I have a very simple page, which shows 3 Quicktime movies in a table. I
think I'm using just standard simple HTML. In Netscape or Safari on a Mac,
they look fine. In Internet Explorer on a PC, the bottom of the movies are
cut off (size issues with the table cells). Could someone look at the html
here http://server.drmichaellevin.org/worm_supplement.html
and tell me why this is different on different platforms?
If you don't want to go to the URL, the code is this:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title>Untitled Document</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body>
<table width="75%" border="1">
<tr><td>Control</td><td>PCPA</td><td>Reserpine</td></tr>
<tr>
<td><EMBED SRC="Supplement1.mov" WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=300 AUTOPLAY=true
CONTROLLER=true LOOP=true PLUGINSPAGE=http://www.apple.com/quicktime/"></td>
<td><EMBED SRC="Supplement2.mov" WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=300 AUTOPLAY=true
CONTROLLER=true LOOP=true PLUGINSPAGE=http://www.apple.com/quicktime/"></td>
<td><EMBED SRC="Supplement3.mov" WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=300 AUTOPLAY=true
CONTROLLER=true LOOP=true PLUGINSPAGE=http://www.apple.com/quicktime/"></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Thanks in advance!
--
Mike Levin ml******@comcast.net 22  2661 
__/ [ Michael Levin ] on Saturday 25 February 2006 02:50 \__ I have a very simple page, which shows 3 Quicktime movies in a table. I
think I'm using just standard simple HTML. In Netscape or Safari on a Mac,
they look fine. In Internet Explorer on a PC, the bottom of the movies are
cut off (size issues with the table cells). Could someone look at the html
here
http://server.drmichaellevin.org/worm_supplement.html
and tell me why this is different on different platforms?
If you don't want to go to the URL, the code is this:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title>Untitled Document</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body>
<table width="75%" border="1">
<tr><td>Control</td><td>PCPA</td><td>Reserpine</td></tr>
<tr>
<td><EMBED SRC="Supplement1.mov" WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=300 AUTOPLAY=true
CONTROLLER=true LOOP=true
PLUGINSPAGE=http://www.apple.com/quicktime/"></td>
<td><EMBED SRC="Supplement2.mov" WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=300 AUTOPLAY=true
CONTROLLER=true LOOP=true
PLUGINSPAGE=http://www.apple.com/quicktime/"></td>
<td><EMBED SRC="Supplement3.mov" WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=300 AUTOPLAY=true
CONTROLLER=true LOOP=true
PLUGINSPAGE=http://www.apple.com/quicktime/"></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
Thanks in advance!
If I recall correctly, Internet Explorer does not interpret "height"
correctly. But then again, I am not sure that "height" within a <td> is
legal either. I have been through that frustration testing loop before. Rest
assured that Internet Explorer is on its way out.
"For quite a while now my main browser has been the open source Mozilla
Firefox browser. But in the interests of fairness, when the public IE7
beta came out I quickly downloaded it and started trying to use it as
my primary browser. I was anxious to see if the newly threatened
Microsoft could turn out something better than the fox. And the answer
is... No, at least not yet..." http://blogs.zdnet.com/Burnette/?p=15
Best wishes,
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | Useful fact: close elevator button = Express Mode http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
8:55am up 7 days 21:14, 9 users, load average: 0.27, 0.25, 0.19 http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
In article <C0*********************@comcast.net>, Michael Levin
<ml******@comcast.net> wrote: I have a very simple page, which shows 3 Quicktime movies in a table. I
think I'm using just standard simple HTML.
10 errors in the HTML according to http://validator.w3.org/
On 2/25/06 6:21 AM, in article
25**********************@earthling.net.invalid, "Philo D"
<do***@earthling.net.invalid> wrote: In article <C0*********************@comcast.net>, Michael Levin
<ml******@comcast.net> wrote:
I have a very simple page, which shows 3 Quicktime movies in a table. I
think I'm using just standard simple HTML.
10 errors in the HTML according to
http://validator.w3.org/
Wow - thanks - this looks like a very useful tool. But I'm confused - I must
be doing something very basic wrong because it doesn't seem to like anything
about the very short code, and I got it from a frequently-cited example of
how to include MPG in a web page (not to mention, it works correctly on 3
different browsers on a Mac). Do you have any ideas as to what I'm missing?
