By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
437,648 Members | 1,198 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 437,648 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

My latest CSS-3 overrides.

P: n/a
Hi T_Wake, Speaking of my userContent.CSS, You told me:

The text follows an inline image
unless the CSS gives it a float value which allows it to overwrite text.

Web pages can't override my " position: static " and " float: none ";
so maybe that's why I had to add " vertical-align: baseline ".

Google now looks like this to me:

http://www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/...ups_Browse.PNG
http://Google.COM/group/comp.os.linu...f%E2%80%A6Relf

http://www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/...ups_Search.PNG
http://Google.COM/groups/search?q=Jeff%E2%80%A6Relf

http://www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/...roups_Post.PNG
http://Google.COM/group/sci.physics/...64b8516b2d5b57

http://www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/...Groups_MID.PNG
http://Google.COM/advanced_group_search

www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/CSS.PNG
http://Google.COM/images?imgsz=xxlar...2black+hole%22

My latest CSS-3 overrides:

www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf
www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/userContent.CSS
www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/userChrome.CSS

" Desktop --Properties --Display --Appearance " settings for Windows-XP:

www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/Jeff_Relf.Theme
Jan 16 '07 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
4 Replies


P: n/a

Jeff...Relf wrote:
Hi T_Wake, Speaking of my userContent.CSS, You told me:

The text follows an inline image
unless the CSS gives it a float value which allows it to overwrite text.

Web pages can't override my " position: static " and " float: none ";
so maybe that's why I had to add " vertical-align: baseline ".
So what the fuck does this have to do with _physics_ ?!
>
Google now looks like this to me:

http://www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/...ups_Browse.PNG
http://Google.COM/group/comp.os.linu...f%E2%80%A6Relf

http://www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/...ups_Search.PNG
http://Google.COM/groups/search?q=Jeff%E2%80%A6Relf

http://www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/...roups_Post.PNG
http://Google.COM/group/sci.physics/...64b8516b2d5b57

http://www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/...Groups_MID.PNG
http://Google.COM/advanced_group_search

www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/CSS.PNG
http://Google.COM/images?imgsz=xxlar...2black+hole%22

My latest CSS-3 overrides:

www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf
www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/userContent.CSS
www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/userChrome.CSS

" Desktop --Properties --Display --Appearance " settings for Windows-XP:

www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/Jeff_Relf.Theme
Jan 16 '07 #2

P: n/a

"Jeff.Relf" <Je*******@Yahoo.COMwrote in message
news:Je**********************@Cotse.NET...
Hi T_Wake, Speaking of my userContent.CSS, You told me:

The text follows an inline image
unless the CSS gives it a float value which allows it to overwrite text.

Web pages can't override my " position: static " and " float: none ";
so maybe that's why I had to add " vertical-align: baseline ".
Well, Jeff, while I applaud the fact that your torture of CSS has at least
had the beneficial consequence of stopping you posting on sci.physics I
still lament the fact it hasn't stopped you.

Your idea of an attractive web page is shocking. I am amazed you have any
eyesight remaining.
Jan 16 '07 #3

P: n/a

Eric Gisse wrote:
So what the fuck does this have to do with _physics_ ?!
Physics and CSS both seem to be parakookmagnetic. They both only exist
in the presence of an applied field, so it's best to ignore them.

Jan 16 '07 #4

P: n/a
Hi T_Wake, Speaking of my userContent.CSS, You told me:

Your idea of an attractive web page is shocking.

Now, when I do a search on Google Groups, this is what it looks like:

http://www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/...ups_Search.PNG
http://Google.COM/groups/search?q=Jeff%E2%80%A6Relf

http://www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/...ups_Browse.PNG
http://Google.COM/group/comp.os.linu...f%E2%80%A6Relf

http://www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/...roups_Post.PNG
http://Google.COM/group/sci.physics/...64b8516b2d5b57

http://www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/...Groups_MID.PNG
http://Google.COM/advanced_group_search

www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/CSS.PNG
http://Google.COM/images?imgsz=xxlar...2black+hole%22

Looking at the IE7 version of those links literally hurts my eyes !
it's way, way too bright. ( I fanatically control all light sources )

Also, Google_Groups on IE7 restricts posts to a very narrow middle column,
altering whitespace... I _Hate_ that... altering whitespace is a crime.
Unfortuantely, because most authors are lazy and uneducated,
I have to alter the whitespace of most web pages.

My CSS-3 rules don't alter the the whitespace of Usenet posts !
yet, elsewhere, horizontal scrolling is almost totally eliminated !

I even removed the " Tree View " link, as I couldn't find a way to
" inline " the left-side pane. ( i.e. I coudn't kill the " frameset " )

I killed everything that annoyed me at Google, including it's " alerts ":

@-moz-document domain(google.com) {

img[ src *= ".gif" ]:not( [ src *= "?q=" ] ), a.nu
, div[ id *= ratings ], a[ href *= "/options" ][ onclick ]
, a[ href *= "&sa=F" ], a[ id = logo ]
, a[ href *= "/imghp?hl" ], a[ href *= Logout ], a[ href *= signout ]
, iframe[ name = google_ads_frame ]
, span[ class = "fontsize3 gl"], table[ id = rn ]
, a[ href *= "/alerts?" ], table.lsh, a[ href *= "?tvc=" ] {
display: none !important; } }

On every page, I kill:

html :link[onmouseover], div[ id = ticker_div ]
, scrollbarbutton:not( [ sbattr = scrollbar-down-bottom ] )
, embed, style, script, noscript, br {
display: none !important; }

input br, textarea br { display: inline !important; }

My latest CSS-3 overrides:

www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/userContent.CSS
www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/userChrome.CSS

My " Desktop --Properties --Themes " settings for Windows-XP:

www.Cotse.NET/users/jeffrelf/Jeff_Relf.Theme

..+.+.+

Jan 16 '07 #5

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.