Problem when switching to CSS

[don]

Hi,

I redesigned a website and changed from table code to pure CSS. A a
result, something strange has occured. In IE and Opera, all is OK.
However, in Firefox and Netscape, some of my links no longer work.

For an example, go to: http://www.fivestarterminals.com/

Half way down is a "contact us" link. It is active using IE but
innactive using Firefox.

I am perplexed ???????????????

Thanks,
Don

[Jukka K. Korpela]

Scripsit do*@fivestarterminals.com:

Hi,

I almost considered spending my time to help you. Then I noticed you had
multiposted your question. I'm not amused.

--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

[Bergamot]

do*@fivestarterminals.com wrote:

>
http://www.fivestarterminals.com/

Half way down is a "contact us" link. It is active using IE but
innactive using Firefox.

If you haven't already done so, install the Web Developer extension for
Firefox. Then turn on outlines for block elements.

You should then see one of the evils of absolute positioning.

--
Berg

[El Kabong]

Well! I hate to think that you aren't amused, Yucky, but you know what? I'll
just learn to live with it.

Oh, My Gosh! I top=posted besides!

Are you crying now?

This person just needed some help and made more than one effort to get it.
That bothers you how? Why don't you just get over your pompous self?

El

"Jukka K. Korpela" <jk******@cs.tut.fiwrote in message
news:gA*********************@reader1.news.saunalah ti.fi...

Scripsit do*@fivestarterminals.com:

>Hi,

I almost considered spending my time to help you. Then I noticed you had
multiposted your question. I'm not amused.

--
Jukka K. Korpela ("Yucca")
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Talbot?=]

El Kabong wrote :

Well! I hate to think that you aren't amused, Yucky, but you know what? I'll
just learn to live with it.

Oh, My Gosh! I top=posted besides!

Are you crying now?

This person just needed some help and made more than one effort to get it.
That bothers you how? Why don't you just get over your pompous self?

El

Anyone who multi-post is defeating the purpose of forum newsgroup
discussion.
Anyone who multi-post is fragmenting unneedlessly a possible discussion.
Anyone who top-post is not helping others who would want to answer.
Anyone who top-post is annoying readers of posted messages and is not
promoting the purpose of his own posts.
Anyone multiposting or top-posting should be invited to comply with best
posting guidelines: it's in their best interests to begin with.

Gérard
--
Using Web Standards in your Web Pages (Updated Apr. 2007)
http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs...your_Web_Pages

[El Kabong]

"Gérard Talbot" <ne***********@gtalbot.orgwrote in message
news:13*************@corp.supernews.com...

Anyone who multi-post is defeating the purpose of forum newsgroup
discussion.
Anyone who multi-post is fragmenting unneedlessly a possible discussion.
Anyone who top-post is not helping others who would want to answer.
Anyone who top-post is annoying readers of posted messages and is not
promoting the purpose of his own posts.
Anyone multiposting or top-posting should be invited to comply with best
posting guidelines: it's in their best interests to begin with.

Thank you, Gerard. Your response was informative, concise and totally absent
sarcasm, unlike Mr. Korpola's.

Good manners beget good manners.

El

[dorayme]

In article <UOp3i.51$vp1.23@trnddc06>,
"El Kabong" <da********@verizon.netwrote:

"Gérard Talbot" <ne***********@gtalbot.orgwrote in message
news:13*************@corp.supernews.com...

Anyone who multi-post is defeating the purpose of forum newsgroup
discussion.
Anyone who multi-post is fragmenting unneedlessly a possible discussion.
Anyone who top-post is not helping others who would want to answer.
Anyone who top-post is annoying readers of posted messages and is not
promoting the purpose of his own posts.
Anyone multiposting or top-posting should be invited to comply with best
posting guidelines: it's in their best interests to begin with.

Thank you, Gerard. Your response was informative, concise and totally absent
sarcasm, unlike Mr. Korpola's.

While mainly agreeing with the sentiments from GT, your response
makes me want to say that it was not exactly concise considering
the repetition. Also, "Informative" would apply more if the post
was not quite so concise (the energy wasted in repetition could
have been better spent in further explanation).

Good manners beget good manners.

But not necessarily good grammar (missing "s"s at the end of
"multi-post".

Nor good spelling or care in using personal references: it is
Korpela, not Korpola.

--
dorayme

[El Kabong]

"dorayme" <do************@optusnet.com.auwrote in message
news:do**********************************@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...

>
While mainly agreeing with the sentiments from GT, your response
makes me want to say that it was not exactly concise considering
the repetition. Also, "Informative" would apply more if the post
was not quite so concise (the energy wasted in repetition could
have been better spent in further explanation).

>Good manners beget good manners.

But not necessarily good grammar (missing "s"s at the end of
"multi-post".

Nor good spelling or care in using personal references: it is
Korpela, not Korpola.

--
dorayme

Good points all, but I think I made mine.

El