All I want is a table that plays 3 movies side-by-side, without having to
click on them (they just go, when the page is uploaded). What's a better way
to do it than
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title>Untitled Document</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body>
<table width="75%" border="1">
<tr><td>Control</td><td>PCPA</td><td>Reserpine</td></tr>
<tr>
<td><EMBED SRC="Supplement1.mov" WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=300 AUTOPLAY=true
CONTROLLER=true LOOP=true PLUGINSPAGE=http://www.apple.com/quicktime/"></td>
<td><EMBED SRC="Supplement2.mov" WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=300 AUTOPLAY=true
CONTROLLER=true LOOP=true PLUGINSPAGE=http://www.apple.com/quicktime/"></td>
<td><EMBED SRC="Supplement3.mov" WIDTH=300 HEIGHT=300 AUTOPLAY=true
CONTROLLER=true LOOP=true PLUGINSPAGE=http://www.apple.com/quicktime/"></td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
--
Mike Levin ml******@comcast.net
Michael Levin <ml******@comcast.net> wrote: On 2/25/06 6:21 AM, in article
25**********************@earthling.net.invalid, "Philo D"
<do***@earthling.net.invalid> wrote:
In article <C0253034.1BF91%ml******@comcast.net>, Michael Levin
<ml******@comcast.net> wrote:
I have a very simple page, which shows 3 Quicktime movies in a table. I
think I'm using just standard simple HTML.
10 errors in the HTML according to
http://validator.w3.org/
Wow - thanks - this looks like a very useful tool. But I'm confused - I must
be doing something very basic wrong because it doesn't seem to like anything
about the very short code, and I got it from a frequently-cited example of
how to include MPG in a web page (not to mention, it works correctly on 3
different browsers on a Mac). Do you have any ideas as to what I'm missing?
Apparently, EMBED is not allowed in a table element.
I'm not sure if it is allowed at all.
--
I recommend Macs to my friends, and Windows machines
to those whom I don't mind billing by the hour
Michael Levin <ml******@comcast.net> wrote: All I want is a table that plays 3 movies side-by-side, without having to
click on them
Why?
--
Spartanicus
In article <C0*********************@comcast.net>, Michael Levin
<ml******@comcast.net> wrote: On 2/25/06 6:21 AM, in article
25**********************@earthling.net.invalid, "Philo D"
<do***@earthling.net.invalid> wrote:
In article <C0253034.1BF91%ml******@comcast.net>, Michael Levin
<ml******@comcast.net> wrote:
I have a very simple page, which shows 3 Quicktime movies in a table. I
think I'm using just standard simple HTML.
10 errors in the HTML according to
http://validator.w3.org/
Wow - thanks - this looks like a very useful tool. But I'm confused
[...] Do you have any ideas as to what I'm missing?
First, decide which version of HTML you intend to write.
Put that in your header.
Then feed your page to validator.w3.org
Now, correct the first error it reports.
Then feed it to validator.w3.org again.
Eventually you should converge to a page with valid HTML.
On 2/26/06 8:31 AM, in article ec********************************@n...utvinternet.ie,
"Spartanicus" <in*****@invalid.invalid> wrote: Michael Levin <ml******@comcast.net> wrote:
All I want is a table that plays 3 movies side-by-side, without having to
click on them
Why?
this will be part of some data that I need to show reviewers of a biology
paper of ours. Each movie has a moving worm in it and I want people to
compare their behavior side-by-side as the movies play together.
--
Mike Levin ml******@comcast.net
On 2/26/06 8:33 AM, in article op.s5k1aknzl8uz2z@zoete_b, "Barbara de Zoete"
<tr******@pretletters.net> wrote: On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:31:42 +0100, Spartanicus <in*****@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
Michael Levin <ml******@comcast.net> wrote:
All I want is a table that plays 3 movies side-by-side, without having
to
click on them
Why?
Because he can? Oh, wait. He can't.
So, why? Good question.
I think I'm missing something. Is this really such a weird thing to want
to do (html-wise) or are people just curious as to what I intend to use this
for?
--
Mike Levin ml******@comcast.net
On 2/26/06 12:19 PM, in article
26**********************@earthling.net.invalid, "Philo D"
<do***@earthling.net.invalid> wrote: In article <C0*********************@comcast.net>, Michael Levin
<ml******@comcast.net> wrote:
On 2/25/06 6:21 AM, in article
250220060621407007%do***@earthling.net.invalid, "Philo D"
<do***@earthling.net.invalid> wrote:
In article <C0253034.1BF91%ml******@comcast.net>, Michael Levin
<ml******@comcast.net> wrote:
I have a very simple page, which shows 3 Quicktime movies in a table. I
think I'm using just standard simple HTML.
10 errors in the HTML according to
http://validator.w3.org/
Wow - thanks - this looks like a very useful tool. But I'm confused
[...] Do you have any ideas as to what I'm missing?
