Your Boss is Watching Your Emails!!

[softwareengineer2006]

Your Boss is Watching Your Emails!!
Find out why and how you should encrypt your confidential emails before
sending
in my website
http://tinyurl.com/z4u8m

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

so******************@gmail.com wrote:

Your Boss is Watching Your Emails!!
Find out why and how you should encrypt your confidential emails
before sending in my website
hxxp://tinyurl.com/z4u8m

Having seen this identical post in other groups, I've concluded you are
just spamming/trolling for a hit-count.

--
-bts
-Warning: I brake for lawn deer

[ironcorona]

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

so******************@gmail.com wrote:

Your Boss is Watching Your Emails!!
Find out why and how you should encrypt your confidential emails
before sending in my website
hxxp://tinyurl.com/z4u8m

Having seen this identical post in other groups, I've concluded you are
just spamming/trolling for a hit-count.

Having seen the site in question where the google ads take up about 90%
of the content window I've concluded... well, see above!

--
ironcorona

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

ironcorona wrote:

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

so******************@gmail.com wrote:

Your Boss is Watching Your Emails!!
Find out why and how you should encrypt your confidential emails
before sending in my website
hxxp://tinyurl.com/z4u8m

Having seen this identical post in other groups, I've concluded you are
just spamming/trolling for a hit-count.

Having seen the site in question where the google ads take up about 90%
of the content window I've concluded... well, see above!

Exactly. Typical geoshitties crap, eh?

--
-bts
-Warning: I brake for lawn deer

[Stan Brown]

Sun, 07 May 2006 15:31:50 GMT from Beauregard T. Shagnasty
<a.*********@example.invalid>:

so******************@gmail.com wrote:

Your Boss is Watching Your Emails!!
Find out why and how you should encrypt your confidential emails
before sending in my website
hxxp://tinyurl.com/z4u8m

Having seen this identical post in other groups, I've concluded you are
just spamming/trolling for a hit-count.

Then why give publicity by reposting the URL?

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2.1 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Why We Won't Help You:
http://diveintomark.org/archives/200..._wont_help_you

[Beauregard T. Shagnasty]

Stan Brown wrote:

Sun, 07 May 2006 15:31:50 GMT from Beauregard T. Shagnasty
<a.*********@example.invalid>:

so******************@gmail.com wrote:

Your Boss is Watching Your Emails!!
Find out why and how you should encrypt your confidential emails
before sending in my website
hxxp://tinyurl.com/z4u8m

Having seen this identical post in other groups, I've concluded you are
just spamming/trolling for a hit-count.

Then why give publicity by reposting the URL?

Did you try clicking on it?

--
-bts
-Warning: I brake for lawn deer

[Stan Brown]

Mon, 08 May 2006 02:29:09 GMT from Beauregard T. Shagnasty
<a.*********@example.invalid>:

Stan Brown wrote:

Sun, 07 May 2006 15:31:50 GMT from Beauregard T. Shagnasty
<a.*********@example.invalid>:

so******************@gmail.com wrote:

Your Boss is Watching Your Emails!!
Find out why and how you should encrypt your confidential emails
before sending in my website
hxxp://tinyurl.com/z4u8m

Having seen this identical post in other groups, I've concluded you are
just spamming/trolling for a hit-count.

Then why give publicity by reposting the URL?

Did you try clicking on it?

Of course not -- but either

(1) It's correct if you change hxxp back to http, or
(2) it's not.

Either way, at best it's a waste of bandwidth and at worst it is, as
I said, giving extra publicity to the spammer.

Why repost ANY PART of spam? If it's wrong to post it once, it's even
more wrong to post it twice.

--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Tompkins County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com/
HTML 4.01 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/
validator: http://validator.w3.org/
CSS 2.1 spec: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/
validator: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Why We Won't Help You:
http://diveintomark.org/archives/200..._wont_help_you