In music (apparently) when listing a composer's compositions, a single
asterisk against a performance item denotes that it is a premiere (i.e.
in that country), and two asterisks that it is a world premiere.
See for example "Selected Compositions" at:
<http://www.cf.ac.uk/music/people/JW.html>
I haven't been able to discover so far whether this is a genuine
convention, understood universally (I certainly hadn't come across it
before).
If it is, how would one best mark up such information?
Daniele 14 2349
D.M. Procida wrote:
I haven't been able to discover so far whether this is a genuine
convention, understood universally (I certainly hadn't come across it
before).
If it is, how would one best mark up such information?
Are you asking how to get the asterisks there, or how to indicate what
they mean?
There's nothing obviously special about the asterisks in the webpage you
reference. To my eyes they look like footnote references, but the
footnotes themselves are not there.
I think there is specific HTML for footnotes, but it is rarely used. It
would be nice if the asterisks caused your browser to jump to such
footnotes (footnotes that I cannot find drive me insane).
--
Steve Swift http://www.swiftys.org.uk/swifty.html http://www.ringers.org.uk
Steve Swift <St***********@gmail.comwrote:
I haven't been able to discover so far whether this is a genuine
convention, understood universally (I certainly hadn't come across it
before).
If it is, how would one best mark up such information?
Are you asking how to get the asterisks there, or how to indicate what
they mean?
There's nothing obviously special about the asterisks in the webpage you
reference. To my eyes they look like footnote references, but the
footnotes themselves are not there.
I think there is specific HTML for footnotes, but it is rarely used. It
would be nice if the asterisks caused your browser to jump to such
footnotes (footnotes that I cannot find drive me insane).
No, they aren't footnotes. They simply indicate - and this is apparently
a convention - premiere performances.
Daniele
Jukka K. Korpela <jk******@cs.tut.fiwrote:
In music (apparently) when listing a composer's compositions, a single
asterisk against a performance item denotes that it is a premiere
(i.e. in that country), and two asterisks that it is a world premiere.
- -
I haven't been able to discover so far whether this is a genuine
convention, understood universally (I certainly hadn't come across it
before).
This isn't really about HTML, is it? Or even web authoring in general?
Kind of unsurprising, since you deleted my question about the way to
mark up this kind of information in HTML.
Daniele
On 2008-01-22, Jukka K. Korpela <jk******@cs.tut.fiwrote:
[...]
>and an unlinked explanatory footnote to explain it.
Footnote? No. The sensible thing to do is to explain any unusual
notations (i.e., notations that may be unusual to a considerable part of
the audience) _before_ you use them. It usually doesn't hurt to _repeat_
the explanation at the end, since some people will probably look at the
end if they forgot or missed the initial explanation
One expects to see the explanation of * and ** at the end since they are
often used as footnote markers.
Ben C wrote:
On 2008-01-22, Jukka K. Korpela <jk******@cs.tut.fiwrote:
[...]
>>and an unlinked explanatory footnote to explain it.
Footnote? No. The sensible thing to do is to explain any unusual notations (i.e., notations that may be unusual to a considerable part of the audience) _before_ you use them. It usually doesn't hurt to _repeat_ the explanation at the end, since some people will probably look at the end if they forgot or missed the initial explanation
One expects to see the explanation of * and ** at the end since they are
often used as footnote markers.
But when they are used as footnote references they follow the text they
are being used to annotate. Here, they precede the text.
In any event, it's useful for a key to precede the material that it
explains, and it's particularly beneficial from the perspective of
accessibility since it informs blind users what they're going to
encounter before they encounter it.
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
Because we need to talk of such a thing, and "abbreviation" is already a
word for it. Check a dictionary if in doubt.
Strange point of view, when even your own page at http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/latin1/3.html#2A indicates that one
possible use for asterisk is:
"the asterisk is often used as a wildcard character which matches any
string of characters."
So by your own definition "*" becomes the ultimate abbreviation for
"première", but with all of the original letters removed from the
abbreviation, with the "*" signifying its presence.
--
Steve Swift http://www.swiftys.org.uk/swifty.html http://www.ringers.org.uk
Steve Swift wrote:
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
>Because we need to talk of such a thing, and "abbreviation" is already a word for it. Check a dictionary if in doubt.
Strange point of view, when even your own page at http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/latin1/3.html#2A indicates that one
possible use for asterisk is:
"the asterisk is often used as a wildcard character which matches any
string of characters."
So by your own definition "*" becomes the ultimate abbreviation for
"première", but with all of the original letters removed from the
abbreviation, with the "*" signifying its presence.
LOL
I have a lot to say about this topic, but to save time and space I'll
write it thusly:
*
--
John
"Jukka K. Korpela" <jk******@cs.tut.fiwrites:
Scripsit Andy Dingley:
>Why should abbreviation be necessarily limited to a literal subset of the characters from the defining term?
Because we need to talk of such a thing, and "abbreviation"
is already a word for it. Check a dictionary if in doubt.
The OED:
3. esp. A shortened form of a spoken word, or written
symbol; a part of a word or symbol standing for the
whole.
--
Jón Fairbairn Jo***********@cl.cam.ac.uk
Scripsit Steve Swift:
Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
>Because we need to talk of such a thing, and "abbreviation" is already a word for it. Check a dictionary if in doubt.
Strange point of view, when even your own page at http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/latin1/3.html#2A indicates that one
possible use for asterisk is:
"the asterisk is often used as a wildcard character which matches any
string of characters."
Where does the word "abbreviation" or its abbreviation appear there?
Did you already check a dictionary? Did you proceed from A
(abbreviation) to S (symbol) already?