First, decide which version of HTML you intend to write.
Put that in your header.
Then feed your page to validator.w3.org
Now, correct the first error it reports.
Then feed it to validator.w3.org again.
Eventually you should converge to a page with valid HTML.
I understand the process of debugging but since this validator hated so
many things about my short code, I wonder whether rather trying to fix what
I have piece-meal, it might be better to start from scratch and use the
correct elements. I don't want to debug piece by piece if my whole approach
here is misguided and I need to use a different approach for this. How would
people go about displaying 3 quicktime MPG movies to run side-by-side?
--
Mike Levin ml******@comcast.net
Michael Levin <ml******@comcast.net> writes: Michael Levin <ml******@comcast.net> wrote: All I want is a table that plays 3 movies side-by-side, without having to
click on them
this will be part of some data that I need to show reviewers of a biology
paper of ours. Each movie has a moving worm in it and I want people to
compare their behavior side-by-side as the movies play together.
A problem here is that the videos will load - and therefore may
start playing - at different times. If you have sufficiently capable
video-editing software available, then it might be best to combine the
videos into a single video file that showed the three individual
videos side by side in split-screen.
This reduces it to a much easier problem which can be solved by
embedding or linking to the video file as appropriate (linking will be
easier).
--
Chris
Michael Levin <ml******@comcast.net> wrote: I understand the process of debugging but since this validator hated so
many things about my short code,
It's not that bad I think. As I said the primary error was the <EMBED>
tag in the table cells. Most other errors followed from that.
--
I recommend Macs to my friends, and Windows machines
to those whom I don't mind billing by the hour
On 2/26/06 4:58 PM, in article
1hbe2dt.ohgbf51rc59hcN%andekl_no@saaf_spam.se, "Anders Eklöf"
<andekl_no@saaf_spam.se> wrote: Michael Levin <ml******@comcast.net> wrote:
I understand the process of debugging but since this validator hated so
many things about my short code,
It's not that bad I think. As I said the primary error was the <EMBED>
tag in the table cells. Most other errors followed from that.
ok; can you suggest an alternative that would be valid (or more
importantly, would display correctly in Internet Explorer on a PC)?
--
Mike Levin ml******@comcast.net
Michael Levin <ml******@comcast.net> wrote: I understand the process of debugging but since this validator hated so
many things about my short code,
It's not that bad I think. As I said the primary error was the <EMBED>
tag in the table cells. Most other errors followed from that.
ok; can you suggest an alternative that would be valid (or more
importantly, would display correctly in Internet Explorer on a PC)?
You've been given good advice for your situation, edit the three videos
into one, then link to the video.
--
Spartanicus
On 2/26/06 3:42 PM, in article 87************@dinopsis.dur.ac.uk, "Chris
Morris" <c.********@durham.ac.uk> wrote: A problem here is that the videos will load - and therefore may
start playing - at different times. If you have sufficiently capable
video-editing software available, then it might be best to combine the
videos into a single video file that showed the three individual
videos side by side in split-screen.
This reduces it to a much easier problem which can be solved by
embedding or linking to the video file as appropriate (linking will be
easier).
good idea (I hadn't seen this post before now)! Can you suggest any such
software? I've got iMovie and QuickTime Pro, neither of which seem to allow
me to do that. I can get hold of a PC if need be (I do most of my work on a
Mac); is there a good program that allows side-by-side linking?
Mike
--
Mike Levin ml******@comcast.net
On 2/26/06 5:30 PM, in article vn********************************@n...utvinternet.ie,
"Spartanicus" <in*****@invalid.invalid> wrote: You've been given good advice for your situation, edit the three videos
into one, then link to the video.
good idea! I hadn't seen this post before now - I think it hadn't made it to
my news server when I posted my last reply. Anyway, can you suggest any such
software? I've got iMovie and QuickTime Pro, neither of which seem to allow
me to do that. I can get hold of a PC if need be (I do most of my work on a
Mac); is there a good program that allows side-by-side linking?
--
Mike Levin ml******@comcast.net
Michael Levin <ml******@comcast.net> wrote: You've been given good advice for your situation, edit the three videos
into one, then link to the video.
good idea! I hadn't seen this post before now - I think it hadn't made it to
my news server when I posted my last reply. Anyway, can you suggest any such
software? I've got iMovie and QuickTime Pro, neither of which seem to allow
me to do that. I can get hold of a PC if need be (I do most of my work on a
Mac); is there a good program that allows side-by-side linking?
Any decent video editor should do, the best known video editor for the
Mac is probably Adobe Premiere.
