In article <PP******************@news-server.bigpond.net.au>,
sp***********@gmail.com enlightened us with...
It's not up to the author to worry about, nor fix broken clients, so
that doesn't matter.
If the author doesn't care, then I guess he won't worry, will he?
Most of us DO care if people can't get in touch with us.
Take the other people's advice - use a form and a server-side script or at
least provide them as an alternative along with mailto.
That's probably a good idea, forms can make it easier and can help
prevent spammers finding your e-mail address, since it doesn't need to
be published. However, if he wants to use a mailto:, he can.
No one said he couldn't. Only that there are known problems with it. Hey, if
you all want to piss off everyone who doesn't have a client configured with
their browser, or can't get one configured with it (libs, uni, etc), that's
your prerogative.
I can tell you that there are a lot of people out there who are not good at
using the "internet thingy" and not a one of them will bother to try to open
their web mail in a new window and paste an e-mail addy in there. My parents
are prime examples - they surf plenty, but they have no clue what a mail
client IS, much less anything more complicated.
Not everyone is a computer geek.
If you use only mailto and don't provide a form, then you lose users. Maybe a
few; maybe many. Depends on your client base.
That's certainly up to you to decide if you care about them or not.
I care about ALL my users.
Take care.
--
--
~kaeli~
Is it true that cannibals don't eat clowns because they
taste funny?
http://www.ipwebdesign.net/wildAtHeart http://www.ipwebdesign.net/kaelisSpace