By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
438,445 Members | 1,159 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 438,445 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

CSS The web would be a better place

P: n/a
Typical programmer's arrogance I would say, each one thinking his/her own
solution is the best without listening to reason or cooperating.

The web would be a better place if all these major browsers simply agreed on
a rendering engine that rendered the CSS in the same way. Then there would
be no ugly hacks and God knows how many millions of man hours would be saved
by not having to develop CSS hacks

Right? well, I guess it might be possible in the year 3000.
Apr 14 '07 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
3 Replies


P: n/a
On 2007-04-14, .... www.FocusOnPanama.com .... <fi*******@mailbox.nowwrote:
Typical programmer's arrogance I would say, each one thinking his/her own
solution is the best without listening to reason or cooperating.
Only Microsoft.
The web would be a better place if all these major browsers simply
agreed on a rendering engine that rendered the CSS in the same way.
They have, except for IE.
Apr 14 '07 #2

P: n/a
In article <46***********************@news.wanadoo.nl>,
".... www.FocusOnPanama.com ...." <fi*******@mailbox.now>
wrote:
The web would be a better place if all these major browsers simply agreed on
a rendering engine that rendered the CSS in the same way. Then there would
be no ugly hacks and God knows how many millions of man hours would be saved
by not having to develop CSS hacks

Right? well, I guess it might be possible in the year 3000.
You are talking about a time when I assume control of the whole
world and everything will be done right, .... or else.

--
dorayme
Apr 14 '07 #3

P: n/a
At 09:48:34 on Sun, 15 Apr 2007, dorayme
<do************@optusnet.com.auwrote in
<do**********************************@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>:
>In article <46***********************@news.wanadoo.nl>,
".... www.FocusOnPanama.com ...." <fi*******@mailbox.now>
wrote:
>Right? well, I guess it might be possible in the year 3000.

You are talking about a time when I assume control of the whole
world and everything will be done right, .... or else.
You're going to be far too old to pull, though, so what'll be the point?
--
Molly Mockford
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety - Benjamin Franklin
(My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not remain so for ever.)
Apr 15 '07 #4

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.