On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, David Dorward wrote:
Andreas Prilop wrote:
It seems that Google is unable to "recognize" application/xhtml+xml:
Are they mad?
Nor can a default installation of Internet Explorer (which still holds a
majority marketshare), so there aren't many true XHTML documents out there.
Thus it probably isn't worth all that much to Google to chain an XML parser
into their search indexer.
(1)
Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP SP2 does display
http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nht...otation.x.html
(because of the suffix .html)
(2)
You misquoted me! You have corrupted my text!
My question "Are they mad?" was NOT under the sentence that Google
does not recognize application/xhtml+xml. It was under the link to
Google's cached version
http://google.com/search?q=cache:www...otation.x.html
Look at the source of the above and compare with the original at
http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nht...otation.x.html
They *changed* my <h1> to
<p><font size="6" face="helvetica"><b>
etc. etc.
Therefore I ask "Are they mad?".
--
The 6th of June is Bill Gates Day.