Use the video *source* files to create the new video, not compressed
file formats such as QuickTime.
--
Spartanicus
"Michael Levin" <ml******@comcast.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:C0253034.1BF91%ml******@comcast.net... I have a very simple page, which shows 3 Quicktime movies in a table. I
think I'm using just standard simple HTML. In Netscape or Safari on a Mac,
they look fine. In Internet Explorer on a PC, the bottom of the movies are
cut off (size issues with the table cells). Could someone look at the html
here
http://server.drmichaellevin.org/worm_supplement.html
and tell me why this is different on different platforms?
If you don't want to go to the URL, the code is this:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
[snip] Thanks in advance!
--
Mike Levin
ml******@comcast.net
I may be missing something, but your code works beautifully in
IE 6.0 on two PCs here, both with Win2000 SP4 and WinXP Prof
2002 SP2. Nor height problem with MOVs, nothing cut off!
Siggi
Michael Ulrich <sm***********@yahoo.com> wrote: I may be missing something, but your code works beautifully in
IE 6.0 on two PCs here, both with Win2000 SP4 and WinXP Prof
2002 SP2. Nor height problem with MOVs, nothing cut off!
Well, his post was 6 days ago, so there's a strong possibility he's made
changes since then.
--
Mike Rosenberg
<http://www.macconsult.com> Macintosh consulting services for NE Florida
<http://www.cafepress.com/macconsult,macconsult4> Mac-themed T-shirts
<http://bogart-tribute.net> Tribute to Humphrey Bogart
"Mike Rosenberg" <mi**@POSTTOGROUP.invalid> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:1hbm71s.17dn01yp1lhm0N%mi**@POSTTOGROUP.inval id... Well, his post was 6 days ago, so there's a strong possibility he's made
changes since then.
I know I'm a bit slow; just wondered what his problem was.
I have none with his original code.
Siggi
Michael Ulrich <sm***********@yahoo.com> wrote: "Mike Rosenberg" <mi**@POSTTOGROUP.invalid> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:1hbm71s.17dn01yp1lhm0N%mi**@POSTTOGROUP.inval id...
Well, his post was 6 days ago, so there's a strong possibility he's made
changes since then.
I know I'm a bit slow; just wondered what his problem was.
I have none with his original code.
It's still there - he didn't change it.
As I see it, the problem is that EMBED is not approved by W3C, and
thus there is no standard on the implementation of such elements.
So it may look different in different browsers
--
I recommend Macs to my friends, and Windows machines
to those whom I don't mind billing by the hour
In article <C0*********************@comcast.net>,
Michael Levin <ml******@comcast.net> wrote: On 2/26/06 3:42 PM, in article 87************@dinopsis.dur.ac.uk, "Chris
Morris" <c.********@durham.ac.uk> wrote:
A problem here is that the videos will load - and therefore may
start playing - at different times. If you have sufficiently capable
video-editing software available, then it might be best to combine the
videos into a single video file that showed the three individual
videos side by side in split-screen.
good idea (I hadn't seen this post before now)! Can you suggest any such
software? I've got iMovie and QuickTime Pro, neither of which seem to allow
me to do that.
Off-topic, but QuickTime Player Pro allows it like this:
1) Create a still image of the desired movie size.
2) Import it as image sequence.
3) Paste the three movies in (each at the start of the new movie) using
the Add to Movie command (command-option-v) instead of regular paste.
4) In the properties of the video tracks (command-j) adjust the offset
of the second and third track.
5) Turn on High Quality on all video tracks to prevent flicker.
6) Export using a more efficient codec (e.g. Animation in this case).
--
Henri Sivonen hs******@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Mozilla Web Author FAQ: http://mozilla.org/docs/web-developer/faq.html This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Els |
last post by:
Hi,
I would like an opinion on the following:
I have a page which is made up of background-images with transparent
linked images in front of it, which on hover show text in CSS popups.
Due to...
|
by: cmac |
last post by:
Greetings,
I love the HV menu and have been uning it for a long time. I recently
was asked how to make a page for my wife (wedding coming up soon) and
my wife would like to have 2 ways to...
|
by: Rhino |
last post by:
Yesterday, I reworked the index on my site - http://sfl.london.on.ca - so
that they used list markup and I'm quite pleased with them. However, I'm
having a problem with one small aspect of the menu...
|
by: Mason C |
last post by:
I have a small, validated page that uses "bgcolor" in
<body... and several <td... 's
The colors show ok in Opera but not in MSIE or Firefox.
http://frontal-lobe.info/link2pdf.html
I've been...
|
by: Charles Arthur |
last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: nemocccc |
last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
| |