So by your own definition "*" becomes the ultimate abbreviation for
"première",
My description of asterisk usage was no definition, and the asterisk is
not an abbreviation. If I have somewhere called it an abbreviation, that
would be a mistake, just as if anyone else had done that.
but with all of the original letters removed from the
abbreviation, with the "*" signifying its presence.
It sounds like you have no idea of what wildcards are. I guess you have
some but now you pretend to be ignorant.
--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca") http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Scripsit Jon Fairbairn:
The OED:
3. esp. A shortened form of a spoken word, or written
symbol; a part of a word or symbol standing for the
whole.
Get a better dictionary, like Merriam-Webster:
"Abbreviation
1 : the act or result of abbreviating : abridgment
2 : a shortened form of a written word or phrase used in place of the
whole <amt is an abbreviation for amount>"
The OED is obscure here, since if parsed as "(A shortened form of a
spoken word)", or (written symbol)", it means that any written symbol
(e.g., "I" when used as a personal pronoun) is an abbreviation. If
parsed as "A shortened form of ((a spoken word), or (written symbol))",
it's slightly ungrammatical but makes more sense: in principle, non-word
symbols may have abbreviations, too.
--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca") http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
On 23 Jan, 13:55, Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removet...@comcast.net>
wrote:
The OED:
3. esp. A shortened form of a spoken word, or written
symbol; a part of a word or symbol standing for the
whole.
Get a better dictionary, like Merriam-Webster:
ROFL. What audacity.
What ambiguity. Although the real OED (any edition) is fine, as is
the Compact, the affordable abridged or concise editions are just too
abridged to be of much use at this level.
A real OED isn't cheap either. A S/H Compact is about £100, new full
OEDs are £500. Unless you're an academic or a particularly dedicated
sort of harmless drudge, you're unlikely to have access.
Andy Dingley wrote:
On 23 Jan, 13:55, Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removet...@comcast.net>
wrote:
>>>The OED: 3. esp. A shortened form of a spoken word, or written symbol; a part of a word or symbol standing for the whole. Get a better dictionary, like Merriam-Webster:
ROFL. What audacity.
What ambiguity. Although the real OED (any edition) is fine, as is
the Compact, the affordable abridged or concise editions are just too
abridged to be of much use at this level.
A real OED isn't cheap either. A S/H Compact is about £100, new full
OEDs are £500. Unless you're an academic or a particularly dedicated
sort of harmless drudge, you're unlikely to have access.
I have full online OED access through my county public library's
website. It's a great feature.
Scripsit Harlan Messinger:
I agree that the wording is poor. The W3C HTML specification is often
worded more poorly than that, so I suppose we should disregard its
substance as well.
Of course - in the issue of ABBR and ACRONYM. It's just confusion after
confusion, and waste of everyone's time.
--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca") http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Andy Dingley <di*****@codesmiths.comwrites:
On 23 Jan, 13:55, Harlan Messinger <hmessinger.removet...@comcast.net>
wrote:
>The OED:
> 3. esp. A shortened form of a spoken word, or written symbol; a part of a word or symbol standing for the whole.
Get a better dictionary, like Merriam-Webster:
ROFL. What audacity.
What ambiguity. Although the real OED (any edition) is fine, as is
the Compact, the affordable abridged or concise editions are just too
abridged to be of much use at this level.
I quoted from the full (online) version. The ambiguity is unfortunate.
--
Jón Fairbairn Jo***********@cl.cam.ac.uk This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Kim Scarborough |
last post by:
Say I wanted to put a couple lines of asterisks between paragraphs, and have
it stretch the spaces so that it spanned 100% of the text-width, like this:
* * * * * ...
|
by: Steve |
last post by:
I'd like to create a form where required fields are marked by
asterisks. The asterisks would then disappear as the field or
checkbox is filled in by the user.
If there's a way to do this with...
|
by: Susan Bricker |
last post by:
I would like to have a transparent command button on my Main Menu to
cause an Inputbox( ) to be displayed for the user to enter a password.
This is to control the enabling of Bypass Key (shift). ...
|
by: John |
last post by:
hi,
i have created a search form, and i want to search for a specific item in a
field.
e.g. i have a field called colour, which has record1 = 'red, blue, green'
and another record2 = 'red'
...
|
by: vykkilynn |
last post by:
My homework this week involved using the for statement to create loops that would display triangles. The only output we're allowed to use are forms of the print statements... i.e. print(),...
|
by: The Coding Queen |
last post by:
Hi guys, it's nice to be here.
I know this is really very simple but I am only an intermediate when it comes to database programming.
Please could someone send me some very simple (and...
|
by: Jim Langston |
last post by:
I remember there was a thread a while back that was talking about using the
return value of a function as a reference where I had thought the reference
would become invalidated because it was a...
|
by: ab12 |
last post by:
I'm trying to write a program in C that gets a shape outlined with asterisks from the user, and returns that shape filled with asterisks. It will also get the coordinates of a point inside the shape...
|
by: sureshl |
last post by:
JavaScript Experts,
I have the following HTML. How could I use JavaScript such that when a user clicks on the checkbox in each row the phone numbers and e-mail addresses are partially obfuscated...
|
by: Charles Arthur |
last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
|
by: aa123db |
last post by:
Variable and constants
Use var or let for variables and const fror constants.
Var foo ='bar';
Let foo ='bar';const baz ='bar';
Functions
function $name$ ($parameters$) {
}
...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
If we have dozens or hundreds of excel to import into the database, if we use the excel import function provided by database editors such as navicat, it will be extremely tedious and time-consuming...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
| |