se***********@yahoo.com (Acharya J. Ganesh) wrote in
news:8f*************************@posting.google.co m:
|| Shree Ganesha ||
Dear Friends;
Please check the website chpindia.com and please comment wether it is
done alright this time at least. Last time I got lot of feedback for
ashapurafoods.com saying that the design was not made using strict
dtd. This time I have taken care of using STRICT DTD.
I will comment on the design without looking at the HTM code.
1. There is no good reason to splite your images. It merely increases
download time, and in Mozilla 1.7.2, there is a line in the middle of the
image.
2. Visitors don't want to hear that the page was designed by
seashellwebs.com, and I'm sure the client doesn't either, unless he
agreed to your advertising.
3. Here's a good funny:
"This website is best viewed in all known browsers like IE 5.0+ with
screen resolution 800x600."
I see this right after seeing the standards-compliance buttons, which is
ironic, if you don't know. You are vague about "all known browsers" and
you shouldn't specify a screen resolution. Users aren't going to upgrade
(or downgrade) their monitors to 480000 pixels just for this one Web
page. You also are not going to get them to change their browsers. The
message serves no purpose, and it only insults users who lack Internet
Explorer or prefer to use better browsers. Designing to standards
compliance makes such a statement rather silly, because the idea of
standards compliance is that the page works in all browsers which
understand HTML standards.
4. No visitor wants a stats button, so one shouldn't be there. It
certainly shouldn't be animated.
5. Make the text size larger. Text is useless if it can't be read.
Some people do not have 20/20 vision.