last post by:
Hello, I am teaching myself MS Access forms design and Visual Basic. I've created a table to capture a list of Top 30 singles and forms to capture new entries. The final step is a form (unbound)...
0
by: af34tf | last post by:
Hi Guys, I have a domain whose name is BytesLimited.com, and I want to sell it. Does anyone know about platforms that allow me to list my domain in auction for free. Thank you
0
by: Faith0G | last post by:
I am starting a new it consulting business and it's been a while since I setup a new website. Is wordpress still the best web based software for hosting a 5 page website? The webpages will be...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.